User talk:Mrld

• Welcome!!! If you wish to add something feel free to do so here on my talk page! I will archive past entries once they are no longer important. If you want to see them, feel free to look in the archived talk pages.
  • User:Mrld

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 02:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

X-Files

There is a logical connection in the "see also" between the X-Files and Haven. Both deal with law enforcement covering and investigating the paranormal and supernatural. I believe that is sufficent enough to have a see also link.

Also you seem to undo a lot of the edits others do on the Haven article. Just some friendly advice one article like that isn't worth starting an edit war; one which appears to have already started. It could come to that based on the amount of reverts you have :P .

Cheers

PS saying "There will be repercussions" is uncalled for. I'm pretty sure your not an administrator (neither am I). Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks.

If you've got a problem with someone's edits; don't start an edit war. Find an administrator and let them deal with it. It's not worth making threats to other editors; because really you've got no power above that as a regular editor (like myself).

Mrld (talk) 03:52, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your input. I've already been privy to this, though. Btw, when I suggest to someone that reverting for the 4th time will have repercussions, i am not suggesting that I am going to strap on a pair of six-guns and turn them into swiss cheese. By repercussions, I am referring to the various venues of calling attention to other people's behavioral issues, like AN:3R or, in more dire cases, AN:I. It isn't about power. Never has been. No one has power in Wikipedia. We're all dweebs doing grunt work for free and arguing over who's free work is more valuable than someone else's free work. The idea of Wikipedia is a good one; its just that people's egos get in the way. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 04:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

interested in WW2 history?

Hi, I've noticed your contributions on a number of articles that seem fair and thoughtful. IMO there is an article with a strong bias and terrible presumptions that could use some input from new voices. Please stay impartial and fair minded and please review the article and talk pages at Western Betrayal, any of your contributions would be valuable. 184.36.234.102 (talk) 06:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)