Jump to content

Talk:Queen Mary Harp: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 86.147.4.60 - ""
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


How about some consideration for the ethics of Wikipedia? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.147.4.60|86.147.4.60]] ([[User talk:86.147.4.60|talk]]) 23:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
How about some consideration for the ethics of Wikipedia? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.147.4.60|86.147.4.60]] ([[User talk:86.147.4.60|talk]]) 23:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Advertising!!!! ==

Some pious soul has put a banner on the "replicas" section highlighting that it looks like an advertisement. Well, he/she has been very kind. There ''is'' a link ''to a CD sales page''!!!!! I am not removing the section in respect of the (little) information it contains, and as the names and surnames should stay there with the banner as long as possible, as an example of misconduct. [[Special:Contributions/86.186.176.98|86.186.176.98]] ([[User talk:86.186.176.98|talk]]) 07:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:54, 28 May 2012

WikiProject iconMiddle Ages Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ethics

This article is a gem. Section "Replicas": publicity to David Kortier, to his distributor (Historical Harp Society of Ireland) and to a specific CD, by a tutor affiliated to said Historical Harp Society. Section "Recent Study": references to material not in the public domain, whose detailed content is known to the Author (K Loomis), again affiliate to this Historical Harp Society, and few others only.

Outrageous.

How about some consideration for the ethics of Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.4.60 (talk) 23:27, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising!!!!

Some pious soul has put a banner on the "replicas" section highlighting that it looks like an advertisement. Well, he/she has been very kind. There is a link to a CD sales page!!!!! I am not removing the section in respect of the (little) information it contains, and as the names and surnames should stay there with the banner as long as possible, as an example of misconduct. 86.186.176.98 (talk) 07:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]