Jump to content

History of deaf education in the United States: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Early history: some info
improve formatting and remove instances of improper capitalization
Line 3: Line 3:
The '''history of deaf education in the United States''' began in the early 1800s with the creation of the [[American School for the Deaf]] by [[Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet]]. In the late 1800s schools began to use the [[oralism|oral method]] as opposed to the [[manualism|manual method]] previously in place. The oral method was used for many years until sign language instruction gradually began to come back into deaf education.
The '''history of deaf education in the United States''' began in the early 1800s with the creation of the [[American School for the Deaf]] by [[Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet]]. In the late 1800s schools began to use the [[oralism|oral method]] as opposed to the [[manualism|manual method]] previously in place. The oral method was used for many years until sign language instruction gradually began to come back into deaf education.


==Early history==
== Early history ==
Before the 1800s, few, if any, educational opportunities existed for Deaf children in America. Some wealthy families sent their children to Europe's schools, but many non-high class children had no access to education.<ref name=Marschark26>{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |page=26 }}</ref> In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, many wealthy colonists sent their deaf children to Europe to receive schooling.<ref name=crouch25>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=25 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref> The best known deaf educational institution was the Braidwood Academy in [[Edinburgh, Scotland]], established in 1760 by [[Thomas Braidwood]] as the "Academy for the Deaf and Dumb."<ref name=crouch26>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=26 |pages= |at= |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref> The Braidwood Academy was an expensive private [[oralism|oral]] school that was very secretive about its methods, only sharing their methodology with a few select people.<ref name=crouch26 />


Before the 1800s, few, if any, educational opportunities existed for deaf children in America. Some wealthy families sent their children to Europe's schools, but many non-high class children had no access to education.<ref name=Marschark26>
The Bolling family, who lived in Virginia, were the most prominent colonists to send their deaf children to the Braidwood Academy.<ref name=crouch25 /> Thomas Bolling and his wife Elizabeth Gay (who was also his first cousin) had three deaf children, John, Mary, and Thomas Jr., as well as at least two hearing children.<ref name=crouch2526>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |pages=25-26 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref><ref name=crouch29 /> John was the first of the three children to go to the Braidwood Academy in 1771, with Mary and Thomas Jr. arriving later.<ref name=crouch26 /> The three Bolling children arrived back in the United States in 1783; however, they became ill shortly after arriving home, and John died on October 11, 1783.<ref name=crouch27>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=27 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref> Because of this, it cannot be determined how effective the ten years of oral instruction he received were.<ref name=crouch27 /> Mary and Thomas Jr. lived for at least another four decades, and comments about Thomas Jr. noted that he was a "miracle of accomplishments."<ref name=crouch27 />


{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |page=26 }}
The next generation of hearing Bollings had deaf children, and they wanted their children to be educated in the United States.<ref name=crouch29>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=29 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref> William, the last child of Thomas and Elizabeth, married his first cousin Mary, who bore five children, two of whom were deaf.<ref name=crouch29 /> The couple's first deaf child, William Albert, drove his father's desire to create a school for the deaf in America.<ref name=crouch29 /> William Bolling met John Braidwood, a descendant of Thomas Braidwood, after he arrived in America in 1812.<ref name=crouch29 /><ref name=crouch3031>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |pages=30-31 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref> Bolling invited Braidwood to stay in his home as Braidwood sorted out a more permanent living arrangement.<ref name=crouch3031 /> Braidwood discussed with Bolling his desire to open a school similar to the Braidwood Academy in America.<ref name=crouch3031 /> After many setbacks, the Cobbs School was established in 1815.<ref name=crouch3336>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |pages=33-36 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref><ref name=crouch37>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=37 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref> It closed about a year and a half later, in the fall of 1816, when Braidwood's personal problems caused him to leave the school and Bolling could no longer financially maintain it.<ref name=crouch37 />


</ref> In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, many wealthy colonists sent their deaf children to Europe to receive schooling.<ref name=crouch25>
In 1812 in New England, [[Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet]] met a little girl named [[Alice Cogswell]], who inspired him to create a school for the deaf in the United States. In 1815, he traveled to Europe to gain insight on their methods of teaching deaf students.<ref name=crouch39>{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=39 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}</ref> He attempted to learn from the Braidwood system, but the administrators wanted him to sign a contract, remain at the school for several years to be trained in oralism, and agree to keep the teaching methods of the school a secret; Gallaudet refused this.<ref name=crouch39 /> He attended a lecture in France by [[Abbé Sicard]] showcasing two successful pupils of Paris' [[Institut National de Jeunes Sourds de Paris|National Institution for Deaf-Mutes]], [[Jean Massieu]] and [[Laurent Clerc]]. Gallaudet spent several months at the school, and he convinced Clerc, a thirty-year-old assistant teacher, to return with him to Hartford, Connecticut.<ref name=Marschark2728>{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |pages=27–28 }}</ref> Back in America, they established the Connecticut Asylum for the Deaf and Dumb, which was later named the American School for the Deaf, in 1817. Gallaudet was the director, and Clerc was the first Deaf teacher in America. Alice Cogswell was one of the first seven students.<ref name=Marschark2728 />


{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=25 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}
For most of the remainder of the century, education of deaf children using sign language, a practice known as [[manualism]], continued to grow. Approximately forty percent of all teachers were Deaf.<ref name=DeafTimeLine>{{cite web |url=http://www.aslinfo.com/trivia.cfm |title=Deaf Time-Line |author= |year=2011 |work=ASLinfo.com |publisher= |accessdate=23 January 2011}}</ref> More than thirty schools for the deaf were opened, the majority of which were manual. [[William Willard]] was the first Deaf superintendent in America and founded [[Indiana School for the Deaf]] in 1843.<ref name=DeafTimeLine /><ref name=ISDHistory>{{cite web |url=http://deafhoosiers.com/AboutISD/SchoolHistory.asp |title=School History |author= |date= |work=DeafHoosiers |publisher=Indiana School for the Deaf |accessdate=23 January 2011}}</ref> Gallaudet College (now [[Gallaudet University]]) was founded in Washington, D.C in 1864 with Thomas Gallaudet's son, [[Edward Miner Gallaudet]], as the school's superintendent.<ref name=GallyFastFacts>{{cite web |url=http://www.gallaudet.edu/Gallaudet_University/About_Gallaudet/Fast_Facts.html |title=Fast Facts |author= |year=2012 |work= |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref><ref name=GallyHistory>{{cite web |url=http://www.gallaudet.edu/Gallaudet_University/About_Gallaudet/History.html |title=History of Gallaudet University |author= |year=2012 |work= |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref> Edward Miner Gallaudet strongly believed in the use of sign language and had a number of arguments with [[Alexander Graham Bell]], an [[oralist]].<ref name=Winefield>Winefield, Richard. Never the Twain Shall Meet. Washington, D.C: [[Gallaudet University]] Press, 1987. 4.</ref>

</ref> The best known deaf educational institution was the Braidwood Academy in [[Edinburgh, Scotland]], established in 1760 by [[Thomas Braidwood]] as the "Academy for the Deaf and Dumb."<ref name=crouch26>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=26 |pages= |at= |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref> The Braidwood Academy was an expensive private [[oralism|oral]] school that was very secretive about its methods, only sharing their methodology with a few select people.<ref name=crouch26 />

