Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zulkifli Abdhir: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*'''Relisting comment'''. Only Colapeninsula has provided a "keep" rationale that's grounded in policy. Since this is a [[WP:BLP|BLP]], more input would be helpful. --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Relisting comment'''. Only Colapeninsula has provided a "keep" rationale that's grounded in policy. Since this is a [[WP:BLP|BLP]], more input would be helpful. --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 00:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' the sources present within the article appear to demonstrate notability, thus [[WP:GNG]] threshold appears to be met. [[User:Till I Go Home|''Till I Go Home'']] ([[User talk:Till I Go Home|talk]]) 05:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' the sources present within the article appear to demonstrate notability, thus [[WP:GNG]] threshold appears to be met. [[User:Till I Go Home|''Till I Go Home'']] ([[User talk:Till I Go Home|talk]]) 05:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - per [[WP:GNG]].--[[User:BabbaQ|BabbaQ]] ([[User talk:BabbaQ|talk]]) 11:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:28, 28 April 2012
- Zulkifli Abdhir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject may meet the notability criteria; however, it is written like a wanted poster. Wikipedia is not America's Most Wanted and this article would require a complete rewrite to be encyclopedic. Prod removed by article creator. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep I've rewritten and added references. He's notable as the subject of press coverage over a span of several years[1][2][3][4] --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- (Although the article still needs some work.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:38, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, tag with advert template and move along. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 01:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep doesn't seem like spam. Bmusician 09:16, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Relisting comment. Only Colapeninsula has provided a "keep" rationale that's grounded in policy. Since this is a BLP, more input would be helpful. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep the sources present within the article appear to demonstrate notability, thus WP:GNG threshold appears to be met. Till I Go Home (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)