Talk:Single-mode optical fiber: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:13, 4 July 2012

Glass Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

"Currently, data rates of up to 10 Gigabits/second are possible at distances of over 60 km with commercially available transceivers"

Surely, we can do better than that? That's the capacity of a single OC-192, and my understanding is that many OC-192s can be run over a single fiber at different wavelengths. From the article on DWDM:

"The first WDM systems combined two signals and appeared around 1985. Modern systems can handle up to 160 signals and can expand a basic 10 Gbit/s fibre system to a theoretical total capacity of over 1.6 Tbit/s over a single fiber pair."

--Jsnow 23:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Connectors

Why does this article spend a lot of time giving information on connectors which is not specific to single-mode fibers? Perhaps these portions should be moved to the optical fiber article.- Winston Spencer (talk) 03:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent focus on TeleCom operator view only

As currently written, the article sounds like it is written entirely from the viewpoint, needs and standards of (US) telecom operators such as AT&T. Terminology, naming and even standards may be different in other relevant industries, such as the computer industry and the medical/photographic industry. Terms such as "outside plant", "customer premises" and references to Telcordia standards all seem to be from a Telecom viewpoint.

It may be a good idea to also describe this type of fiber-optic cabling as it is used outside telecom companies, e.g. for cabling in large computer installations. 77.215.46.17 (talk) 02:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==Discussion of Connectors==
 Why does this article spend a lot of time giving information on connectors which is not specific to single-mode fibers? Perhaps these portions should be moved to the optical fiber article.- [[User:Winston Spencer|Winston Spencer]] ([[User talk:Winston Spencer|talk]]) 03:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
+==Apparent focus on TeleCom operator view only==
+As currently written, the article sounds like it is written entirely from the viewpoint, needs and standards of (US) telecom operators such as [[AT&amp;T]].  Terminology, naming and even standards may be different in other relevant industries, such as the computer industry and the medical/photographic industry.  Terms such as "outside plant", "customer premises" and references to Telcordia standards all seem to be from a Telecom viewpoint.
+It may be a good idea to also describe this type of fiber-optic cabling as it is used outside telecom companies, e.g. for cabling in large computer installations. [[Special:Contributions/77.215.46.17|77.215.46.17]] ([[User talk:77.215.46.17|talk]]) 02:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)