User:Hsokolow/sandbox

{{{Working Draft}}} Gestalt Laws of Grouping A major aspect of Gestalt psychology is that it implies that the mind understands external stimuli as whole rather than the sum of their parts. The wholes are structured and organized using grouping laws. The various laws have called laws and principles depending on the paper in which they are discussed but for simplicity sake this article will use the term laws. These laws deal with the sensory modality vision however there are analogous laws for other sensory modalities including auditory, tactile, gustatory and olfactory (Bregman - GP). The visual Gestalt principles of grouping were introduced in Wertheimer (1923). Through the 30’s and 40’ Wertheimer, Kohler and Koffka were said to have founded the gestalt approach to studying perception.

Law of Proximity – The law of proximity states that when an individual perceives an assortment of objects they perceive objects that are close to each other as forming a group. For example, in the figure illustrating the Law of Proximity, there are 72 circles in total, but we perceive the collection of circles to be in groups. Specifically, we perceive there to be a group of 36 circles on the left side of the image, and three groups of 12 circles on the right side of the image. This law is often used in advertising logos to emphasize which aspects of events are associated.

Law of Similarity – The law of similarities states that elements within an assortment of objects will be perceptually grouped together if they are similar to each other. This similarity can occur in the form of shape, colour, shading or other qualities. For example, the figure illustrating the law of similarity portrays 36 circles all equal distance apart from one another forming a square. In this depiction, 18 of the circles are shaded dark and 18 of the circles are shaded light. We perceive the dark circles to be grouped together and the light circles to be grouped together forming six horizontal lines within the square of circles. This perception of lines is due to the Law of similarity.

Law of Closure – The law of closure states that individuals perceive objects such as shapes, letters, pictures, etc., as being whole when they not complete. Specifically, when parts of a whole picture are missing, our perception fills in the visual gap. Research has shown that the purpose of completing a regular figure that is not perceived through sensation is in order to increase the regularity of surrounding stimuli. For example, the figure depicting the law of closure portrays what we perceive to be a circle on the left side of the image and a square on the right side of the image. However, there are gaps missing from the shapes. If the law of closure did not exist, the image would depict an assortment of different lines with different lengths, rotations and curvatures, but with the law of closure, we perceptually combine the lines into whole shapes.

Law of Symmetry – The law of symmetry states that the mind perceives objects as being symmetrical and forming around a center point. It is perceptually pleasing to be able to divide objects into an even number of symmetrical parts. Therefore, when two symmetrical elements are unconnected the mind perceptually connects them to form a coherent shape. Similarities between symmetrical objects increase the likelihood that objects will be grouped to form a combined symmetrical object. For example, the figure depicting the law of symmetry shows a configuration of square and curled brackets. When the image is perceived, we tend to observe three pairs of symmetrical brackets rather than six individual brackets.

Law of Common Fate – The law of common fate states that objects are perceived as lines that move along the smoothest path. Experiments using the visual sensory modality found that movement of elements of an object produce paths individuals perceive objects to be on. We perceive elements of objects to have trends of motion, which indicate the path that the object is on. The law of continuity implies the grouping together of objects have the same trend of motion and are therefore on the same path. For example, if there are an array of dots and half the dots are moving upward while the other half are moving downward, we would perceive the upward moving dots and the downward moving dots as two distinct units.

Law of Continuity – The law of continuity state that elements of objects tend to be grouped together, and therefore integrated into perceptual wholes if they are aligned within an object.

Law of Good Gestalt – The law of good gestalt explains that elements of objects tend to be perceptually grouped together if they form a pattern that is regular, simple and orderly. This law implies that as individuals perceive the world, they eliminate complexities and unfamiliarity’s in order to observe a reality in its most simplistic form. The elimination of extraneous stimuli aids the mind in creating meaning. This meaning created by perception implies a global regularity, which is often mentally prioritized over spatial relations. The law of good gestalt focuses on the idea of conciseness which is what all of gestalt theory is based on. This law has also been called the law of Prägnanz. Prägnanz is a German word that directly translates to mean “pithiness” and implies the ideas of salience, conciseness and orderliness.

Law of Past Experience – The law of past experience implies that under some circumstances visual stimuli are categorized according to past experience. If two objects tend to be observed within close proximity, or small temporal intervals, the objects are more likely to be perceived together. For example, the English language, which contains 26 letters are grouped to form words using a set of rules. If an individual reads an English word that they have never come across they use the Law of past experience to interpret the letter’s “L” and “I” as two letters beside eachother, rather than using the law of closure to combine the letters and interpret the object as an uppercase U.

