User talk:146.50.227.1

July 2012

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — raekyt 21:34, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh come on already. If that's an attack, I'm being attacked by entire pages on wikipedia. What a weak-ass excuse for not having an actual argument against the truth over posted lies by said 'attacked' editor. 146.50.227.1 (talk) 21:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

That is a personal attack,

That is NOT an attack, it's fact. He IS a complete partial dimwit, and you know it. Stop being so horribly fake about it. You can read, can't you? 146.50.227.1 (talk) 22:05, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Agreed, that was not an attack. It was merely pointing out who should be blocked or banned or at least accused for lying. 86.93.250.232 (talk) 07:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

read WP:NPA. You've been warned, and are being watched. — raekyt 21:42, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

What you're doing now isn't WP:NPA ? How blatantly silly are you. Stop messing on my user-page, why don't you? I view your babble as personal attacks from now on. 146.50.227.1 (talk) 21:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

And this is also a personal attack. This will not make you win any arguments. --OpenFuture (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

It's called telling the truth. The fact that your kind can't handle that is not my problem. You're way too soft on those who tell lies everywhere on wikipedia. And you know it! 146.50.227.1 (talk) 21:58, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I would have to agree with that. Posting blatant lies should be punished harder on wikipedia. Immediate blocks would be a good idea. 80.57.196.126 (talk) 22:12, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Both of you appear to have no purpose in being on Wikipedia

So you decide some have no purpose in being on wikipedia? Who are you to decide that for others if I may ask? Who do you think you are, Jimmy Whales? 77.250.14.113 (talk) 07:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

except to make personal attacks. If it continues, you will be blocked. At least for 146.50.227.1, because that's whose Talk page I'm writing this, consider this your only warning.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Ooh we're sooo scared! What a bunch of losers you are. Your power-hungry behavior is what's wrong with WikiPedia 77.165.205.63 (talk) 07:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Both IP's geolocate to the same city, so.... One's a school IP, other appears to be a consumer broadband connection... — raekyt 22:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

What is this nonsense? So because my IP geo-locates to the same country as someone from the University (apparently), I must be one and the same? I got here through a video by Peter Joseph, posted to facebook. I have nothing to do with either of you. I was reading his/her message and rather liked it actually. If you must know, we're not so fond of wikipedia's censoring police over here. I'll show you I'm not alone in that if you want. (I'll post this on my fb timeline..) 80.57.196.126 (talk) 07:22, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm with you. And with Peter on what he says in this video about wikipedia's editors: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRI8QSpD3_s I too got here through facebook and Peter's video. Wikipedia's editing wars end in favor of those with a lot of time on their hands, obviously that's not 'fair'. And by the way, I don't regard each and every ad hominem as misplaced. There are exceptions, especially when people are obviously lying their asses off.. 77.250.14.113 (talk) 07:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Consider me in. I'm with Peter on that. The editors that win wars are the ones who are unemployed, or disabled or otherwise home/computer-bound for life. Personal attacks are great and effective in showing us who's boss! ;-) 77.165.205.63 (talk) 07:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Me too! :-) 86.93.250.232 (talk) 07:46, 23 July 2012 (UTC)