The Bolling family, who lived in Virginia, were the most prominent colonists to send their deaf children to the Braidwood Academy.<ref name=crouch25 /> Thomas Bolling and his wife Elizabeth Gay (who was also his first cousin) had three deaf children, John, Mary, and Thomas Jr., as well as at least two hearing children.<ref name=crouch2526>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |pages=25-26 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref><ref name=crouch29 /> John was the first of the three children to go to the Braidwood Academy in 1771, with Mary and Thomas Jr. arriving later.<ref name=crouch26 /> The three Bolling children arrived back in the United States in 1783; however, they became ill shortly after arriving home, and John died on October 11, 1783.<ref name=crouch27>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=27 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref> Because of this, it cannot be determined how effective the ten years of oral instruction he received were.<ref name=crouch27 /> Mary and Thomas Jr. lived for at least another four decades, and comments about Thomas Jr. noted that he was a "miracle of accomplishments."<ref name=crouch27 />

The next generation of hearing Bollings had deaf children, and they wanted their children to be educated in the United States.<ref name=crouch29>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=29 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref> William, the last child of Thomas and Elizabeth, married his first cousin Mary, who bore five children, two of whom were deaf.<ref name=crouch29 /> The couple's first deaf child, William Albert, drove his father's desire to create a school for the deaf in America.<ref name=crouch29 /> William Bolling met John Braidwood, a descendant of Thomas Braidwood, after he arrived in America in 1812.<ref name=crouch29 /><ref name=crouch3031>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |pages=30-31 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref> Bolling invited Braidwood to stay in his home as Braidwood sorted out a more permanent living arrangement.<ref name=crouch3031 /> Braidwood discussed with Bolling his desire to open a school similar to the Braidwood Academy in America.<ref name=crouch3031 /> After many setbacks, the Cobbs School was established in 1815.<ref name=crouch3336>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |pages=33-36 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref><ref name=crouch37>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=37 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref> It closed about a year and a half later, in the fall of 1816, when Braidwood's personal problems caused him to leave the school and Bolling could no longer financially maintain it.<ref name=crouch37 />

In 1812 in New England, [[Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet]] met a little girl named [[Alice Cogswell]], who inspired him to create a school for the deaf in the United States. In 1815, he traveled to Europe to gain insight on their methods of teaching deaf students.<ref name=crouch39>

{{cite book |last1=Crouch |first1=Barry A. |authorlink1= |last2=Greenwald |first2=Brian H. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |editor1-first=John Vickrey |editor1-last=Van Cleve |editor1-link= |others= |title=The Deaf History Reader |type=Anthology |year=2007 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn=978-1-56368-359-6 |page=39 |chapter=Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States |quote=}}

</ref> He attempted to learn from the Braidwood system, but the administrators wanted him to sign a contract, remain at the school for several years to be trained in oralism, and agree to keep the teaching methods of the school a secret; Gallaudet refused this.<ref name=crouch39 /> He attended a lecture in France by [[Abbé Sicard]] showcasing two successful pupils of Paris' [[Institut National de Jeunes Sourds de Paris|National Institution for Deaf-Mutes]], [[Jean Massieu]] and [[Laurent Clerc]]. Gallaudet spent several months at the school, and he convinced Clerc, a thirty-year-old assistant teacher, to return with him to Hartford, Connecticut.<ref name=Marschark2728>

{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |pages=27–28 }}

</ref> Back in America, they established the Connecticut Asylum for the Deaf and Dumb, which was later named the American School for the Deaf, in 1817. Gallaudet was the director, and Clerc was the first deaf teacher in America. Alice Cogswell was one of the first seven students.<ref name=Marschark2728 />

For most of the remainder of the century, education of deaf children using sign language, a practice known as [[manualism]], continued to grow. Approximately forty percent of all teachers were deaf.<ref name=DeafTimeLine>

{{cite web |url=http://www.aslinfo.com/trivia.cfm |title=Deaf Time-Line |author= |year=2011 |work=ASLinfo.com |publisher= |accessdate=23 January 2011}}

</ref> More than thirty schools for the deaf were opened, the majority of which were manual. [[William Willard]] was the first deaf superintendent in America and founded [[Indiana School for the Deaf]] in 1843.<ref name=DeafTimeLine /><ref name=ISDHistory>

{{cite web |url=http://deafhoosiers.com/AboutISD/SchoolHistory.asp |title=School History |author= |date= |work=DeafHoosiers |publisher=Indiana School for the Deaf |accessdate=23 January 2011}}

</ref> Gallaudet College (now [[Gallaudet University]]) was founded in Washington, D.C in 1864 with Thomas Gallaudet's son, [[Edward Miner Gallaudet]], as the school's superintendent.<ref name=GallyFastFacts>

{{cite web |url=http://www.gallaudet.edu/Gallaudet_University/About_Gallaudet/Fast_Facts.html |title=Fast Facts |author= |year=2012 |work= |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref><ref name=GallyHistory>{{cite web |url=http://www.gallaudet.edu/Gallaudet_University/About_Gallaudet/History.html |title=History of Gallaudet University |author= |year=2012 |work= |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=8 January 2012}}

</ref> Edward Miner Gallaudet strongly believed in the use of sign language and had a number of arguments with [[Alexander Graham Bell]], an [[oralist]].<ref name=Winefield>Winefield, Richard. Never the Twain Shall Meet. Washington, D.C: [[Gallaudet University]] Press, 1987. 4.</ref>


Before the 1860s and before the [[American Civil War]], [[Sign language|manual language]] was very popular among the deaf community and also supported by the hearing community.<ref name=Baynton>Baynton, Douglas. Forbidden Signs. Chicago: [[University of Chicago|The University of Chicago]] Press, 1996. 15.</ref> The hearing community viewed deafness as “[isolating] the individual from the Christian community”.<ref name=Baynton/> At the time, [[Demographics of the United States|the people of the United States]] were fairly religious (notably Christian), and the hearing-advantaged believed that sign language opened deaf individuals' minds and souls to God.<ref name=Baynton/> Through this, the hearing community believed that manualism brought deaf people closer to God and opened deaf people to the [[gospel]], which brought manualism general acceptance.
Before the 1860s and before the [[American Civil War]], [[Sign language|manual language]] was very popular among the deaf community and also supported by the hearing community.<ref name=Baynton>Baynton, Douglas. Forbidden Signs. Chicago: [[University of Chicago|The University of Chicago]] Press, 1996. 15.</ref> The hearing community viewed deafness as “[isolating] the individual from the Christian community”.<ref name=Baynton/> At the time, [[Demographics of the United States|the people of the United States]] were fairly religious (notably Christian), and the hearing-advantaged believed that sign language opened deaf individuals' minds and souls to God.<ref name=Baynton/> Through this, the hearing community believed that manualism brought deaf people closer to God and opened deaf people to the [[gospel]], which brought manualism general acceptance.
Line 18: Line 75:
Prior to the 1860s, the American hearing community viewed manualism, sign language, as an art, and naturally beautiful.<ref name=Baynton/> They also thought of deaf people who signed as being like the Romans because of the pantomimes that are a part of the language.<ref name=Baynton/>
Prior to the 1860s, the American hearing community viewed manualism, sign language, as an art, and naturally beautiful.<ref name=Baynton/> They also thought of deaf people who signed as being like the Romans because of the pantomimes that are a part of the language.<ref name=Baynton/>


==Change from predominantly manual education to oral education==
== Change from predominantly manual education to oral education ==

