Jump to content

Streptavidin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Journal cites, added 1 DOI, added 1 issue number, using AWB (8087)
Fentlehan (talk | contribs)
m →‎Origins of the high affinity: "suggesting" is better than "alluding to", which would imply that the phenomenon in question had an intention.
Line 26: Line 26:


==Origins of the high affinity==
==Origins of the high affinity==
The numerous crystal structures of the streptavidin-biotin complex have shed light on the origins of the remarkable affinity. Firstly, there is high shape complementarity between the binding pocket and biotin. Secondly, there is an extensive network of hydrogen bonds formed to biotin when in the binding site. There are eight [[hydrogen bonds]] directly made to residues in the binding site (the so called 'first shell' of hydrogen bonding), involving residues Asn23, Tyr43, Ser27, Ser45, Asn49, Ser88, Thr90 and Asp128. There is also a 'second shell' of hydrogen bonding involving residues that interact with the first shell residues. However, the streptavidin-biotin affinity exceeds that which would be predicted from the hydrogen bonding interactions alone, alluding to another mechanism contributing to the high affinity.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dechancie |first1=Jason |last2=Houk |first2=K. N. |title=The Origins of Femtomolar Protein–Ligand Binding: Hydrogen Bond Cooperativity and Desolvation Energetics in the Biotin–(Strept)Avidin Binding Site |journal=Journal of the American Chemical Society |volume=129 |issue=17 |pages=5419–29 |year=2007 |pmid=17417839 |pmc=2527462 |doi=10.1021/ja066950n}}</ref> The biotin-binding pocket is [[hydrophobic]], and there are numerous [[van der Waals]] contacts and hydrophobic interactions made to the biotin when in the pocket, which is also thought to account for the high affinity. In particular, the pocket is lined with conserved tryptophan residues. Lastly, biotin binding is accompanied by the stabilisation of a flexible loop connecting B strands 3 and 4 (L3/4), which closes over the bound biotin, acting like a 'lid' over the binding pocket and contributing to the extremely slow biotin dissociation rate.
The numerous crystal structures of the streptavidin-biotin complex have shed light on the origins of the remarkable affinity. Firstly, there is high shape complementarity between the binding pocket and biotin. Secondly, there is an extensive network of hydrogen bonds formed to biotin when in the binding site. There are eight [[hydrogen bonds]] directly made to residues in the binding site (the so called 'first shell' of hydrogen bonding), involving residues Asn23, Tyr43, Ser27, Ser45, Asn49, Ser88, Thr90 and Asp128. There is also a 'second shell' of hydrogen bonding involving residues that interact with the first shell residues. However, the streptavidin-biotin affinity exceeds that which would be predicted from the hydrogen bonding interactions alone, suggesting another mechanism contributing to the high affinity.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dechancie |first1=Jason |last2=Houk |first2=K. N. |title=The Origins of Femtomolar Protein–Ligand Binding: Hydrogen Bond Cooperativity and Desolvation Energetics in the Biotin–(Strept)Avidin Binding Site |journal=Journal of the American Chemical Society |volume=129 |issue=17 |pages=5419–29 |year=2007 |pmid=17417839 |pmc=2527462 |doi=10.1021/ja066950n}}</ref> The biotin-binding pocket is [[hydrophobic]], and there are numerous [[van der Waals]] contacts and hydrophobic interactions made to the biotin when in the pocket, which is also thought to account for the high affinity. In particular, the pocket is lined with conserved tryptophan residues. Lastly, biotin binding is accompanied by the stabilisation of a flexible loop connecting B strands 3 and 4 (L3/4), which closes over the bound biotin, acting like a 'lid' over the binding pocket and contributing to the extremely slow biotin dissociation rate.


