Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 September 7: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Oxycut (talk | contribs)
Oxycut (talk | contribs)
Line 32: Line 32:
:* '''Propose deleting''' [[:Category:Monorchism]] - {{lc1|Monorchism}}<br />
:* '''Propose deleting''' [[:Category:Monorchism]] - {{lc1|Monorchism}}<br />
:'''Nominator's rationale:''' '''Delete''' This is this editor's third attempt at creating this category in some form or another (see [[:Category:Monorchid people]] and [[:Category:Monorchistic people]]). The editor is well aware that the other two categories are nominated for deletion and that all other editors have so far agreed that these categories need to go. At this stage, creating this category is [[WP:POINT|pure disruption]]. [[User:Pichpich|Pichpich]] ([[User talk:Pichpich|talk]]) 00:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
:'''Nominator's rationale:''' '''Delete''' This is this editor's third attempt at creating this category in some form or another (see [[:Category:Monorchid people]] and [[:Category:Monorchistic people]]). The editor is well aware that the other two categories are nominated for deletion and that all other editors have so far agreed that these categories need to go. At this stage, creating this category is [[WP:POINT|pure disruption]]. [[User:Pichpich|Pichpich]] ([[User talk:Pichpich|talk]]) 00:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
'''Keep''' I submit that there should be one category for the people named 'Monorchid people' and a category for the nonintersecting qualifying condition 'Monorchism'. [[:Category:Amputation]] and [[:Category:Amputees]], in similarity, already exist but don't seem to precisely apply. Same with [[:Category:Castration]] and [[:Category:Castrated people]].
'''Keep''' I submit that there should be one category for the people named 'Monorchid people' and a category for the nonintersecting qualifying condition 'Monorchism'. [[:Category:Amputations]] and [[:Category:Amputees]], in similarity, already exist but don't seem to precisely apply. Same with [[:Category:Castration]] and [[:Category:Castrated people]]. What are alternative suggestions for addressing this gap in coverage/treatment of the subject matter as far as categorisation for the individuals affected and the syndrome they have in common?[[User:Oxycut|Oxycut]] ([[User talk:Oxycut|talk]]) 00:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
<!-- Please add the newest nominations to the top -->
<!-- Please add the newest nominations to the top -->

Revision as of 00:50, 7 September 2012

September 7

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:20th-century Roman Catholic church buildings by decade

Nominator's rationale: Rename. Normal building tree category name. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:30, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1930s

Nominator's rationale: Rename. By decade categories add an unnecessary level of navigation. Virtually all building categories are organized on a by year or by century basis and they do not pose a navigation issue. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Monorchism

Nominator's rationale: Delete This is this editor's third attempt at creating this category in some form or another (see Category:Monorchid people and Category:Monorchistic people). The editor is well aware that the other two categories are nominated for deletion and that all other editors have so far agreed that these categories need to go. At this stage, creating this category is pure disruption. Pichpich (talk) 00:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I submit that there should be one category for the people named 'Monorchid people' and a category for the nonintersecting qualifying condition 'Monorchism'. Category:Amputations and Category:Amputees, in similarity, already exist but don't seem to precisely apply. Same with Category:Castration and Category:Castrated people. What are alternative suggestions for addressing this gap in coverage/treatment of the subject matter as far as categorisation for the individuals affected and the syndrome they have in common?Oxycut (talk) 00:50, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]