Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunnic Empire: Difference between revisions
Bulwersator (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
According to AfD on plwiki this incorrect article is being translated to multiple wikis (""...In the Kazakh steppes, additional tribes joined, forming a new tribal union: the Huns. [...] Attila, a Hunnic chieftain [...] plundered Roman lands, seeking loot and tribute, '''not territorial conquests'''. [...] When Attila died [...] his confederation quickly collapsed. The Huns melted back into the steppe, occasionally appearing as Roman mercenaries.[...] Despite their ferocious reputations, the Huns, east and west, were never a threat to the existence of China or the Roman Empire." " P. Golden, "Central Asia in World History", pages. 33-34", Peter B. Golden: An introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples: ethnogenesis and state-formation in medieval and early modern Eurasia and the Middle East mentions that it at the best case Atilla created confederation, certainly not state/empire) [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
According to AfD on plwiki this incorrect article is being translated to multiple wikis (""...In the Kazakh steppes, additional tribes joined, forming a new tribal union: the Huns. [...] Attila, a Hunnic chieftain [...] plundered Roman lands, seeking loot and tribute, '''not territorial conquests'''. [...] When Attila died [...] his confederation quickly collapsed. The Huns melted back into the steppe, occasionally appearing as Roman mercenaries.[...] Despite their ferocious reputations, the Huns, east and west, were never a threat to the existence of China or the Roman Empire." " P. Golden, "Central Asia in World History", pages. 33-34", Peter B. Golden: An introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples: ethnogenesis and state-formation in medieval and early modern Eurasia and the Middle East mentions that it at the best case Atilla created confederation, certainly not state/empire) [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
*link - [[:pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2012:06:20:Imperium Hunów]] [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
*link - [[:pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2012:06:20:Imperium Hunów]] [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
*The map in this article is totally incorrect, the Huns have never controlled southern Lithuania, Pomerania and Mecklenburg. There are not any hunnic artifacts found in the southern coast of Baltic Sea. [[User:Hoa binh|Hoa binh]] ([[User talk:Hoa binh|talk]]) 11:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:29, 21 June 2012
- Hunnic Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
According to AfD on plwiki this incorrect article is being translated to multiple wikis (""...In the Kazakh steppes, additional tribes joined, forming a new tribal union: the Huns. [...] Attila, a Hunnic chieftain [...] plundered Roman lands, seeking loot and tribute, not territorial conquests. [...] When Attila died [...] his confederation quickly collapsed. The Huns melted back into the steppe, occasionally appearing as Roman mercenaries.[...] Despite their ferocious reputations, the Huns, east and west, were never a threat to the existence of China or the Roman Empire." " P. Golden, "Central Asia in World History", pages. 33-34", Peter B. Golden: An introduction to the history of the Turkic peoples: ethnogenesis and state-formation in medieval and early modern Eurasia and the Middle East mentions that it at the best case Atilla created confederation, certainly not state/empire) Bulwersator (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- link - pl:Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artykuły/2012:06:20:Imperium Hunów Bulwersator (talk) 10:57, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- The map in this article is totally incorrect, the Huns have never controlled southern Lithuania, Pomerania and Mecklenburg. There are not any hunnic artifacts found in the southern coast of Baltic Sea. Hoa binh (talk) 11:29, 21 June 2012 (UTC)