Jump to content

User talk:71.168.223.101: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎A barnstar for you!: new WikiLove message
Line 22: Line 22:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For averting an edit war by finding an acceptable compromise. [[User:Jprg1966|<font color="crimson glory"><b>Jprg1966</b></font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jprg1966|<font color="#003366"><sup>(talk)</sup></font>]] 18:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For averting an edit war by finding an acceptable compromise. [[User:Jprg1966|<font color="crimson glory"><b>Jprg1966</b></font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Jprg1966|<font color="#003366"><sup>(talk)</sup></font>]] 18:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
|}
|}
Haha, thank you!
I would be happy to write the lead! I will do my best to keep it neutral.

Revision as of 16:08, 30 August 2012

August 2012

Hello, I'm Jprg1966. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Third party (United States) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jprg1966 (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 71.168.223.101. You have new messages at Jprg1966's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:17, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

edits on third party

In response to jprg1966, in edit at 2:33pm on August 29 I have simply rearranged the content of the article which he has reverted to. No changes in content have been made. The rearrangements were an attempt to eliminate the two-party bias that was evident in the previous version. While the comments were neutral, the arrangement seemed to be an attempt to deter voters from third party candidates.

I am impressed with your compromise solution. It does not alter the article's quality or tone, but shifts emphasis slightly.
There is one last issue, which is that now there is not much of a lead. Perhaps a neutral summary of the rest of the page would be doable? If you don't feel like writing, it you can mark the page with {{Lead too short|date=August 2012}}. --Jprg1966 (talk) 18:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
For averting an edit war by finding an acceptable compromise. Jprg1966 (talk) 18:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thank you! I would be happy to write the lead! I will do my best to keep it neutral.