Jump to content

Talk:Palakkad district: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Indian Districts Importance: High, class:start
Line 10: Line 10:
==Taluk map needed==
==Taluk map needed==
Can someone please upload, or atleast provide sources for uploading, taluk map in the style of districts of Tamil Nadu? See [[Sivaganga_District]]. [[User:Anwar saadat|Anwar saadat]] 12:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Can someone please upload, or atleast provide sources for uploading, taluk map in the style of districts of Tamil Nadu? See [[Sivaganga_District]]. [[User:Anwar saadat|Anwar saadat]] 12:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
some more details relating to festivals and temples in palakkad are missing ....


== Dead link ==
== Dead link ==

Revision as of 12:53, 28 February 2012

WikiProject iconIndia: Districts / Kerala Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Indian districts (assessed as High-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala.

Taluk map needed

Can someone please upload, or atleast provide sources for uploading, taluk map in the style of districts of Tamil Nadu? See Sivaganga_District. Anwar saadat 12:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC) some more details relating to festivals and temples in palakkad are missing ....[reply]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!



maru (talk) contribs 04:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Places of Interest

The places of Interest section seems to be out of place. After all, this is not an artle in wikitravel. The aticle looses the nature and spirit that of an encyclopaediac one by this. Anil 00:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]