Most attempts at mutating streptavidin result in a lowered biotin-binding affinity, which is to be expected in such a highly optimised system. However, a recently engineered mutant of streptavidin, named traptavidin, was found to have more than ten-fold slower biotin dissociation, in addition to higher thermal and mechanical stability <ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chivers |first1=Claire E |last2=Crozat |first2=Estelle |last3=Chu |first3=Calvin |last4=Moy |first4=Vincent T |last5=Sherratt |first5=David J |last6=Howarth |first6=Mark |title=A streptavidin variant with slower biotin dissociation and increased mechanostability |journal=Nature Methods |volume=7 |issue=5 |pages=391–3 |year=2010 |pmid=20383133 |pmc=2862113 |doi=10.1038/nmeth.1450}}</ref>, [http://users.ox.ac.uk/~bioc0756/MyWebs/activesite/ReagentDistribution.htm distributed] by Oxford Dept. of Biochemistry. This decreased dissociation rate was accompanied by a two-fold decrease in the association rate.
Most attempts at mutating streptavidin result in a lowered biotin-binding affinity, which is to be expected in such a highly optimised system. However, a recently engineered mutant of streptavidin, named traptavidin, was found to have more than ten-fold slower biotin dissociation, in addition to higher thermal and mechanical stability <ref>{{cite journal |last1=Chivers |first1=Claire E |last2=Crozat |first2=Estelle |last3=Chu |first3=Calvin |last4=Moy |first4=Vincent T |last5=Sherratt |first5=David J |last6=Howarth |first6=Mark |title=A streptavidin variant with slower biotin dissociation and increased mechanostability |journal=Nature Methods |volume=7 |issue=5 |pages=391–3 |year=2010 |pmid=20383133 |pmc=2862113 |doi=10.1038/nmeth.1450}}</ref>, [http://users.ox.ac.uk/~bioc0756/MyWebs/activesite/ReagentDistribution.htm distributed] by Oxford Dept. of Biochemistry. This decreased dissociation rate was accompanied by a two-fold decrease in the association rate.

Revision as of 20:59, 18 September 2012

Avidin family
Monomeric streptavidin (ribbon diagram) with bound biotin (spheres)
Identifiers
Symbol?
PfamPF01382
InterProIPR005468
PROSITEPDOC00499
SCOP21slf / SCOPe / SUPFAM
Available protein structures:
Pfam  structures / ECOD  
PDBRCSB PDB; PDBe; PDBj
PDBsumstructure summary

Streptavidin (/[invalid input: 'icon']ˌstrɛpˈtævədən/) is a 60 kDa protein purified from the bacterium Streptomyces avidinii. Streptavidin homo-tetramers have an extraordinarily high affinity for biotin (also known as vitamin B7). With a dissociation constant (Kd) on the order of ≈10−14 mol/L,[1] the binding of biotin to streptavidin is one of the strongest non-covalent interactions known in nature. Streptavidin is used extensively in molecular biology and bionanotechnology due to the streptavidin-biotin complex's resistance to organic solvents, denaturants (e.g. guanidinium chloride), detergents (e.g. SDS, Triton), proteolytic enzymes, and extremes of temperature and pH.

Structure

Tetrameric structure of streptavidin with 2 bound biotins

The crystal structure of streptavidin with biotin bound was first solved in 1989 by Hendrickson et al.[2] and as of February 2012, there are 135 structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. See this link for a complete list. The N and C termini of the 159 residue full-length protein are processed to give a shorter ‘core’ streptavidin, usually composed of residues 13 - 139; removal of the N and C termini is necessary for the high biotin-binding affinity. The secondary structure of a streptavidin monomer is composed of eight antiparallel β-strands, which fold to give an antiparallel beta barrel tertiary structure. A biotin binding-site is located at one end of each β-barrel. Four identical streptavidin monomers (i.e. four identical β-barrels) associate to give streptavidin’s tetrameric quaternary structure. The biotin binding-site in each barrel consists of residues from the interior of the barrel, together with a conserved Trp120 from neighbouring subunit. In this way, each subunit contributes to the binding site on the neighbouring subunit, and so the tetramer can also be considered a dimer of functional dimers.

Origins of the high affinity

The numerous crystal structures of the streptavidin-biotin complex have shed light on the origins of the remarkable affinity. Firstly, there is high shape complementarity between the binding pocket and biotin. Secondly, there is an extensive network of hydrogen bonds formed to biotin when in the binding site. There are eight hydrogen bonds directly made to residues in the binding site (the so called 'first shell' of hydrogen bonding), involving residues Asn23, Tyr43, Ser27, Ser45, Asn49, Ser88, Thr90 and Asp128. There is also a 'second shell' of hydrogen bonding involving residues that interact with the first shell residues. However, the streptavidin-biotin affinity exceeds that which would be predicted from the hydrogen bonding interactions alone, suggesting another mechanism contributing to the high affinity.[3] The biotin-binding pocket is hydrophobic, and there are numerous van der Waals contacts and hydrophobic interactions made to the biotin when in the pocket, which is also thought to account for the high affinity. In particular, the pocket is lined with conserved tryptophan residues. Lastly, biotin binding is accompanied by the stabilisation of a flexible loop connecting B strands 3 and 4 (L3/4), which closes over the bound biotin, acting like a 'lid' over the binding pocket and contributing to the extremely slow biotin dissociation rate.

