User talk:165.125.180.10: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:You said - "In the southern Indian ocean, subtropical cyclones are not to be named regardless of strength" - which is false. --♫ [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 03:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC) |
:You said - "In the southern Indian ocean, subtropical cyclones are not to be named regardless of strength" - which is false. --♫ [[User:Hurricanehink|Hurricanehink]] (<small>[[User_talk:Hurricanehink|talk]]</small>) 03:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
That's is a true statement. It is just as true as saying that a tropical depression is not to be named. (There had been various tropical depressions being named for whatsoever error or discrepancy between agencies.)[[Special:Contributions/165.125.180.10|165.125.180.10]] ([[User talk:165.125.180.10#top|talk]]) 03:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC) |
That's is a true statement. It is just as true as saying that a tropical depression is not to be named. (There had been various tropical depressions being named for whatsoever error or discrepancy between agencies.) Something not to happen can indeed happen in some cases. If there is not the word "to be", then it is false.[[Special:Contributions/165.125.180.10|165.125.180.10]] ([[User talk:165.125.180.10#top|talk]]) 03:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 03:11, 17 August 2012
August 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jason Rees (talk) 14:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
As an outsider, it might be better to talk and discuss, instead of keeping on reverting. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- How can you say that SWIO storms aren't named? Joel 10, Dando 12, both were subtropical and were named! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Be careful. I did not say that are never named. I say they are not to be named as there is only provision to name MTS. However, subregional centers have the right to name them as MTS even when RSMC disagrees. Joel and Dando only demonstrate the disagreement between subregional centers and RSMC, which is already stated in the paragraph.165.125.180.10 (talk) 02:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Joel and Dando are just a small fraction of the disprancy between subregional centers and RSMC. There had been a lot more named subtropical system/TD and unnamed MTS in the past. It is impossible to claim whether a type of system is always named or always not named. However, it's possible to claim whether a type of system is to be named or not to be named. It is nice to mention the disprancy as well.165.125.180.10 (talk) 02:59, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- You said - "In the southern Indian ocean, subtropical cyclones are not to be named regardless of strength" - which is false. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
That's is a true statement. It is just as true as saying that a tropical depression is not to be named. (There had been various tropical depressions being named for whatsoever error or discrepancy between agencies.) Something not to happen can indeed happen in some cases. If there is not the word "to be", then it is false.165.125.180.10 (talk) 03:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)