The gestalt laws of grouping have recently been subjected to modern methods of scientific evaluation by examining the visual cortex using cortical algorithms. Current Gestalt Psychologists have described their findings, which showed correlations between physical visual representations of objects and self-report perception as the laws of seeing. (G-P)

http://www.clevelandconsultinggroup.com/articles/emergence-gestalt-approach-to-change.php - figure ground/emergence/laws

http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/gestalt_principles_of_form_perception.html

http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Gestalt_principles

The first change that I plan to make to this article is to incorporate a historical background for Gestalt psychology into the article . The book by Ash (1995) explores the history of the first attempt to advance holistic thought through natural science. It explains early research that occurred from the 1890-1967 in Germany. Within the brief history I plan to discuss the origin of the word “gestalt.” Gestalt is a German word-meaning pattern or configuration. (Sherrill, 2005). I further plan to write a brief historical background regarding the political environment in Germany during the time that Gestalt psychology was in the rise. Specifically, the psychologists struggled with the anti-modern, irrational Nazi government on the rise and further had to deal with the impact of the Cold war (Ash, 1995).

Secondly, many articles focus on comparing and contrasting Gestalt psychology and Gestalt Theory from Gestalt Therapy. Gestalt psychology stems from the tradition of Naturwissenschaften while Gestalt therapy is from the tradition of Geitesiuissenschaften. There are fundamental differences between Gestalt psychology and Gestalt Therapy. It has been argued that Gestalt psychology is a science with the aim of providing a scientific explanation, while the main aim of gestalt therapy is to build understanding. It has been argued that Gestalt psychology theory dissipated because behaviorism began to dominate the field of psychology making it difficult for Gestalt psychologists to find students (Shane, 2003). It is important to note that while some psychologists say that gestalt therapy has stemmed from Gestalt psychology others argue that the two fields in fact have nothing in common (Henle, 2003). Shane (2005) argued that it was in fact the growth of Gestalt therapy that caused a spreading misunderstanding of Gestalt psychology and ultimately caused the downfall of Gestalt Psychology.

It is also important to examine the applications of Gestalt theory in Gestalt therapy, clinical psychology and psychopathology (Crochetier, Vicker, Parker, Brett & Wertheimer, 2001). Gestalt psychology has been used to study a number of psychological disorders and potential treatment therapies including gestalt psychoanalysis, the rejection of unconscious processes, and schizophrenia (Silverstein & Uhlaas, 2004). Notably, because of the integrating of Gestalt psychology into general psychology, gestalt therapy has also become linked to traditional therapy (Emerson & Smith, 1974). I will conclude this section by commenting on suggestions for how Gestalt therapy can be more grounded in Gestalt tradition (Sherrill, 1986).

Finally, I plan to do an overview of how research is done in the field. I will do an overview of animal research, described by Kressley (2006), and how it portrayed a conceptual orientation and experimental methodology. I am still researching a variety of human psychological studies that adequately outline the progression of human research in Gestalt psychology.

I am having an extremely difficult time figuring out how to make references with in text citations. For this part of the assignment, I have been using APA formatting, but I am hoping that I will be able to arrange a meeting in order to gain some extra help with how to reference.

Hartman something something

references

Ash, M. G. (1995). Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890-1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Crochetiere, K., Vicker, N., Parker, J., Brett, K. D., & Wertheimer, M. (2001). Gestalt theory and psychopathology: Some early applications of Gestalt theory to clinical psychology and psychopathology. Gestalt Theory. 23(2), 144-154.

Ellis W. D. (1938). A source book of Gestalt psychology. London, England: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Company.

Emerson, P., & Smith, E. W. (1974). Contributions of Gestalt psychology to Gestalt therapy. The Counseling Psychologist. 4(4), 8-12.

Hartmann, G. W. (1935). Gestalt psychology: A survey of facts and principles. New York: Ronald Press Company.

Henle, M. (2003). Gestalt psychology and Gestalt therapy. International Gestalt Journal. 26(2), 7-22.

Kressley, R. A. (2006). Gestalt psychology: Its paradigm-shaping influence on animal psychology. Gestalt Theory. 28(3) 259-269.

Renshaw, S., & Helson, H. (1926). Review of the psychology of Gestalt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 10(3), 400-402.

Shane, P. (2005). Return of the prodigal daughter: Historiography and the relationship between Gestal Psychology and Gestalt therapy (Laura Perls). ProQuest Information and Learning. 66(3), 1703.

Sherril, R. (1986). Gestalt therapy and Gestalt Psychology. Gestalt Journal. 9(2). 53-66.

Sherril, R. (2005). Figure/ground: Gestalt therapy/Gestalt Psychology relationships with some neurological implications. ProQuest Information and Learning. 65(7), 3724.

Silverstein, S. M., & Uhlhaas, P. J. (2004). Gestalt psychology: The forgotten paradigm in abnormal psychology. The American Journal of Psychology. 117(2), 259-277.

Woodworth, R. S. (1948). Gestalt Psychology. New York: Ronald Press Company.

Woody, W. D. (2001). Gestalt psychology and William James. Advances in Psychology Research. 3, 191-206.