Jump to content

User talk:Expert in the art of slow slicing: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tiptoety (talk | contribs)
unblock declined
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock reviewed | 1=A mistake has clearly been made as I have never previously been blocked on wikipedia, and thus am not evading a block | decline=[[WP:CHECKUSER|CheckUser]] says otherwise. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 23:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=A mistake has clearly been made as I have never previously been blocked on wikipedia, and thus am not evading a block | decline=[[WP:CHECKUSER|CheckUser]] says otherwise. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 23:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)}}

{{unblock|How can that be? Must be a mistake, some klind of technical glitch. Why was a CU being conducted anyway?}}

Revision as of 23:25, 30 May 2012

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Expert in the art of slow slicing (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

A mistake has clearly been made as I have never previously been blocked on wikipedia, and thus am not evading a block

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Expert in the art of slow slicing (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How can that be? Must be a mistake, some klind of technical glitch. Why was a CU being conducted anyway?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=How can that be? Must be a mistake, some klind of technical glitch. Why was a CU being conducted anyway? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=How can that be? Must be a mistake, some klind of technical glitch. Why was a CU being conducted anyway? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=How can that be? Must be a mistake, some klind of technical glitch. Why was a CU being conducted anyway? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}