Talk:List of rum brands: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:36, 9 September 2012

Spirits List‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

List

This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Bombay Rum

I have heard several people talk about Bombay Rum, apparently from India, but I cannot find it or even much reference to it on the web. Does it exist? Is it called something else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.224.178.159 (talk) 19:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinks

Many of the wikilinks here link to the wrong place. Someone should go through and check all of them. Rees11 (talk) 13:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Centenario

User Ian.thomson deleted[1] the addition of 'Ron Centenario' from Costa Rica with the only explanation "non-notable". Yet, a quick search for 'Ron Centenario' on google gives over 7 million hits. Unless there is some particular reason this is considered non-notable I will add it again. 85.230.137.182 (talk) 17:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does it meet the general notability guidelines of this site? Just because something exists does not mean it belongs on this site. Are there reliable (as defined by this site) third-party publications (unaffiliated with Ron Centenario) that discuss Ron Centenario? Simply having Google hits does not mean that someone or something is notable. 17:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

What would you consider a reliable source for rum notability that the other items on the list meet?85.230.137.182 (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the reliable sourcing guidelines. Publications unaffiliated with Ron Centenario that are not self-published (i.e. no blogs, no forum posts, no user-submitted reviews, and no wikis) discussing Ron Centenario for more than a fleeting mention would work. It's not what I consider notable, it's the site's guidelines. Ian.thomson (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but could you give some examples of some of the other rums on the list, say the 'St. Lucia Distillers' one for example? 85.230.137.182 (talk) 17:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ::What would you consider a reliable source for rum notability that the other items on the list meet?[[Special:Contributions/85.230.137.182|85.230.137.182]] ([[User talk:85.230.137.182|talk]]) 17:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 :::[[WP:RS|Here are the reliable sourcing guidelines]].  Publications unaffiliated with Ron Centenario that are not self-published (i.e. no blogs, no forum posts, no user-submitted reviews, and no wikis) discussing Ron Centenario for more than a fleeting mention would work.  It's not what I consider notable, it's the site's guidelines.  [[User:Ian.thomson|Ian.thomson]] ([[User talk:Ian.thomson|talk]]) 17:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
+::::Yes, but could you give some examples of some of the other rums on the list, say the 'St. Lucia Distillers' one for example? [[Special:Contributions/85.230.137.182|85.230.137.182]] ([[User talk:85.230.137.182|talk]]) 17:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)