By the end of the [[American Civil War]] in the late 1860s, the argument for “Survival of the Fittest” was applied to the issue of education for the deaf as a result of a [[Darwinism|Darwinist]] perspective of Evolution.<ref name=Baynton/> This movement brought manualists arguing their view that signs were closer to nature because the first thing babies learn to do is [[gesture]], which is akin to sign language.<ref name=Baynton/> To the deaf community, manualism was at the time considered a gift from God.<ref name=Baynton/> During this particular time in the United States, oralism was coming about which gave some a negative view of manualism because, it was argued, it was not a natural language.<ref name=Baynton/>
By the end of the [[American Civil War]] in the late 1860s, the argument for “Survival of the Fittest” was applied to the issue of education for the deaf as a result of a [[Darwinism|Darwinist]] perspective of Evolution.<ref name=Baynton/> This movement brought manualists arguing their view that signs were closer to nature because the first thing babies learn to do is [[gesture]], which is akin to sign language.<ref name=Baynton/> To the deaf community, manualism was at the time considered a gift from God.<ref name=Baynton/> During this particular time in the United States, oralism was coming about which gave some a negative view of manualism because, it was argued, it was not a natural language.<ref name=Baynton/>


Line 25: Line 83:
At that time the teaching of manual language was restricted because the American Hearing Society saw deaf people who used it as different, as foreigners, or as a group with a separate language that was a threat to the hearing society.<ref name=Baynton/> Members of the hearing community who were in favor of oralism took offense to deaf people having their own group identity and refusing to integrate within the greater community.<ref name=Winefield/>
At that time the teaching of manual language was restricted because the American Hearing Society saw deaf people who used it as different, as foreigners, or as a group with a separate language that was a threat to the hearing society.<ref name=Baynton/> Members of the hearing community who were in favor of oralism took offense to deaf people having their own group identity and refusing to integrate within the greater community.<ref name=Winefield/>


Oralists believed that the manual language made deaf people different, which in turn led them to believe that deaf people were abnormal. Oralists believed that the teaching of oralism allowed deaf children to be more normal.<ref name=Winefield/> Oralists strongly believed that deaf children should put as much effort as possible into learning how to live in spite of their disabilities, thus promoting the teaching of [[lip reading]], mouth movements, and use of [[Hearing aid|hearing technology]].<ref name=Winefield/> Oralists also argued that if deaf people continued the use of manual language as their form of communication, they would never integrate within the rest of society.<ref name=Winefield/>
Oralists believed that the manual language made deaf people different, which in turn led them to believe that deaf people were abnormal. Oralists believed that the teaching of oralism allowed deaf children to be more normal.<ref name=Winefield /> Oralists strongly believed that deaf children should put as much effort as possible into learning how to live in spite of their disabilities, thus promoting the teaching of [[lip reading]], mouth movements, and use of [[Hearing aid|hearing technology]].<ref name=Winefield /> Oralists also argued that if deaf people continued the use of manual language as their form of communication, they would never integrate within the rest of society.<ref name=Winefield />


A [[model figure]] for oralism and against the usage of sign language was [[Alexander Graham Bell]], who created the [[Volta Laboratory and Bureau|Volta Bureau]] in Washington, D.C. to pursue the studies of deafness. Two other Americans who encouraged the founding of oralist schools in the United States were Horance Mann and [[Samuel Gridley Howe]], who travelled to Germany to see their oral schools and who wished to model them.<ref name=Winefield/>
A [[model figure]] for oralism and against the usage of sign language was [[Alexander Graham Bell]], who created the [[Volta Laboratory and Bureau|Volta Bureau]] in Washington, D.C. to pursue the studies of deafness. Two other Americans who encouraged the founding of oralist schools in the United States were Horance Mann and [[Samuel Gridley Howe]], who travelled to Germany to see their oral schools and who wished to model them.<ref name=Winefield />


In 1880, an event called the [[Second International Congress on Education of the Deaf]] (which, despite the name, was actually the first) took place. The Second International Congress was an international meeting of deaf educators from at least seven countries. There were five delegates from America and around 164 delegates total in attendance. The Congress was planned and organized by a committee created by the Pereire Society, a group that was against sign language. More than half of the people invited were known oralists; therefore, the Congress was biased and most, if not all, of the resolutions that were voted on by the delegates gave results in favor of the oral method. Many of the resolutions were worded in ways that supported the oral method, such as "Considering the incontestable superiority of speech over signs in restoring the deaf-mute to society, and in giving him a more perfect knowledge of language,/Declares –/That the Oral method ought to be preferred that of signs for the education and instruction of the deaf and dumb".<ref name=Milan1880>{{cite web |url=http://milan1880.com/milan1880congress/eightresolutions.html |title=Eight Resolutions |last=Sturley |first=Nick |year=2010 |work=Milan 1880 |publisher= |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref>
In 1880, an event called the [[Second International Congress on Education of the Deaf]] (which, despite the name, was actually the first) took place. The Second International Congress was an international meeting of deaf educators from at least seven countries. There were five delegates from America and around 164 delegates total in attendance. The Congress was planned and organized by a committee created by the Pereire Society, a group that was against sign language. More than half of the people invited were known oralists; therefore, the Congress was biased and most, if not all, of the resolutions that were voted on by the delegates gave results in favor of the oral method. Many of the resolutions were worded in ways that supported the oral method, such as "Considering the incontestable superiority of speech over signs in restoring the deaf-mute to society, and in giving him a more perfect knowledge of language,/Declares –/That the Oral method ought to be preferred that of signs for the education and instruction of the deaf and dumb".<ref name=Milan1880>


{{cite web |url=http://milan1880.com/milan1880congress/eightresolutions.html |title=Eight Resolutions |last=Sturley |first=Nick |year=2010 |work=Milan 1880 |publisher= |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref>
==Early 20th century==
After the Congress, deaf education in America changed. Manualists, those who advocated for sign language usage, were effectively "kicked out" and replaced with teachers who used the pure oral method. Deaf teachers were removed from the profession and replaced with hearing ones. Most schools switched to the oral method or were created as oral schools in the first place, and few manual schools remained in existence. The work of deaf educators in the oralist schools, who were mostly women, was to prepare the deaf children for life in the hearing world, which required them to [[English language|learn English]], speech, and lipreading.<ref name=Winefield/> All students that were sent to the oral schools were forced to use the oral method, and oralist schools restricted the deaf students' use of [[American Sign Language]] (ASL) in class and in public. Students in pure oral programs were not allowed to sign in class and were also forbidden to sign in dormitories. Students caught signing were punished, but students continued to learn sign from each other anyway.<ref name=Eyes>Through Deaf Eyes. Diane Garey, Lawrence R. Hott. DVD, Pbs (Direct), 2007.</ref><ref name=OpposingApproaches /> One type of punishment used on deaf students was to force them to wear white gloves that were tied together to prevent them from using signs.<ref name=Eyes/> Those who were not successful under the oral method after several years were transferred to manual classes and considered "oral failures" who would never know anything or be able to make it in the world.<ref name=OpposingApproaches /> Some consider this the "Dark Age of Oralism".<ref name=OpposingApproaches>{{cite web |url=http://cochlearwar.com/history/opposing_approaches.html |title=Opposing Appoaches |last= |first= |year=2010 |work=Cochlear War |publisher=MSM Productions |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref>


==Late 20th century==
== Early 20th century ==
The almost exclusive use of the pure oral method in deaf education continued well into the twentieth century. Then, during the late 1960s, Roy Kay Holcomb coined the term "[[Total Communication]]".<ref name=OpposingApproaches /><ref name=HawkinsANDBrawner>{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414677 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Total Communication. ERIC Digest #559 |last1=Hawkins |first1=Larry|last2=Brawner |first2=Judy |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=24 January 2011}}</ref> This term described an educational method he popularized where the child could use the communication approach that worked best for them in whatever particular situation they were in. If a child learned better with American Sign Language or an English sign system, they were taught using that method. If a different method worked better with another child, they received their instruction that way.<ref name=OpposingApproaches /><ref name=HawkinsANDBrawner/> Some schools using the oral method changed to Total Communication; others just added sign into their existing program or simply allowed children to sign amongst themselves without punishment. Often, the "sign languages" used in oral programs were constructed [[Manually Coded English]] (MCE) systems such as [[Manually Coded English#Seeing Essential English (SEE1)|Seeing Essential English]] or [[Signing Exact English]] or were ASL signs in English word order. The programs used these systems in order to use them with speech in a practice known as Sign Supported Speech or [[Simultaneous Communication]].


