User talk:Z554

Ok...now what?

Now what.

Now you could explain your dropping a POV tag on Esh Kodesh without explaining what problems you have with it on the talk page so that we can understand and then discuss why you think the article is not neutral.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

I included an explanation in the edit summary. Z554 (talk) 22:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Not enough. See explanation at Template:POV. In particular, "The editor placing this template in an article should promptly provide a reason on the article's talk page. In the absence of a reason and it is not clear what the neutrality issue is, this tag may be removed by any editor."— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do the same at Israeli settlement‎. Help us help you to be happy.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

1RR

You should self-revert your reversion of my edit. You're in violation of 1RR at Israeli settlement. If you don't know what that means you should read up on it from the links in the big ARBCOM template at the top of the talk page there. But you should revert yourself first, please?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

You cannot unilaterally remove a POV designation while it is under discussion. Z554 (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

I didn't unilaterally remove it. Another editor removed it too. And your discussion is ignoring fundamental principles of wikipedia. Edit warring is bad, though. You should think about stopping it and self-reverting.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

I would have thought one of the "fundamental principles of wikipedia" included objective fact. The removal was unilateral. There was no "consensus". Z554 (talk) 00:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

For better or worse, none of the fundamental principles of wikipedia include fact, objective or otherwise. Read Wikipedia:Verifiability. You ought to try learning how things work around here before you jump in with both feet. Maybe you can get a mentor or something?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

"...none of the fundamental principles of wikipedia include fact, objective or otherwise." Q.E.D. Z554 (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Please consider actually reading the principles of wikipedia before continuing your edit warring at Israeli settlement.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

see here

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Z554_reported_by_User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah_.28Result:_.29 1RR violation report.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 07:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violation of the 1RR restriction per WP:ARBPIA on the page Esh Kodesh. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 15:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

Warning: Discretionary sanctions on all Israel/Palestine-related articles

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Heimstern Läufer (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2012 (UTC)