User talk:Ligulem: Difference between revisions
→Update: cmt |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Please note that I'm currently rather inactive on this wiki. --[[User:Ligulem|Ligulem]] ([[User talk:Ligulem#top|talk]]) 10:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC) |
'''Please note that I'm currently rather inactive on this wiki. --[[User:Ligulem|Ligulem]] ([[User talk:Ligulem#top|talk]]) 10:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster. == |
|||
Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster. |
|||
Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help. |
|||
I feel [[User:Loremaster|Loremaster]] is editing [[Singularitarianism]] and [[Technological utopianism]] in a biased manner in accordance with his '''Save The Earth''' propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards [[Neo-Luddism]]. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion: |
|||
:Loremaster says he is: {{quotation|"...critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms."}} |
|||
:Loremaster wants people to: {{quotation|"...stop indulging in techno-utopian fantasies... ...so that we can all focus on energies on saving the planet."}} |
|||
:Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states: {{quotation|"Although I am convinced that the world is in fact heading toward an ecological catastrophe, I think it can be averted and my optimism makes me want to fight to do do just that."}} |
|||
[[Special:Contributions/81.151.135.248|81.151.135.248]] ([[User talk:81.151.135.248|talk]]) 11:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)JB |
|||
#LOL |
|||
#Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a [[technorealism|technorealist]] who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the [[Technological utopianism]] or [[Singularitarianism]] articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book [[Citizen Cyborg]]). |
|||
#I find it disgusting that [[Special:Contributions/81.151.135.248|81.151.135.248]] would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment. |
|||
#In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia. |
|||
--[[User:Loremaster|Loremaster]] ([[User talk:Loremaster|talk]]) 00:38, 20 December 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== File:Section-edit-IE7-WinXP-SP2-2007-02-14.png listed for deletion == |
|||
A file that you uploaded or altered, [[:File:Section-edit-IE7-WinXP-SP2-2007-02-14.png]], has been listed at [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion]]. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 April 13#File:Section-edit-IE7-WinXP-SP2-2007-02-14.png|'''discussion''']] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. <!-- Template:Fdw --> [[User:Cloudbound|Cloudbound]] ([[User talk:Cloudbound|talk]]) 21:49, 13 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:Country data Romania]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Country data Romania]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Country data Romania|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Loginnigol|Loginnigol]] ([[User talk:Loginnigol|talk]]) 13:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
==Notice of change== |
==Notice of change== |
||
Revision as of 09:29, 24 December 2012
Please note that I'm currently rather inactive on this wiki. --Ligulem (talk) 10:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Update
That's odd you weren't notified, because the rights [://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log/rights?page=User%3ALigulem%40enwiki were] removed. To get them back, you should leave a note at WP:BN asking for them back and be sure to point out you were not notified of their removal. MBisanz talk 18:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)