After the Congress, deaf education in America changed. Manualists, those who advocated for sign language usage, were effectively "kicked out" and replaced with teachers who used the pure oral method. Deaf teachers were removed from the profession and replaced with hearing ones. Most schools switched to the oral method or were created as oral schools in the first place, and few manual schools remained in existence. The work of deaf educators in the oralist schools, who were mostly women, was to prepare the deaf children for life in the hearing world, which required them to [[English language|learn English]], speech, and lipreading.<ref name=Winefield/> All students that were sent to the oral schools were forced to use the oral method, and oralist schools restricted the deaf students' use of [[American Sign Language]] (ASL) in class and in public. Students in pure oral programs were not allowed to sign in class and were also forbidden to sign in dormitories. Students caught signing were punished, but students continued to learn sign from each other anyway.<ref name=Eyes>
===Deaf President Now===

Through Deaf Eyes. Diane Garey, Lawrence R. Hott. DVD, Pbs (Direct), 2007.

</ref><ref name=OpposingApproaches /> One type of punishment used on deaf students was to force them to wear white gloves that were tied together to prevent them from using signs.<ref name=Eyes/> Those who were not successful under the oral method after several years were transferred to manual classes and considered "oral failures" who would never know anything or be able to make it in the world.<ref name=OpposingApproaches /> Some consider this the "Dark Age of Oralism".<ref name=OpposingApproaches>

{{cite web |url=http://cochlearwar.com/history/opposing_approaches.html |title=Opposing Appoaches |last= |first= |year=2010 |work=Cochlear War |publisher=MSM Productions |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref>

== Late 20th century ==

The almost exclusive use of the pure oral method in deaf education continued well into the twentieth century. Then, during the late 1960s, Roy Kay Holcomb coined the term "[[Total Communication]]".<ref name=OpposingApproaches /><ref name=HawkinsANDBrawner>

{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414677 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Total Communication. ERIC Digest #559 |last1=Hawkins |first1=Larry|last2=Brawner |first2=Judy |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=24 January 2011}}

</ref> This term described an educational method he popularized where the child could use the communication approach that worked best for them in whatever particular situation they were in. If a child learned better with American Sign Language or an English sign system, they were taught using that method. If a different method worked better with another child, they received their instruction that way.<ref name=OpposingApproaches /><ref name=HawkinsANDBrawner/> Some schools using the oral method changed to Total Communication; others just added sign into their existing program or simply allowed children to sign amongst themselves without punishment. Often, the "sign languages" used in oral programs were constructed [[Manually Coded English]] (MCE) systems such as [[Manually Coded English#Seeing Essential English (SEE1)|Seeing Essential English]] or [[Signing Exact English]] or were ASL signs in English word order. The programs used these systems in order to use them with speech in a practice known as Sign Supported Speech or [[Simultaneous Communication]].

=== Deaf President Now ===
{{main|Deaf President Now}}
{{main|Deaf President Now}}


In 1988, Gallaudet University students decided that they would take matters of their education into their own hands. The sixth president of Gallaudet had announced in late 1987 that he would be resigning his position as president.<ref name=Barnartt1>
In 1988, Gallaudet University students decided that they would take matters of their education into their own hands. The sixth president of Gallaudet had announced in late 1987 that he would be resigning his position as president.<ref name=Barnartt1>{{cite book |title=Deaf President Now! |last1=Chistiansen |first1=John B. |authorlink1= |last2=Barnartt |first2=Sharon N. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |year=1995 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn= |page=1 |pages= }}</ref> By early 1988, the committee that selected the candidates had narrowed it down to three finalists, two of which, Dr. [[Harvey Corson]] and Dr. [[I. King Jordan]], were Deaf, and one of which, Dr. [[Elisabeth Zinser]], was hearing.<ref name=DPNhistory>{{cite web |url=http://president.gallaudet.edu/About_Gallaudet/History_of_the_University/DPN_Home/Issues/History_behind_DPN.html |title=The History Behind DPN: What Happened... |year=2011 |work=Deaf President Now Protest |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref> On March 6, it was announced hastily through press release (even though the selection committee was supposed to come on campus) that Zinser, the only hearing candidate, had become the seventh president of the university.<ref name=WeekOfDPN>{{cite web |url=http://president.gallaudet.edu/About_Gallaudet/History_of_the_University/DPN_Home/Issues/Week_of_DPN.html |title=The Week of DPN |year=2011 |work=Deaf President Now Protest |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref> There had been rallies beforehand for a Deaf president (most notably on March 1), but on the 6th, the rallying changed into protest. Students and faculty went on marches, made signs, and gave demonstrations.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> The students locked the gates to the university and refused let the school open until Zinser resigned.<ref name=Barnartt68>{{cite book |title=Deaf President Now! |last1=Chistiansen |first1=John B. |authorlink1= |last2=Barnartt |first2=Sharon N. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |year=1995 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn= |page= |pages=68–69 }}</ref> Under intense pressure from the students protesting, Zinser resigned on the fifth day of the protest, March 10.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> Many students decided to stay on campus instead of going on Spring Break, which was scheduled to begin on March 11.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> Two days later, on March 13 Jane Spilman resigned and was replaced by Phil Bravin as chair of the Board of Trustees, a taskforce was created to figure out how to achieve a 51% majority of deaf people on the Board of Trustees, and no one received any punishment for being in the protest.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> I. King Jordan was named eighth president—and first Deaf president—of Gallaudet University.


{{cite book |title=Deaf President Now! |last1=Chistiansen |first1=John B. |authorlink1= |last2=Barnartt |first2=Sharon N. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |year=1995 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn= |page=1 |pages= }}
Deaf President Now changed Deaf education. Before the protest, a select few deaf people held doctorates; however, since the protest, the number of deaf people pursuing and earning advanced degrees has steadily increased.<ref name=Impact>{{cite web |url=http://www.gallaudet.edu/About_Gallaudet/History_of_the_University/DPN_Home/Impact.html |title=The Impact |year=2011 |work=Deaf President Now Protest |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=28 April 2011}}</ref> Also, schools for the deaf across America have had “mini DPNs” where students demanded Deaf superintendents and senior administrators.<ref name=Impact /> In addition, collegiate programs were created in other countries that did not previously have them (such as Japan, Sweden, and South Africa).<ref name=Impact /> Deaf President Now not only affected Deaf education in America, but it also affected Deaf education worldwide.

