Talk:Western European and Others Group: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:19, 17 March 2012

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

International relations: United Nations Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Untitled

This is my first article, starting from scratch, in the Wikipedia. I wanted to add something about the United Nations' regional voting blocs, as little has been written on the subject, yet they play such a major role in the world organization. Any assistance would be appreciated. There is little information on the blocs, not even an official website at the UN or otherwise, so other information such as member officials is hard to come by.

Also, an image I added has not yet shown up, dunno why. But it is under the Wikipedia free license maps if you're wondering about copyright issues.--Larry G 06:51, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Not quite sure how to add things here, so I'll just say it now. Should French Guiana be shaded on this map?

Yes, it should; so should Réunion, Martinique, and Guadeloupe. Quartier Latin1968

20:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right, those four French territories should be shaded, just like Alaska and Hawaii, however only Alaska and French Guiana are visible enough to be shaded on the map. I am just not sure about Greenland. I removed the Holy See from the list, since it is not a UN member state. Dave 22:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well, in your favor, it's your first wikipedia article. But against that, you listed Turkey and Greece under Western Europe. Er.... You could have been more sensitive of a subject that is already very touchy. Given that, for once, there is the luxury of an 'Other' category, you could easily remedy this mistake by putting them there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.254.81.209 (talk) 08:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe he was sensitive about the subject by including Turkey and Greece in Europe. And you are the unsensitive one by leaving them out. The text reads Southern Europe too which clearly includes Turkey and Greece. Unbelivable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.41.1.20 (talk) 13:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus: Are they members or what, they don't seem to be listed under any group80.176.144.237 (talk) 20:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turkey

All other wikipedias says that turkey only belongs to WEOG. so why ppl try to put turkey to asia group ??? 88.64.182.125 (talk) 23:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 Cyprus: Are they members or what, they don't seem to be listed under any group[[Special:Contributions/80.176.144.237|80.176.144.237]] ([[User talk:80.176.144.237|talk]]) 20:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
+== Turkey ==
+All other wikipedias says that turkey only belongs to WEOG. so why ppl try to put turkey to asia group ??? [[Special:Contributions/88.64.182.125|88.64.182.125]] ([[User talk:88.64.182.125|talk]]) 23:19, 17 March 2012 (UTC)