Talk:Someone Comes to Town, Someone Leaves Town: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:52, 19 March 2012

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Novels: Fantasy Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Someonecover.jpg

Image:Someonecover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

The section entitled "Literary significance and criticism" is not cited nor attributed to anybody in particular - ergo it qualifies as original research... wouldn't ya say? 121.223.197.180 (talk) 00:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. 184.153.110.113 (talk) 07:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. It's also completely bizarre. :) 91.154.87.201 (talk) 10:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 The section entitled "Literary significance and criticism" is not cited nor attributed to anybody in particular - ergo it qualifies as original research... wouldn't ya say? [[Special:Contributions/121.223.197.180|121.223.197.180]] ([[User talk:121.223.197.180|talk]]) 00:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Seconded. [[Special:Contributions/184.153.110.113|184.153.110.113]] ([[User talk:184.153.110.113|talk]]) 07:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
+* Agreed. It's also completely bizarre. :)  [[Special:Contributions/91.154.87.201|91.154.87.201]] ([[User talk:91.154.87.201|talk]]) 10:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)