</ref> By early 1988, the committee that selected the candidates had narrowed it down to three finalists, two of which, Dr. [[Harvey Corson]] and Dr. [[I. King Jordan]], were deaf, and one of which, Dr. [[Elisabeth Zinser]], was hearing.<ref name=DPNhistory>

{{cite web |url=http://president.gallaudet.edu/About_Gallaudet/History_of_the_University/DPN_Home/Issues/History_behind_DPN.html |title=The History Behind DPN: What Happened... |year=2011 |work=Deaf President Now Protest |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=25 January 2011}}

</ref> On March 6, it was announced hastily through press release (even though the selection committee was supposed to come on campus) that Zinser, the only hearing candidate, had become the seventh president of the university.<ref name=WeekOfDPN>

{{cite web |url=http://president.gallaudet.edu/About_Gallaudet/History_of_the_University/DPN_Home/Issues/Week_of_DPN.html |title=The Week of DPN |year=2011 |work=Deaf President Now Protest |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=25 January 2011}}

</ref> There had been rallies beforehand for a deaf president (most notably on March 1), but on the 6th, the rallying changed into protest. Students and faculty went on marches, made signs, and gave demonstrations.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> The students locked the gates to the university and refused let the school open until Zinser resigned.<ref name=Barnartt68>

{{cite book |title=Deaf President Now! |last1=Chistiansen |first1=John B. |authorlink1= |last2=Barnartt |first2=Sharon N. |authorlink2= |coauthors= |year=1995 |publisher=Gallaudet University Press |location=Washington, D.C. |isbn= |page= |pages=68–69 }}

</ref> Under intense pressure from the students protesting, Zinser resigned on the fifth day of the protest, March 10.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> Many students decided to stay on campus instead of going on Spring Break, which was scheduled to begin on March 11.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> Two days later, on March 13 Jane Spilman resigned and was replaced by Phil Bravin as chair of the Board of Trustees, a taskforce was created to figure out how to achieve a 51% majority of deaf people on the Board of Trustees, and no one received any punishment for being in the protest.<ref name=WeekOfDPN /> I. King Jordan was named eighth president—and first deaf president—of Gallaudet University.

Deaf President Now changed deaf education. Before the protest, a select few deaf people held doctorates; however, since the protest, the number of deaf people pursuing and earning advanced degrees has steadily increased.<ref name=Impact>

{{cite web |url=http://www.gallaudet.edu/About_Gallaudet/History_of_the_University/DPN_Home/Impact.html |title=The Impact |year=2011 |work=Deaf President Now Protest |publisher=Gallaudet University |accessdate=28 April 2011}}

</ref> Also, schools for the deaf across America have had “mini DPNs” where students demanded deaf superintendents and senior administrators.<ref name=Impact /> In addition, collegiate programs were created in other countries that did not previously have them (such as Japan, Sweden, and South Africa).<ref name=Impact /> Deaf President Now not only affected deaf education in America, but it also affected deaf education worldwide.

In 1990, [[cochlear implant]]s were approved for children two years of age and up.<ref name=Laughton>

{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414672 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Cochlear Implants. ERIC Digest #E554 |last=Laughton |first=Joan |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=25 January 2011}}


In 1990, [[cochlear implant]]s were approved for children two years of age and up.<ref name=Laughton>{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414672 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Cochlear Implants. ERIC Digest #E554 |last=Laughton |first=Joan |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=25 January 2011}}
</ref> This drastically changed education for deaf children. More children than ever were migrated out of [[bilingual-bicultural education|bilingual-bicultural]] residential schools and into oral schools and mainstream programs with no extra supports. Parents were not encouraged to sign with their children because it was feared that it would slow down their speech, even though research has shown that the opposite is true.{{citation needed|date=February 2012}} This move from residential schools to day schools and mainstreaming has caused many residential programs to downsize.
</ref> This drastically changed education for deaf children. More children than ever were migrated out of [[bilingual-bicultural education|bilingual-bicultural]] residential schools and into oral schools and mainstream programs with no extra supports. Parents were not encouraged to sign with their children because it was feared that it would slow down their speech, even though research has shown that the opposite is true.{{citation needed|date=February 2012}} This move from residential schools to day schools and mainstreaming has caused many residential programs to downsize.


==Today==
== Today ==
{{Expand section|1=<nowiki />
{{Expand section|1=<nowiki />

* Descriptions of oral methods of education
* Descriptions of oral methods of education
* Descriptions of any other methods of education
* Descriptions of any other methods of education
Line 56: Line 152:
Today, there are a few different methods used in the education of deaf children in the United States.
Today, there are a few different methods used in the education of deaf children in the United States.


===Bilingual-bicultural education===
=== Bilingual-bicultural education ===
{{main|Bilingual-bicultural education}}
{{main|Bilingual-bicultural education}}
In this educational method, deafness is not seen as a medical issue; it is instead seen as a cultural issue.<ref name=Baker /> In the bilingual-bicultural program, it is advocated that children who are Deaf be taught ASL as a first language, then be taught written and/or spoken English as a second language.<ref name=Baker>{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414671 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Bilingual-Bicultural Education. ERIC Digest #E553 |last1=Baker |first1=Sharon |last2=Baker |first2=Keith |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children |accessdate=23 January 2011}}</ref><ref name=Marschark145>{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |page=145 }}</ref> Bilingual-bicultural programs emphasize that English and ASL are equal languages, and they work to help children develop age-appropriate levels of fluency in both languages.<ref name=Marschark145 /> The bilingual-bicultural approach holds the belief that Deaf children are visual learners as opposed to auditory learners.<ref name=Baker /> Therefore, classes should be conducted in a complete visual language. Since American Sign Language and spoken English cannot be used simultaneously for fear of harming the accuracy and fluency of both, American Sign Language alone with no spoken language, or voice-off ASL, is usually used. Many bilingual-bicultural schools have dormitories, and Deaf children can either commute there daily or stay in a dormitory as part of the residential program and visit their families on weekends and/or holidays and school vacations.


In this educational method, deafness is not seen as a medical issue; it is instead seen as a cultural issue.<ref name=Baker /> In the bilingual-bicultural program, it is advocated that children who are deaf be taught ASL as a first language, then be taught written and/or spoken English as a second language.<ref name=Baker>
In residential programs, Deaf children are fully immersed in [[Deaf culture]]. At a residential school, nobody is different because they are Deaf. They have "a common heritage,… a common language,… and a set of customs and values".<ref name=Gilliam>{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414676 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Residential Life, ASL, and Deaf Culture. ERIC Digest #558 |last1=Gilliam |first1=Judith |last2=Easterbrooks |first2=Susan |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=23 January 2011}}</ref> People at Deaf schools help pass on "Deaf folklore and folklife (jokes, legends, games, riddles, etc.)" from one generation to the next.<ref name=Gilliam /> Deaf parents of Deaf children often send their children to residential schools so that they may participate in the Deaf community and culture. Hearing parents are often a bit more reluctant because they do not want to be separated from their children.<ref name=Gilliam />


{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414671 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Bilingual-Bicultural Education. ERIC Digest #E553 |last1=Baker |first1=Sharon |last2=Baker |first2=Keith |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children |accessdate=23 January 2011}}
===Auditory-oral and auditory-verbal education===

</ref><ref name=Marschark145>

{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |page=145 }}

</ref> Bilingual-bicultural programs emphasize that English and ASL are equal languages, and they work to help children develop age-appropriate levels of fluency in both languages.<ref name=Marschark145 /> The bilingual-bicultural approach holds the belief that deaf children are visual learners as opposed to auditory learners.<ref name=Baker /> Therefore, classes should be conducted in a complete visual language. Since American Sign Language and spoken English cannot be used simultaneously for fear of harming the accuracy and fluency of both, American Sign Language alone with no spoken language, or voice-off ASL, is usually used. Many bilingual-bicultural schools have dormitories, and deaf children can either commute there daily or stay in a dormitory as part of the residential program and visit their families on weekends and/or holidays and school vacations.