Most attempts at mutating streptavidin result in a lowered biotin-binding affinity, which is to be expected in such a highly optimised system. However, a recently engineered mutant of streptavidin, named traptavidin, was found to have more than ten-fold slower biotin dissociation, in addition to higher thermal and mechanical stability [4], distributed by Oxford Dept. of Biochemistry. This decreased dissociation rate was accompanied by a two-fold decrease in the association rate.

Uses in Biotechnology

Among the most common uses are the purification or detection of various biomolecules. The strong streptavidin-biotin bond can be used to attach various biomolecules to one another or onto a solid support. Harsh conditions are needed to break the streptavidin-biotin interaction, which often denatures the protein of interest being purified. However, it has been shown that a short incubation in water above 70°C will reversibly break the interaction without denaturing streptavidin, allowing re-use of the streptavidin solid support.[5] A further application is the so called Strep-tag, which is an optimized system for the purification and detection of proteins. Streptavidin is widely used in Western blotting and immunoassays conjugated to some reporter molecule, such as horseradish peroxidase. Streptavidin has also been used in the developing field of Nanobiotechnology, the use of biological molecules such as proteins or lipids to create nanoscale devices/structures. In this context streptavidin can be used as a building block to link biotinylated DNA molecules to create single walled carbon nanotube scaffolds [6] or even complex DNA polyhedra [7]. The tetrameric streptavidin has also been used as a hub around which other proteins may be arranged either by genetic fusion or an affinity tag such as Strep-tag or Avitag. As well as a molecular force probe for atomic force microscopy studies [8], novel materials such as 3D crystalline lattices [9] have also been created

Pretargetted Immunotherapy

This uses streptavidin conjugated to a monoclonal antibody against cancer cell-specific antigens followed by an injection of radiolabelled biotin, to deliver the radiation only to the cancerous cell. Initial hurdles involve saturation of the biotin binding sites on streptavidin with endogenous biotin instead of the injected radiolabelled biotin, and a high degree of radioactive exposure in the kidneys, due to streptavidin’s strong cell adsorptive properties. It is currently thought that this high level of binding to adherent cell types, such as activated platelets and melanomas, is a result of integrin binding mediated through the RYD sequence in streptavidin.[10]

Monovalent streptavidin compared to Monomeric streptavidin

Streptavidin is a tetramer and each subunit binds biotin with equal affinity. Multivalency is an advantage in some applications, for example where avidity effects improve the ability of molecules attached to streptavidin to detect specific T cells.[11] In other cases, such as the use of streptavidin for imaging specific proteins on cells, multivalency can perturb the function of the protein of interest. Monovalent streptavidin is an engineered recombinant form of streptavidin which is a tetramer but only one of the four binding sites is functional. This single binding site has 10−14 mol/L affinity and cannot cause cross-linking [12]. Monovalent streptavidin is distributed from Oxford.

Monomeric streptavidin is a recombinant form of streptavidin with mutations to break the tetramer into a monomer and to enhance the solubility of the resultant isolated subunit. Monomeric streptavidin versions have an affinity for biotin of 10−7mol/L 10−8mol/L and so are not ideal for labeling applications but are useful for purification, where reversibility is desirable.[13][14]

Comparison to avidin

Streptavidin is not the only protein capable of binding to biotin with high affinity. Avidin is the other most notable biotin-binding protein. Originally isolated from egg white, avidin only has 30% sequence identity to streptavidin, but almost identical secondary, tertiary and quaternary structure. It has a higher affinity for biotin (Kd ~ 10−15M) but in contrast to streptavidin, it is glycosylated, positively charged, has pseudo-catalytic activity (it can enhance the alkaline hydrolysis of an ester linkage between biotin and a nitrophenyl group) and has a higher tendency for aggregation. Also, streptavidin is the better biotin-conjugate binder; avidin has a lower binding affinity than streptavidin when biotin is conjugated to another molecule, despite avidin having the higher affinity for free, unconjugated biotin.

