Jump to content

User talk:Iamthemuffinman: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Response
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
::::The IP was hardly being ridiculed, and people were actually being incredibly patient with them. It was explained to 2.99.69.69 several times about why the Norway shootings were left out this year, why the Colorado shootings will be left out next year, and it was explained to the IP why their tone and language were inappropriate. If 2.99.69.69 had started the discussion without assuming some sort of wrongdoing on the behalf of others I suspect the thread would still be continuing. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:51, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
::::The IP was hardly being ridiculed, and people were actually being incredibly patient with them. It was explained to 2.99.69.69 several times about why the Norway shootings were left out this year, why the Colorado shootings will be left out next year, and it was explained to the IP why their tone and language were inappropriate. If 2.99.69.69 had started the discussion without assuming some sort of wrongdoing on the behalf of others I suspect the thread would still be continuing. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 19:51, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you.
: I sincerely do encourage you to start another discussion with a more civil tone than the last one, although I disagree that there is bias. 9/11 was missing two years in a row, and not a peep was heard, and I find that the main page is just as likely to have a large proportion of British content. [[User:Zazaban|Zazaban]] ([[User talk:Zazaban|talk]]) 19:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:53, 22 July 2012

July 2012

If you continue to revert, you will likely receive a block. Acalamari 19:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Iamthemuffinman, it ceased being a legitimate debate when the insults and personal attacks started, which was from the first post onwards. Start a new section if you want a civil discussion on the matter. Zazaban (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What's the point? It's clear you don't wish to discuss it, it's clear that you were ridiculing the IP and it is absolutely clear that you don't give a stuff about the matter, why waste my time? What a joke. You, and every editor responsible for removing that debate should be ashamed. Iamthemuffinman (talk) 19:40, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The IP was hardly being ridiculed, and people were actually being incredibly patient with them. It was explained to 2.99.69.69 several times about why the Norway shootings were left out this year, why the Colorado shootings will be left out next year, and it was explained to the IP why their tone and language were inappropriate. If 2.99.69.69 had started the discussion without assuming some sort of wrongdoing on the behalf of others I suspect the thread would still be continuing. Acalamari 19:51, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

I sincerely do encourage you to start another discussion with a more civil tone than the last one, although I disagree that there is bias. 9/11 was missing two years in a row, and not a peep was heard, and I find that the main page is just as likely to have a large proportion of British content. Zazaban (talk) 19:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]