In residential programs, deaf children are fully immersed in [[Deaf culture]]. At a residential school, nobody is different because they are deaf. They have "a common heritage,… a common language,… and a set of customs and values".<ref name=Gilliam>

{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414676 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Residential Life, ASL, and Deaf Culture. ERIC Digest #558 |last1=Gilliam |first1=Judith |last2=Easterbrooks |first2=Susan |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=23 January 2011}}

</ref> People at deaf schools help pass on "Deaf folklore and folklife (jokes, legends, games, riddles, etc.)" from one generation to the next.<ref name=Gilliam /> Deaf parents of deaf children often send their children to residential schools so that they may participate in the deaf community and culture. Hearing parents are often a bit more reluctant because they do not want to be separated from their children.<ref name=Gilliam />

=== Auditory-oral and auditory-verbal education ===
{{main|Auditory-verbal therapy|Oralism}}
{{main|Auditory-verbal therapy|Oralism}}
The auditory-oral and auditory-verbal methods are forms of oral education. These methods are based on the belief that a deaf child can learn to listen and speak and that families do not need to learn sign language or [[cued speech]].<ref name=Stone>{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414669 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Auditory-Oral. ERIC Digest #E551|last1=Stone |first1=Patrick |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=4 February 2012}}</ref><ref name=Goldberg>{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414670 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Auditory-Verbal. ERIC Digest #E552|last1=Goldberg |first1=Donald |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=4 February 2012}}</ref> These methods are presented as communication options, and they rely on a large amount of parental involvement.<ref name=Stone /><ref name=Goldberg /> Children who use this option may be placed in continuum of educational placements including oral schools, such as [[Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech]], self-contained classrooms for deaf students in public schools, or mainstream classrooms with hearing students.<ref name=Stone /><ref name=Goldberg /><ref name=nkis>{{cite video |people= |year= |title= |url=http://www.oraldeafed.org/movies/nkis.html |format=mov |publisher=Oral Deaf Education |accessdate=4 February 2012}}</ref>


The auditory-oral and auditory-verbal methods are forms of oral education. These methods are based on the belief that a deaf child can learn to listen and speak and that families do not need to learn sign language or [[cued speech]].<ref name=Stone>
===Mainstreaming and inclusion===

{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414669 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Auditory-Oral. ERIC Digest #E551|last1=Stone |first1=Patrick |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=4 February 2012}}

</ref><ref name=Goldberg>

{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414670 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Auditory-Verbal. ERIC Digest #E552|last1=Goldberg |first1=Donald |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=4 February 2012}}

</ref> These methods are presented as communication options, and they rely on a large amount of parental involvement.<ref name=Stone /><ref name=Goldberg /> Children who use this option may be placed in continuum of educational placements including oral schools, such as [[Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech]], self-contained classrooms for deaf students in public schools, or mainstream classrooms with hearing students.<ref name=Stone /><ref name=Goldberg /><ref name=nkis>

{{cite video |people= |year= |title= |url=http://www.oraldeafed.org/movies/nkis.html |format=mov |publisher=Oral Deaf Education |accessdate=4 February 2012}}</ref>

=== Mainstreaming and inclusion ===
{{main|Mainstreaming (education)|Inclusion (education)}}
{{main|Mainstreaming (education)|Inclusion (education)}}


This educational method is what occurs when a deaf child attends public school in regular classes for at least part of the school day.<ref name=Marschark143>{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |page=143 }}</ref> Students may receive accommodations such as [[itinerant teacher]]s, [[interpreters]], [[assistive technology]], notetakers, and [[Paraprofessional educator|aides]].<ref name=Innes>{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414675 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Inclusion. ERIC Digest #E557|last1=Nowell |first1=Richard |last2=Innes |first2=Joseph |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=25 January 2011}}</ref><ref name=placement>{{cite web |url=http://www.handsandvoices.org/needs/placement.htm |title=School Placement Considerations for Students Who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing |year=2005 |work= |publisher=Hands and Voices |accessdate=23 January 2011}}</ref> Inclusion can have benefits including daily interaction with hearing students and the opportunity to live at home, but it can also have drawbacks such as isolation and limited availability of support.
This educational method is what occurs when a deaf child attends public school in regular classes for at least part of the school day.<ref name=Marschark143>
{{cite book |title=Educating Deaf Students |last1=Marschark |first1=Marc |authorlink1= |last2=Lang |first2=Harry G |authorlink2= |last3Albertini |first3=John A. |authorlink3= |coauthors= |year=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=New York |isbn= |page=143 }}
</ref> Students may receive accommodations such as [[itinerant teacher]]s, [[interpreters]], [[assistive technology]], notetakers, and [[Paraprofessional educator|aides]].<ref name=Innes>
{{cite web |url=http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED414675 |title=Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Inclusion. ERIC Digest #E557|last1=Nowell |first1=Richard |last2=Innes |first2=Joseph |date=August 1997 |work=Education Resources Information Center |publisher=ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education |accessdate=25 January 2011}}
</ref><ref name=placement>

{{cite web |url=http://www.handsandvoices.org/needs/placement.htm |title=School Placement Considerations for Students Who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing |year=2005 |work= |publisher=Hands and Voices |accessdate=23 January 2011}}

</ref> Inclusion can have benefits including daily interaction with hearing students and the opportunity to live at home, but it can also have drawbacks such as isolation and limited availability of support.


== See also ==
== See also ==

* [[Deaf culture]]
* [[Deaf culture]]
* [[Education of the deaf]]
* [[Education of the deaf]]
Line 81: Line 214:
== References ==
== References ==


{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Education of the deaf}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Education of the deaf}}

Revision as of 04:38, 2 March 2012

The history of deaf education in the United States began in the early 1800s with the creation of the American School for the Deaf by Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet. In the late 1800s schools began to use the oral method as opposed to the manual method previously in place. The oral method was used for many years until sign language instruction gradually began to come back into deaf education.

Early history

Before the 1800s, few, if any, educational opportunities existed for deaf children in America. Some wealthy families sent their children to Europe's schools, but many non-high class children had no access to education.[1] In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, many wealthy colonists sent their deaf children to Europe to receive schooling.[2] The best known deaf educational institution was the Braidwood Academy in Edinburgh, Scotland, established in 1760 by Thomas Braidwood as the "Academy for the Deaf and Dumb."[3] The Braidwood Academy was an expensive private oral school that was very secretive about its methods, only sharing their methodology with a few select people.[3]

The Bolling family, who lived in Virginia, were the most prominent colonists to send their deaf children to the Braidwood Academy.[2] Thomas Bolling and his wife Elizabeth Gay (who was also his first cousin) had three deaf children, John, Mary, and Thomas Jr., as well as at least two hearing children.[4][5] John was the first of the three children to go to the Braidwood Academy in 1771, with Mary and Thomas Jr. arriving later.[3] The three Bolling children arrived back in the United States in 1783; however, they became ill shortly after arriving home, and John died on October 11, 1783.[6] Because of this, it cannot be determined how effective the ten years of oral instruction he received were.[6] Mary and Thomas Jr. lived for at least another four decades, and comments about Thomas Jr. noted that he was a "miracle of accomplishments."[6]

The next generation of hearing Bollings had deaf children, and they wanted their children to be educated in the United States.[5] William, the last child of Thomas and Elizabeth, married his first cousin Mary, who bore five children, two of whom were deaf.[5] The couple's first deaf child, William Albert, drove his father's desire to create a school for the deaf in America.[5] William Bolling met John Braidwood, a descendant of Thomas Braidwood, after he arrived in America in 1812.[5][7] Bolling invited Braidwood to stay in his home as Braidwood sorted out a more permanent living arrangement.[7] Braidwood discussed with Bolling his desire to open a school similar to the Braidwood Academy in America.[7] After many setbacks, the Cobbs School was established in 1815.[8][9] It closed about a year and a half later, in the fall of 1816, when Braidwood's personal problems caused him to leave the school and Bolling could no longer financially maintain it.[9]

