User talk:212.139.103.26: Difference between revisions
Valenciano (talk | contribs) advice |
→April 2012: attempt to enter into a discussion about politically biased censorship |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==April 2012== |
==April 2012== |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/212.139.103.26|your contributions]]. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|general rule]], talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not general discussion]] about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting [[Wikipedia:Reference desk|our reference desk]] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat1 --> [[User:Valenciano|Valenciano]] ([[User talk:Valenciano|talk]]) 02:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for [[Special:Contributions/212.139.103.26|your contributions]]. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|general rule]], talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#FORUM|not general discussion]] about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting [[Wikipedia:Reference desk|our reference desk]] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat1 --> [[User:Valenciano|Valenciano]] ([[User talk:Valenciano|talk]]) 02:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
Hello again Valenciano - the page appears to be heavily biased, one wonders why you personally find a 'controversies' section, or even the suggestion of one, so offensive as to censor it? Several similar edits have come from IP addresses within the Houses of Parliament - from users who's talk pages fly 'conservative' or 'liberal democrat' supporters flags. |
|||
I'd really like to write an article for the Mail on Sunday on this issue - and since you personally (along with several people working inside the Commons) feel so strongly that a list of 13 suicides by disabled people (attributed by impartial Inquest juries have attributed to either DWP cuts to benefits, or inept Atos assessments that have led to benefit cuts) should not be put on Wiki, I'd be interested to know |
|||
a) who you are, and |
|||
b) why you feel it imperative to repeatedly remove this list of suicides under a series of wholly unsupportable ruses without even attempting a discussion? - it breaches none of the Wiki policies you have cited to date. And certainly, blocking pages carrying this content on the eve of the LibDem conference does seem to indicate you feel you have a censorship role. |
|||
For all we know, you could be IDS yourself :) |
|||
Revision as of 13:19, 6 April 2012
April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 02:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello again Valenciano - the page appears to be heavily biased, one wonders why you personally find a 'controversies' section, or even the suggestion of one, so offensive as to censor it? Several similar edits have come from IP addresses within the Houses of Parliament - from users who's talk pages fly 'conservative' or 'liberal democrat' supporters flags.
I'd really like to write an article for the Mail on Sunday on this issue - and since you personally (along with several people working inside the Commons) feel so strongly that a list of 13 suicides by disabled people (attributed by impartial Inquest juries have attributed to either DWP cuts to benefits, or inept Atos assessments that have led to benefit cuts) should not be put on Wiki, I'd be interested to know a) who you are, and b) why you feel it imperative to repeatedly remove this list of suicides under a series of wholly unsupportable ruses without even attempting a discussion? - it breaches none of the Wiki policies you have cited to date. And certainly, blocking pages carrying this content on the eve of the LibDem conference does seem to indicate you feel you have a censorship role.
For all we know, you could be IDS yourself :)