Jump to content

Talk:Rodarte: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Camaroman (talk | contribs)
Line 19: Line 19:
4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
5. the article is not based primarily on such sources. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Camaroman|Camaroman]] ([[User talk:Camaroman|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Camaroman|contribs]]) 18:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
5. the article is not based primarily on such sources. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Camaroman|Camaroman]] ([[User talk:Camaroman|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Camaroman|contribs]]) 18:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Reinserted, according to our guidelines the material is OK, no self-published sources. --[[User:Catgut|Catgut]] ([[User talk:Catgut|talk]]) 13:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:43, 22 June 2012

Paring Down celebrity list

I was thinking that there's probably no need to list every celebrity who's worn the label, although that's more of a personal preference (at least I think it it, I haven't gone through the manual of style to see if there's a guideline somewhere). thoughts? --Bfigura (talk) 05:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Black Swan Controversy Removed

Wikipedia:Verifiability

"Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer."

Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves Policy shortcuts: WP:ABOUTSELF WP:SELFPUB

Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the requirement in the case of self-published sources that they be published experts in the field, so long as:

  1. the material is not unduly self-serving;
  2. it does not involve claims about third parties;
  3. it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
  4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity;
  5. the article is not based primarily on such sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camaroman (talkcontribs) 18:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

Reinserted, according to our guidelines the material is OK, no self-published sources. --Catgut (talk) 13:43, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]