Jump to content

Talk:Adobe LiveCycle: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
extend project
Line 5: Line 5:


Yes, this entry is terrible. It's all marketing nonsense and doesn't really give much information about what the heck the services are or what they do. I'm tempted to start editing out the marketing-speak but until I have a better understanding of the technology and can add the real analysis I will hold off. [[User:Patniemeyer|patniemeyer]] ([[User talk:Patniemeyer|talk]]) 13:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, this entry is terrible. It's all marketing nonsense and doesn't really give much information about what the heck the services are or what they do. I'm tempted to start editing out the marketing-speak but until I have a better understanding of the technology and can add the real analysis I will hold off. [[User:Patniemeyer|patniemeyer]] ([[User talk:Patniemeyer|talk]]) 13:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

== mmm... why Adobe Live Cycle edited? ==

Because Wrongful Page. Roland has been fix it.

Revision as of 07:43, 29 May 2012

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

What about including the history of the product? 203.134.124.36 (talk) 22:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody cares to provide something more than a marketing pitch? For example, how is this technology different/better that the standard HTML, Ajax, HTML + Flash? 194.14.75.136 (talk) 10:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this entry is terrible. It's all marketing nonsense and doesn't really give much information about what the heck the services are or what they do. I'm tempted to start editing out the marketing-speak but until I have a better understanding of the technology and can add the real analysis I will hold off. patniemeyer (talk) 13:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

mmm... why Adobe Live Cycle edited?

Because Wrongful Page. Roland has been fix it.