User talk:DietFoodstamp

Welcome!

Hello, DietFoodstamp, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name, or live online at IRC. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For grammar improvements on various articles. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 00:44, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Walter Mignolo

I'm willing to discuss the Kimberley Curtis issue, because that's just a WP:NPOV problem; I've started a discussion on that article's talk page. But the information you re-added to Walter Mignolo violates WP:BLP, and that means it must remain out until you get consensus to add it. If you look to Talk:Walter Mignolo, you'll see that the issue has already been discussed and consensus was formed to not include that info. Mignolo's involvement in that event is trivial; simply being one of 88 people to sign something is not notable enough to include in the article, and putting it there is essentially trying to tarnish him by association. Curtis had much more involvement in the scandal, since she was sued directly, which is why I left that part in her article. But Mignolo did not do anything other than sign. YOu are, of course, welcome to start a discussion on that article's talk page to try to change the existing consensus. But re-adding before that consensus is reaching is not allowed, since WP:BLP is in play. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I did take a look at that and I cannot find where the consensus to not add the information is in either of the two sections. It sure looks like the "consensus" was that there were IP addresses coming through, leaving you wanting a block. It wasn't about the information, but about how they added it. Being a signatory on the open letter (and subsequently the clarification letter) is absolutely significant and worth inclusion. As I added it, the content didn't even take up it's own section. I will start a new thread on that page after I bring it back because you are obviously trying to "synthesize" the consensus. I will also respond on the Kimberly Curtis page and hopefully we can reach a consensus. Best Regards, DietFoodstamp (talk) 19:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, my mistake about the history on Mignolo. But the discussion is open now, so we can continue it there. If necessary, we can use dispute resolution. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

CSD A7 on Jangoo Chapkhana

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I have challenged your WP:CSD A7 on Jangoo Chapkhana. In my opinion, the claim regarding credits for critically acclaimed performances is a sufficient claim of importance to meet the very low threshold of criteria A7. While the subject may or may not be notable, notability is a much higher standard and should be considered at either AfD or with a PROD. Monty₈₄₅ 17:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok--that works, but just saying something is 'critically-acclaimed' without actually referencing or sourcing such claims does not alleviate the burden. User:Bgwhite looks to have already put it up for PROD so I will leave it at that. DietFoodstamp (talk) 01:18, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Let's join hands?

Hi. I was wondering if you could join hands with me in expanding the article Tuberculosis in India, started by me. I see that you take keen interest in developing knowledge and gathering information. As far as the article is concerned, that has just come into babe and it would be nice to have your collaboration and assistance in copy editing, gathering context and sources for the same. Let me know your views. By the way, I tend to be a good friend/ :-) VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  10:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey there--no problem, I'm always looking to learn new stuff and like to edit articles I'm not too familiar with so I can add some knowledge. I'll be dropping in and attempting to add bits to the article here and there, but I don't have the time/research done to write up the whole framework. I'll be very glad to help you out, though. Take care DietFoodstamp (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2012 (UTC)