Talk:Bloomberg: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→"Anglicized from...": added missing text |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I think this should be moved to the television station with a dism. call at the top saying the other options. the TV network is by fara nd away today's most important (glboally) "Bloomberg" name (why its buried under here i dont know either)[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 11:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC) |
I think this should be moved to the television station with a dism. call at the top saying the other options. the TV network is by fara nd away today's most important (glboally) "Bloomberg" name (why its buried under here i dont know either)[[User:Lihaas|Lihaas]] ([[User talk:Lihaas|talk]]) 11:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
*I think I disagree with you on that one. If anything, it should redirect to the parent, [[Bloomberg L.P.]]. I would say that [[Bloomberg Terminal]] represents an equally significant product to television, and NewsWeek's circulation is certainly non-trivial. I'd back a redirect to [[Bloomberg L.P.]], though. '''[[User:Fortheloveofbacon|ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon]]''' [[User_talk:Fortheloveofbacon|✉]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fortheloveofbacon|✍]] 07:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== "Anglicized from..." == |
== "Anglicized from..." == |
Revision as of 07:06, 31 March 2012
Disambiguation | ||||
|
Redirect
I think this should be moved to the television station with a dism. call at the top saying the other options. the TV network is by fara nd away today's most important (glboally) "Bloomberg" name (why its buried under here i dont know either)Lihaas (talk) 11:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- I think I disagree with you on that one. If anything, it should redirect to the parent, Bloomberg L.P.. I would say that Bloomberg Terminal represents an equally significant product to television, and NewsWeek's circulation is certainly non-trivial. I'd back a redirect to Bloomberg L.P., though. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 07:06, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
"Anglicized from..."
The statement "Anglicized from Yiddish or German: Blumberg" makes it look like "Blumberg" is the anglicized form. The colon should not be there. Unfortunately the colon comes from a lang-de tag, which I am loath to remove in case it serves some valuable purpose. Could someone fix this, please? — Paul G (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2012 (UTC)