In 1812 in New England, Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet met a little girl named Alice Cogswell, who inspired him to create a school for the deaf in the United States. In 1815, he traveled to Europe to gain insight on their methods of teaching deaf students.[10] He attempted to learn from the Braidwood system, but the administrators wanted him to sign a contract, remain at the school for several years to be trained in oralism, and agree to keep the teaching methods of the school a secret; Gallaudet refused this.[10] He attended a lecture in France by Abbé Sicard showcasing two successful pupils of Paris' National Institution for Deaf-Mutes, Jean Massieu and Laurent Clerc. Gallaudet spent several months at the school, and he convinced Clerc, a thirty-year-old assistant teacher, to return with him to Hartford, Connecticut.[11] Back in America, they established the Connecticut Asylum for the Deaf and Dumb, which was later named the American School for the Deaf, in 1817. Gallaudet was the director, and Clerc was the first deaf teacher in America. Alice Cogswell was one of the first seven students.[11]

For most of the remainder of the century, education of deaf children using sign language, a practice known as manualism, continued to grow. Approximately forty percent of all teachers were deaf.[12] More than thirty schools for the deaf were opened, the majority of which were manual. William Willard was the first deaf superintendent in America and founded Indiana School for the Deaf in 1843.[12][13] Gallaudet College (now Gallaudet University) was founded in Washington, D.C in 1864 with Thomas Gallaudet's son, Edward Miner Gallaudet, as the school's superintendent.[14][15] Edward Miner Gallaudet strongly believed in the use of sign language and had a number of arguments with Alexander Graham Bell, an oralist.[16]

Before the 1860s and before the American Civil War, manual language was very popular among the deaf community and also supported by the hearing community.[17] The hearing community viewed deafness as “[isolating] the individual from the Christian community”.[17] At the time, the people of the United States were fairly religious (notably Christian), and the hearing-advantaged believed that sign language opened deaf individuals' minds and souls to God.[17] Through this, the hearing community believed that manualism brought deaf people closer to God and opened deaf people to the gospel, which brought manualism general acceptance.

Prior to the 1860s, the American hearing community viewed manualism, sign language, as an art, and naturally beautiful.[17] They also thought of deaf people who signed as being like the Romans because of the pantomimes that are a part of the language.[17]

Change from predominantly manual education to oral education

By the end of the American Civil War in the late 1860s, the argument for “Survival of the Fittest” was applied to the issue of education for the deaf as a result of a Darwinist perspective of Evolution.[17] This movement brought manualists arguing their view that signs were closer to nature because the first thing babies learn to do is gesture, which is akin to sign language.[17] To the deaf community, manualism was at the time considered a gift from God.[17] During this particular time in the United States, oralism was coming about which gave some a negative view of manualism because, it was argued, it was not a natural language.[17]

Support for oralism gained momentum in the late 1860s and the use of manualism started to decrease. Many in the hearing community were now in favor of the evolutionary perspective, which depicted deaf people who used manual language akin to “lower animals”.[17] Some hearing people viewed speech as what separated humans from animals, which in turn caused manual language to be viewed as unhumanlike.[17] The first schools for oralism opened in the 1860s were called The New York Institution for the Improved Instruction of Deaf Mutes and The Clarke Institution for Deaf-Mutes (now the Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech).

At that time the teaching of manual language was restricted because the American Hearing Society saw deaf people who used it as different, as foreigners, or as a group with a separate language that was a threat to the hearing society.[17] Members of the hearing community who were in favor of oralism took offense to deaf people having their own group identity and refusing to integrate within the greater community.[16]

Oralists believed that the manual language made deaf people different, which in turn led them to believe that deaf people were abnormal. Oralists believed that the teaching of oralism allowed deaf children to be more normal.[16] Oralists strongly believed that deaf children should put as much effort as possible into learning how to live in spite of their disabilities, thus promoting the teaching of lip reading, mouth movements, and use of hearing technology.[16] Oralists also argued that if deaf people continued the use of manual language as their form of communication, they would never integrate within the rest of society.[16]

A model figure for oralism and against the usage of sign language was Alexander Graham Bell, who created the Volta Bureau in Washington, D.C. to pursue the studies of deafness. Two other Americans who encouraged the founding of oralist schools in the United States were Horance Mann and Samuel Gridley Howe, who travelled to Germany to see their oral schools and who wished to model them.[16]

In 1880, an event called the Second International Congress on Education of the Deaf (which, despite the name, was actually the first) took place. The Second International Congress was an international meeting of deaf educators from at least seven countries. There were five delegates from America and around 164 delegates total in attendance. The Congress was planned and organized by a committee created by the Pereire Society, a group that was against sign language. More than half of the people invited were known oralists; therefore, the Congress was biased and most, if not all, of the resolutions that were voted on by the delegates gave results in favor of the oral method. Many of the resolutions were worded in ways that supported the oral method, such as "Considering the incontestable superiority of speech over signs in restoring the deaf-mute to society, and in giving him a more perfect knowledge of language,/Declares –/That the Oral method ought to be preferred that of signs for the education and instruction of the deaf and dumb".[18]

Early 20th century

After the Congress, deaf education in America changed. Manualists, those who advocated for sign language usage, were effectively "kicked out" and replaced with teachers who used the pure oral method. Deaf teachers were removed from the profession and replaced with hearing ones. Most schools switched to the oral method or were created as oral schools in the first place, and few manual schools remained in existence. The work of deaf educators in the oralist schools, who were mostly women, was to prepare the deaf children for life in the hearing world, which required them to learn English, speech, and lipreading.[16] All students that were sent to the oral schools were forced to use the oral method, and oralist schools restricted the deaf students' use of American Sign Language (ASL) in class and in public. Students in pure oral programs were not allowed to sign in class and were also forbidden to sign in dormitories. Students caught signing were punished, but students continued to learn sign from each other anyway.[19][20] One type of punishment used on deaf students was to force them to wear white gloves that were tied together to prevent them from using signs.[19] Those who were not successful under the oral method after several years were transferred to manual classes and considered "oral failures" who would never know anything or be able to make it in the world.[20] Some consider this the "Dark Age of Oralism".[20]

Late 20th century

The almost exclusive use of the pure oral method in deaf education continued well into the twentieth century. Then, during the late 1960s, Roy Kay Holcomb coined the term "Total Communication".[20][21] This term described an educational method he popularized where the child could use the communication approach that worked best for them in whatever particular situation they were in. If a child learned better with American Sign Language or an English sign system, they were taught using that method. If a different method worked better with another child, they received their instruction that way.[20][21] Some schools using the oral method changed to Total Communication; others just added sign into their existing program or simply allowed children to sign amongst themselves without punishment. Often, the "sign languages" used in oral programs were constructed Manually Coded English (MCE) systems such as Seeing Essential English or Signing Exact English or were ASL signs in English word order. The programs used these systems in order to use them with speech in a practice known as Sign Supported Speech or Simultaneous Communication.

Deaf President Now

In 1988, Gallaudet University students decided that they would take matters of their education into their own hands. The sixth president of Gallaudet had announced in late 1987 that he would be resigning his position as president.[22] By early 1988, the committee that selected the candidates had narrowed it down to three finalists, two of which, Dr. Harvey Corson and Dr. I. King Jordan, were deaf, and one of which, Dr. Elisabeth Zinser, was hearing.[23] On March 6, it was announced hastily through press release (even though the selection committee was supposed to come on campus) that Zinser, the only hearing candidate, had become the seventh president of the university.[24] There had been rallies beforehand for a deaf president (most notably on March 1), but on the 6th, the rallying changed into protest. Students and faculty went on marches, made signs, and gave demonstrations.[24] The students locked the gates to the university and refused let the school open until Zinser resigned.[25] Under intense pressure from the students protesting, Zinser resigned on the fifth day of the protest, March 10.[24] Many students decided to stay on campus instead of going on Spring Break, which was scheduled to begin on March 11.[24] Two days later, on March 13 Jane Spilman resigned and was replaced by Phil Bravin as chair of the Board of Trustees, a taskforce was created to figure out how to achieve a 51% majority of deaf people on the Board of Trustees, and no one received any punishment for being in the protest.[24] I. King Jordan was named eighth president—and first deaf president—of Gallaudet University.