Streptavidin has a mildly acidic isoelectric point (pI) of ~5, but a recombinant form of streptavidin with a near-neutral pI is also commercially available. Because streptavidin lacks any carbohydrate modification and has a near-neutral pI, it has the advantage of much lower nonspecific binding than avidin. Deglycosylated avidin (NeutrAvidin) is more comparable to the size, pI and nonspecific binding of streptavidin.

References

  1. ^ Green, NM (1975). "Avidin". Advances in protein chemistry. 29: 85–133. PMID 237414.
  2. ^ Hendrickson, W. A. (1989). "Crystal Structure of Core Streptavidin Determined from Multiwavelength Anomalous Diffraction of Synchrotron Radiation". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 86 (7): 2190–4. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.7.2190.
  3. ^ Dechancie, Jason; Houk, K. N. (2007). "The Origins of Femtomolar Protein–Ligand Binding: Hydrogen Bond Cooperativity and Desolvation Energetics in the Biotin–(Strept)Avidin Binding Site". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129 (17): 5419–29. doi:10.1021/ja066950n. PMC 2527462. PMID 17417839.
  4. ^ Chivers, Claire E; Crozat, Estelle; Chu, Calvin; Moy, Vincent T; Sherratt, David J; Howarth, Mark (2010). "A streptavidin variant with slower biotin dissociation and increased mechanostability". Nature Methods. 7 (5): 391–3. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1450. PMC 2862113. PMID 20383133.
  5. ^ Holmberg, Anders; Blomstergren, Anna; Nord, Olof; Lukacs, Morten; Lundeberg, Joakim; Uhlén, Mathias (2005). "The biotin-streptavidin interaction can be reversibly broken using water at elevated temperatures". Electrophoresis. 26 (3): 501–10. doi:10.1002/elps.200410070. PMID 15690449.
  6. ^ Osojic, GN; Hersam, MC (2012). "Biomolecule-Directed Assembly of Self-Supported, Nanoporous, Conductive, and Luminescent Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Scaffolds". Small. 8 (12): 1840–5. doi:10.1002/smll.201102536. PMID 22461319. {{cite journal}}: Text "epub" ignored (help)
  7. ^ Zhang, C; Tian, C; Guo, F; Liu, Z; Jiang, W; Mao, C (2012). "DNA-Directed Three-Dimensional Protein Organisation". Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 15 (14): 3382–3385. doi:10.1002/anie.201108710. PMID 22374892.
  8. ^ Kim, M; Wang, CC; Benedetti, F; Marszalek, PE (2012). "A Nanoscale Force Probe for Gauging Intermolecular Interactions". Angew Chem Int Ed. 51 (8): 1903–1906. doi:10.1002/anie.201107210. PMID 22253141.
  9. ^ Sinclair, JC; Davies, KM; Vénien-Bryan, C; Noble, EM (2011). "Generation of protein lattices by fusing proteins with matching rotational symmetry". Nat Nanotechnol. 6 (9): 558–562. doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.122. PMID 21804552.
  10. ^ Alon, R; Bayer, EA; Wilchek, M (1992). "Cell-adhesive properties of streptavidin are mediated by the exposure of an RGD-like RYD site". European Journal of Cell Biology. 58 (2): 271–9. PMID 1425765.
  11. ^ Xu, X; Screaton, GR (2002). "MHC/peptide tetramer-based studies of T cell function". Journal of Immunological Methods. 268 (1): 21–8. doi:10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00196-5. PMID 12213339.
  12. ^ Howarth, Mark; Chinnapen, Daniel J-F; Gerrow, Kimberly; Dorrestein, Pieter C; Grandy, Melanie R; Kelleher, Neil L; El-Husseini, Alaa; Ting, Alice Y (2006). "A monovalent streptavidin with a single femtomolar biotin binding site". Nature Methods. 3 (4): 267–73. doi:10.1038/nmeth861. PMC 2576293. PMID 16554831.
  13. ^ Wu, S.-C.; Wong, SL (2005). "Engineering Soluble Monomeric Streptavidin with Reversible Biotin Binding Capability". Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280 (24): 23225–31. doi:10.1074/jbc.M501733200. PMID 15840576.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  14. ^ Lim, K (2011). "Engineered streptavidin monomer and dimer with improved stability and function". Biochemistry. 50 (40): 8682–91. doi:10.1021/bi2010366. PMID 21892837.

Further reading

Groups investigating and developing streptavidin or avidin-family proteins (Alphabetical order)