This article is within the scope of WikiProject Botswana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Botswana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BotswanaWikipedia:WikiProject BotswanaTemplate:WikiProject BotswanaBotswana articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Normally in American jurisprudence, articles for notable cases are shortened to a base of primary plaintiff v. primary defendant. I think this article's title ought to be shortened to Mmusi v Ramantele, to follow a similar format. --Kitch(Talk : Contrib)16:44, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is this the same in Botswana jurisprudence? Without a source that refers to this case by your proposed new title, I'd be uncomfortable changing it. Khazar2 (talk) 17:13, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
