User talk:39.47.46.80

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Inter-Services Intelligence activities in Afghanistan. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Whose sock are you then? Darkness Shines (talk) 20:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have not attacked you. If you call me a sock again you will be blocked. --39.47.46.80 (talk) 20:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

39.47.46.80 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why am I blocked? Please explain? I have edited within policy. --39.47.46.80 (talk) 21:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Why am I blocked? Please explain? I have edited within policy. --[[Special:Contributions/39.47.46.80|39.47.46.80]] ([[User talk:39.47.46.80#top|talk]]) 21:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Why am I blocked? Please explain? I have edited within policy. --[[Special:Contributions/39.47.46.80|39.47.46.80]] ([[User talk:39.47.46.80#top|talk]]) 21:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Why am I blocked? Please explain? I have edited within policy. --[[Special:Contributions/39.47.46.80|39.47.46.80]] ([[User talk:39.47.46.80#top|talk]]) 21:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I have not followed this editor. All these articles were there in search results of ISI ! Did that ever come to your mind? --39.47.46.80 (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I don't buy it. You started following Darkness Shines around – all your edits have something to do with him: you either undo his edits or comment on him/his actions – right off the bat. I call that hounding. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:07, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

His comment was already there on the talk I replied to him when I removed a poor tag. He called me a sock first will you block him too or is he allowed to make personal attack because he has an account? --39.47.46.80 (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

I called you a sock as I am plagued by socks who do exactly what you just did. If I am wrong I am sorry, I just find it difficult to believe you just happened upon 3 articles I created and began reverting me. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

YOu are plagued with socks so you should be blocked for a week so that you know every one who edits your articles is not a sock and start assuming good faith. Why the hell will I follow you ? Editing related article is proof that I searched them. If you created all these POV then you are the real problem of wikipedia. --39.47.46.80 (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I'm not going to block him; I consider his actions in keeping with WP:SPADE. To tell the truth, the idea that you're a sock has crossed my mind too, you know... Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:12, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Why dont you block wikipedia access for IP editors? Do you block all editors who edit articles related to same topic? This editor created all of them. This is serious problem you know some grudge or what? --39.47.46.80 (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

This comment makes me believe you are a sock also[1] That article was never deleted, although one similar has been, the question is of course how do you know of it? Darkness Shines (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Because I commented on that AFD before with the same computer actually Mr innocent. --39.47.46.80 (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)