Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another: Difference between revisions
Ottawahitech (talk | contribs) removed Category:2012 case law; added Category:2012 in case law using HotCat |
Linking Batswana - don't change Batswana to Botswana. Batswana is the name of the Tswana people, and Botswana is the name of the place where they live. |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
|italic title = |
|italic title = |
||
}} |
}} |
||
'''''Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another''''' is a 2012 case of the [[Politics_of_Botswana#Judicial_branch|High Court of Botswana]] in which three sisters disputed their nephew's right to inherit the family home under customary inheritance laws that favored male descendants.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/library/item/mmusi_and_others_v_ramantele |title=Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another |publisher=Southern Africa Litigation Centre |archivedate=12 October 2012 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6BN9aYyUy |accessdate=12 October 2012}}</ref><ref name=BBC /> The court ruled that these laws were unconstitutional, asserting for the first time the right of Batswana women [[women's property rights|to inherit property]].<ref name=BBC>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-19924723 |title=Botswana women allowed to inherit |date=12 October 2012 |publisher=BBC News |archivedate=12 October 2012 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6BMipqKtv |accessdate=12 October 2012}}</ref> |
'''''Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another''''' is a 2012 case of the [[Politics_of_Botswana#Judicial_branch|High Court of Botswana]] in which three sisters disputed their nephew's right to inherit the family home under customary inheritance laws that favored male descendants.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/library/item/mmusi_and_others_v_ramantele |title=Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another |publisher=Southern Africa Litigation Centre |archivedate=12 October 2012 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6BN9aYyUy |accessdate=12 October 2012}}</ref><ref name=BBC /> The court ruled that these laws were unconstitutional, asserting for the first time the right of [[Batswana]] women [[women's property rights|to inherit property]].<ref name=BBC>{{cite web |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-19924723 |title=Botswana women allowed to inherit |date=12 October 2012 |publisher=BBC News |archivedate=12 October 2012 |archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6BMipqKtv |accessdate=12 October 2012}}</ref> |
||
== Background == |
== Background == |
Revision as of 12:35, 13 October 2012
Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another | |
---|---|
Court | High Court of Botswana |
Decided | 12 October 2012 |
Court membership | |
Judge sitting | Key Dingake |
Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another is a 2012 case of the High Court of Botswana in which three sisters disputed their nephew's right to inherit the family home under customary inheritance laws that favored male descendants.[1][2] The court ruled that these laws were unconstitutional, asserting for the first time the right of Batswana women to inherit property.[2]
Background
As of 2012, Botswana has a gender gap below the global average.[3] Considered an "example to the region", the country is home to several of Southern Africa's most powerful women, including a parliamentary speaker, an attorney general, and a judge, Unity Dow. However, it is also governed by a dual legal system consisting of the government's civil courts and traditional customary courts, the latter found primarily in rural areas. The customary courts have traditionally upheld the principle of "assumed male inheritance".[4]
Mmusi case
In 2007, Edith Mmusi and her sisters, all of whom were over 65, brought a case against their nephew Molefi Ramantele, who had inherited the family home near Kanye under local laws which allowed only male inheritance.[2][3] The estate had previously passed from Mmusi's parents to her brother, who subsequently willed the home to an older half-brother, the father of Molefi Ramantele. When Ramantele's father died, Ramantele attempted to evict Mmusi and her sisters, who had occupied the home until this point. The sisters contested the eviction, arguing that they had paid for the home's upkeep costs as well as expanding it.[2]
The 2007 case was heard in customary court, which found in Ramantele's favor. After an appeal failed, the sisters took the case to Botswana's civil courts.[2] The suit eventually reached the High Court, where it was heard by a progressive judge, Key Dingake.[4] The sisters were opposed by Attorney General Athalia Molokomme. Representing the government of Botswana, Molokomme argued that though the inheritance law was discriminatory, the "public mood" did not yet support its repeal.[2][3] The sisters were supported in the case by the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC).[4]
On 12 October 2012, Dingake ruled that the local customary laws prioritizing male inheritance were not in keeping with the promise of gender equality in the Constitution of Botswana, and awarded the home to the sisters. In his judgement, Dingake stated, "It seems to me that the time has now arisen for the justices of this court to assume the role of the judicial midwife and assist in the birth of a new world struggling to be born. Discrimination against gender has no place in our modern day society."[4]
Edith Mmusi hailed the case as "a great day for us", while Ramantele called it "a sad day", stating that "People should learn to respect our culture".[2] Regional human rights campaigners expressed hope that the case would not only be a landmark in Botswana, but also set a precedent for surrounding countries grappling with similar issues.[4] The Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa described it as "a huge boost to the struggle for gender equality",[5] while SALC's deputy director said that the ruling "sends a very strong signal that women in Botswana cannot be discriminated against and that the days of women suffering from secondary status under the law in Botswana are drawing to an end".[6]
References
- ^ "Mmusi and Others v Ramantele and Another". Southern Africa Litigation Centre. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
- ^ a b c d e f g "Botswana women allowed to inherit". BBC News. 12 October 2012. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
- ^ a b c Refentse Moyo (12 October 2012). "Botswana court rules women can inherit". Agence France-Presse. Google News. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
- ^ a b c d e Aislinn Laing (12 October 2012). "Women can inherit the earth rules Botswana judge". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
- ^ Richard Lee (12 October 2012). "Botswana: Huge Boost for Women's Rights". Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa via allafrica.com. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.
- ^ "In Brief: Botswana court rules women are no longer second-class citizens". Integrated Regional Information Networks. 12 October 2012. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 12 October 2012.