Deaf President Now changed deaf education. Before the protest, a select few deaf people held doctorates; however, since the protest, the number of deaf people pursuing and earning advanced degrees has steadily increased.[26] Also, schools for the deaf across America have had “mini DPNs” where students demanded deaf superintendents and senior administrators.[26] In addition, collegiate programs were created in other countries that did not previously have them (such as Japan, Sweden, and South Africa).[26] Deaf President Now not only affected deaf education in America, but it also affected deaf education worldwide.

In 1990, cochlear implants were approved for children two years of age and up.[27] This drastically changed education for deaf children. More children than ever were migrated out of bilingual-bicultural residential schools and into oral schools and mainstream programs with no extra supports. Parents were not encouraged to sign with their children because it was feared that it would slow down their speech, even though research has shown that the opposite is true.[citation needed] This move from residential schools to day schools and mainstreaming has caused many residential programs to downsize.

Today

Today, there are a few different methods used in the education of deaf children in the United States.

Bilingual-bicultural education

In this educational method, deafness is not seen as a medical issue; it is instead seen as a cultural issue.[28] In the bilingual-bicultural program, it is advocated that children who are deaf be taught ASL as a first language, then be taught written and/or spoken English as a second language.[28][29] Bilingual-bicultural programs emphasize that English and ASL are equal languages, and they work to help children develop age-appropriate levels of fluency in both languages.[29] The bilingual-bicultural approach holds the belief that deaf children are visual learners as opposed to auditory learners.[28] Therefore, classes should be conducted in a complete visual language. Since American Sign Language and spoken English cannot be used simultaneously for fear of harming the accuracy and fluency of both, American Sign Language alone with no spoken language, or voice-off ASL, is usually used. Many bilingual-bicultural schools have dormitories, and deaf children can either commute there daily or stay in a dormitory as part of the residential program and visit their families on weekends and/or holidays and school vacations.

In residential programs, deaf children are fully immersed in Deaf culture. At a residential school, nobody is different because they are deaf. They have "a common heritage,… a common language,… and a set of customs and values".[30] People at deaf schools help pass on "Deaf folklore and folklife (jokes, legends, games, riddles, etc.)" from one generation to the next.[30] Deaf parents of deaf children often send their children to residential schools so that they may participate in the deaf community and culture. Hearing parents are often a bit more reluctant because they do not want to be separated from their children.[30]

Auditory-oral and auditory-verbal education

The auditory-oral and auditory-verbal methods are forms of oral education. These methods are based on the belief that a deaf child can learn to listen and speak and that families do not need to learn sign language or cued speech.[31][32] These methods are presented as communication options, and they rely on a large amount of parental involvement.[31][32] Children who use this option may be placed in continuum of educational placements including oral schools, such as Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech, self-contained classrooms for deaf students in public schools, or mainstream classrooms with hearing students.[31][32][33]

Mainstreaming and inclusion

This educational method is what occurs when a deaf child attends public school in regular classes for at least part of the school day.[34] Students may receive accommodations such as itinerant teachers, interpreters, assistive technology, notetakers, and aides.[35][36] Inclusion can have benefits including daily interaction with hearing students and the opportunity to live at home, but it can also have drawbacks such as isolation and limited availability of support.

See also

References

  1. ^ Marschark, Marc; Lang, Harry G (2002). Educating Deaf Students. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 26. {{cite book}}: |first3= missing |last3= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); Text "last3Albertini" ignored (help)
  2. ^ a b Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  3. ^ a b c Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  4. ^ Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. pp. 25–26. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  5. ^ a b c d e Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  6. ^ a b c Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. p. 27. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  7. ^ a b c Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. pp. 30–31. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  8. ^ Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. pp. 33–36. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  9. ^ a b Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. p. 37. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  10. ^ a b Crouch, Barry A.; Greenwald, Brian H. (2007). "Hearing with the Eye: The Rise of Deaf Education in the United States". In Van Cleve, John Vickrey (ed.). The Deaf History Reader (Anthology). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. p. 39. ISBN 978-1-56368-359-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  11. ^ a b Marschark, Marc; Lang, Harry G (2002). Educating Deaf Students. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 27–28. {{cite book}}: |first3= missing |last3= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); Text "last3Albertini" ignored (help)
  12. ^ a b "Deaf Time-Line". ASLinfo.com. 2011. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  13. ^ "School History". DeafHoosiers. Indiana School for the Deaf. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  14. ^ "Fast Facts". Gallaudet University. 2012. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
  15. ^ "History of Gallaudet University". Gallaudet University. 2012. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g Winefield, Richard. Never the Twain Shall Meet. Washington, D.C: Gallaudet University Press, 1987. 4.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Baynton, Douglas. Forbidden Signs. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996. 15.
  18. ^ Sturley, Nick (2010). "Eight Resolutions". Milan 1880. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
  19. ^ a b Through Deaf Eyes. Diane Garey, Lawrence R. Hott. DVD, Pbs (Direct), 2007.
  20. ^ a b c d e "Opposing Appoaches". Cochlear War. MSM Productions. 2010. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
  21. ^ a b Hawkins, Larry; Brawner, Judy (August 1997). "Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Total Communication. ERIC Digest #559". Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved 24 January 2011.
  22. ^ Chistiansen, John B.; Barnartt, Sharon N. (1995). Deaf President Now!. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. p. 1. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  23. ^ "The History Behind DPN: What Happened..." Deaf President Now Protest. Gallaudet University. 2011. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  24. ^ a b c d e "The Week of DPN". Deaf President Now Protest. Gallaudet University. 2011. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  25. ^ Chistiansen, John B.; Barnartt, Sharon N. (1995). Deaf President Now!. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press. pp. 68–69. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  26. ^ a b c "The Impact". Deaf President Now Protest. Gallaudet University. 2011. Retrieved 28 April 2011.
  27. ^ Laughton, Joan (August 1997). "Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Cochlear Implants. ERIC Digest #E554". Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  28. ^ a b c Baker, Sharon; Baker, Keith (August 1997). "Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Bilingual-Bicultural Education. ERIC Digest #E553". Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  29. ^ a b Marschark, Marc; Lang, Harry G (2002). Educating Deaf Students. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 145. {{cite book}}: |first3= missing |last3= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); Text "last3Albertini" ignored (help)
  30. ^ a b c Gilliam, Judith; Easterbrooks, Susan (August 1997). "Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Residential Life, ASL, and Deaf Culture. ERIC Digest #558". Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved 23 January 2011.
  31. ^ a b c Stone, Patrick (August 1997). "Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Auditory-Oral. ERIC Digest #E551". Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved 4 February 2012.
  32. ^ a b c Goldberg, Donald (August 1997). "Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Auditory-Verbal. ERIC Digest #E552". Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved 4 February 2012.
  33. ^ . Oral Deaf Education http://www.oraldeafed.org/movies/nkis.html. Retrieved 4 February 2012. {{cite AV media}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  34. ^ Marschark, Marc; Lang, Harry G (2002). Educating Deaf Students. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 143. {{cite book}}: |first3= missing |last3= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help); Text "last3Albertini" ignored (help)
  35. ^ Nowell, Richard; Innes, Joseph (August 1997). "Educating Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Inclusion. ERIC Digest #E557". Education Resources Information Center. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education. Retrieved 25 January 2011.
  36. ^ "School Placement Considerations for Students Who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing". Hands and Voices. 2005. Retrieved 23 January 2011.