User:CogPsyProf/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
CogPsyProf (talk | contribs) moved citation |
CogPsyProf (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
'''bold''' |
'''bold''' |
||
[[Bold|bold]] |
[[Bold|bold]] |
||
Being [[boldness|bold]] is important in Wikipedia<ref name=Broughton>{{cite book|last=Broughton|first=John|title=Wikipedia : the missing manual|year=2008|publisher=O'Reilly|location=Beijing|isbn=0-596-51516-2|edition=1st ed.}}</ref> |
Being [[boldness|bold]] is important in Wikipedia<ref name=Broughton>{{cite book|last=Broughton|first=John|title=Wikipedia : the missing manual|year=2008|publisher=O'Reilly|location=Beijing|isbn=0-596-51516-2|edition=1st ed.}}</ref> |
||
What does the signature and timestamp do?--[[User:CogPsyProf|CogPsyProf]] ([[User talk:CogPsyProf|talk]]) 17:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
What does the signature and timestamp do?--[[User:CogPsyProf|CogPsyProf]] ([[User talk:CogPsyProf|talk]]) 17:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:53, 10 January 2013
This is a practice page.
Buttons on the top bar of the sandbox include
[edit]Formatting options include bolding and italicizing.
bold
Being bold is important in Wikipedia[1] What does the signature and timestamp do?--CogPsyProf (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Linking options
[edit]One can create links to sources such as imdb entries (e.g., for movie Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind=) and within Wikipedia for another summary of information related to that movie. Rotten Tomatoes website shows that 93% of both critics and audience members liked the film. People interested in cognitive psychologists' summary of research on amnesia might enjoy chpater 11 of Baddeley, Eysenck, and Anderson's book.[2]