System usability scale: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Thatbrock (talk | contribs)
→‎References: deleted commercial reference
Line 20: Line 20:
The System Usability Scale is described in:
The System Usability Scale is described in:
<ul>
<ul>
<li>''Brooke, J. (1996) '''SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale'''. In P W Jordan, B Thomas, B A Weerdmeester & A L McClelland (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.'' The article is also available online on the Serco website [http://www.usability.serco.com/trump/documents/Suschapt.doc]
<li>''Brooke, J. (1996) '''SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale'''. In P W Jordan, B Thomas, B A Weerdmeester & A L McClelland (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.'' </ul>
</ul>


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==

Revision as of 17:04, 11 April 2006

The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a simple, ten-item attitude (Likert) scale giving a global view of subjective assessments of usability. It was developed by John Brooke at Digital Equipment Company in the UK in 1986 as a tool to be used in usability engineering of electronic office systems.

The usability of a system, as defined by the ISO standard ISO 9241 Part 11, can be measured only by taking into account the context of use of the system – i.e., who is using the system, what they are using it for, and the environment in which they are using it. Furthermore, measurements of usability have several different aspects

  • effectiveness (can users successfully achieve their objectives)
  • efficiency (how much effort and resource is expended in achieving those objectives)
  • satisfaction (was the experience satisfactory)


Measures of effectiveness and efficiency are also context specific. Effectiveness in using a system for controlling a continuous industrial process would generally be measured in very different terms to, say, effectiveness in using a word processor. Thus, it can be difficult, if not impossible, to answer the question “is system A more usable than system B”, because the measures of effectiveness and efficiency may be very different. However, it can be argued that given a sufficiently high-level definition of subjective assessments of usability, comparisons can be made between systems.

SUS has generally been seen as providing this type of high-level subjective view of usability and is thus often used in carrying out comparisons of usability between systems.

It has been widely used in the evaluation of a range of systems.

References

The System Usability Scale is described in:

  • Brooke, J. (1996) SUS: a "quick and dirty" usability scale. In P W Jordan, B Thomas, B A Weerdmeester & A L McClelland (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis.

Bibliography

A comparison among diverse psychometric questionnaires can be found at:

  • Thomas S. T., and J. N. Stetson, A Comparison of Questionnaires for Assessing Website Usability, Usability Professional Association Conference, 2004 [1]