Talk:Ipse dixit: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 24.209.250.147 - "→The Heinlein example is nonsensical/irrelevant w/o more context: new section" |
Proposal to remove Heinlein example. |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* I agree that [[Ipse-dixitism]] should probably be merged into this, but it is not the same as an argument from authority (aka appeal to authority). The distinction is the source of the statement, and in fact, they're nearly opposites. An ''ipse dixit'' is when the speaker is the source of a statement or assertion with no further attribution (he himself has said it -- ''ipse dixit''), while an appeal to authority is when the speaker makes an assertion based on a statement by a (perceived) authority. [[User:Cmadler|cmadler]] ([[User talk:Cmadler|talk]]) 13:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
* I agree that [[Ipse-dixitism]] should probably be merged into this, but it is not the same as an argument from authority (aka appeal to authority). The distinction is the source of the statement, and in fact, they're nearly opposites. An ''ipse dixit'' is when the speaker is the source of a statement or assertion with no further attribution (he himself has said it -- ''ipse dixit''), while an appeal to authority is when the speaker makes an assertion based on a statement by a (perceived) authority. [[User:Cmadler|cmadler]] ([[User talk:Cmadler|talk]]) 13:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
* I also agree that ''ipse dixit'' is the opposite of an argument from authority. [[User:Acabre|Acabre]] ([[User talk:Acabre|talk]]) 18:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' merge from [[Ipse-dixitism]] - both articles are near-stubs and there is considerable overlap. ('''Oppose''' merge with [[Argument by authority]] per [[User:Cmadler|cmadler]]). [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 15:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
* '''Support''' merge from [[Ipse-dixitism]] - both articles are near-stubs and there is considerable overlap. ('''Oppose''' merge with [[Argument by authority]] per [[User:Cmadler|cmadler]]). [[User:SteveBaker|SteveBaker]] ([[User talk:SteveBaker|talk]]) 15:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
It's probably me, I can't find my login info. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.209.250.147|24.209.250.147]] ([[User talk:24.209.250.147|talk]]) 15:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
It's probably me, I can't find my login info. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.209.250.147|24.209.250.147]] ([[User talk:24.209.250.147|talk]]) 15:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
* Agreed, this makes no sense and is completely irrelevant other than the fact that it happens to include the words "ipse dixit." I vote it should be removed. [[User:Acabre|Acabre]] ([[User talk:Acabre|talk]]) 18:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:09, 2 April 2012
Law Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Latin Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Philosophy: Logic / Medieval Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
Should the article Ipse-dixitism be merged into this? It is little more than a note on a play on the words "ipse dixit" by Bentham - whose wordplay was (to try to be complimentary) strenuous. Though perhaps the temptation to proceed further out, into "Non-ipse-dixitism", should now be resisted. That's what I think, anyhow. But I'm not an authority on logic. --Wikiain (talk) 04:38, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Also this is a perfect duplicate of Argument by authority. They should be merged. Ceplm (talk) 11:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- I agree that Ipse-dixitism should probably be merged into this, but it is not the same as an argument from authority (aka appeal to authority). The distinction is the source of the statement, and in fact, they're nearly opposites. An ipse dixit is when the speaker is the source of a statement or assertion with no further attribution (he himself has said it -- ipse dixit), while an appeal to authority is when the speaker makes an assertion based on a statement by a (perceived) authority. cmadler (talk) 13:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- I also agree that ipse dixit is the opposite of an argument from authority. Acabre (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support merge from Ipse-dixitism - both articles are near-stubs and there is considerable overlap. (Oppose merge with Argument by authority per cmadler). SteveBaker (talk) 15:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- (I added mergefrom/mergeto tags to the two articles involved and to the last few significant editors of them.) SteveBaker (talk) 16:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- While it's been quite a while, the results above clearly support a merge (and I agree); I'm going to complete it now. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- I've completed the merge. I did not merge any of the unsourced stuff from Ipse-dixitism, except for the one statement about Bentham coining the phrase, as I imagine that's probably correct. No need to bring over unverified stuff and make this article worse. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
The Heinlein example is nonsensical/irrelevant w/o more context
"The Martian roundhead Willis announces that he wants to stay with his human friend Jim."
OK...
"Doctor MacRae says, "Ipse dixit - keep him with you."
Says... to whom, Jim?
"Frank asks, "What does ipse dixit mean?" MacRae replies, "It means, 'He sure said a mouthful'."
Who in the hell is Frank, and where did he come from...?
It's probably me, I can't find my login info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.209.250.147 (talk) 15:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed, this makes no sense and is completely irrelevant other than the fact that it happens to include the words "ipse dixit." I vote it should be removed. Acabre (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Stub-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Stub-Class Latin articles
- Low-importance Latin articles
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Stub-Class Medieval philosophy articles
- Low-importance Medieval philosophy articles
- Medieval philosophy task force articles