User talk:Veggies: Difference between revisions
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==New Section== |
==New Section== |
||
Veggies, please do not be ignorant about what I'm doing on editing the |
Veggies, please do not be ignorant about what I'm doing on editing the Estate Wiki page. I am the web editor of the Estate web page and I was correcting the the errors in our wiki page that a person known to be involved in a legal case with us is making incorrect statements on our wiki page. I am deleting his posts. I suggest you legally allow me to edit out his insertions. Thank you. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/72.81.139.51|72.81.139.51]] ([[User talk:72.81.139.51|talk]]) 05:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:If you have an issue with the accuracy of cited sources, please go to [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]] to resolve the problem instead of [[WP:BLANK|blanking]] entire sections of cited material. -- '''[[User:Veggies|<font color="green" face="Times New Roman">Veggies</font>]]''' ('''''[[User talk:VegitaU|<font color="orange" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC) |
:If you have an issue with the accuracy of cited sources, please go to [[WP:DISPUTE|dispute resolution]] to resolve the problem instead of [[WP:BLANK|blanking]] entire sections of cited material. -- '''[[User:Veggies|<font color="green" face="Times New Roman">Veggies</font>]]''' ('''''[[User talk:VegitaU|<font color="orange" face="Times New Roman">talk</font>]]''''') 05:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
So if a hacker of the Estate decides to post inaccuracies on a case that he is not to comment on about from a case pending in Court in MD on him, you will block the Estate from correcting his errors. Really!!! I think you may want to re-think you actions of blocking us from deleting his posts. I will take this further if you persist. It is up to you. Next time I delete the in-correct mis-information. I cannot comment on an on-going legal case in the courts. Thank you for respecting the legal owners rights and not the perpetrators. Thank you. |
So if a hacker of the Estate decides to post inaccuracies on a case that he is not to comment on about from a case pending in Court in MD on him, you will block the Estate from correcting his errors. Really!!! I think you may want to re-think you actions of blocking us from deleting his posts. I will take this further if you persist. It is up to you. Next time I delete the in-correct mis-information. I cannot comment on an on-going legal case in the courts. Thank you for respecting the legal owners rights and not the perpetrators. Thank you. |
Revision as of 05:25, 17 January 2013
Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on this talk page to all comments left here in order to facilitate an efficient discussion. Please remember to sign your posts! |
Siderian: Genesis to 22 August 2007 |
Commons Account Confirmation
I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is ADuran. Veggies (talk) 20:41, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm YuMaNuMa. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Badrashin train accident, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, YuMaNuMa
Please dont move articles...
without thinking...there are two Hoseynabads in Zarandieh county, not one. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
TUSC token 86e8899560b257d3056483a3474a910b
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Alternate speedy deletion tag
On BestOfChinaTravel.com, I probably would have used A7, though both are valid. What do you think? I do new page patrolling sometimes, and I'm always interested to learn what goes into applying one tag over another. TheBlueCanoe 03:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- That probably would have worked as well. The article just smacked of self-promotion to me. -- Veggies (talk) 03:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
New Section
Veggies, please do not be ignorant about what I'm doing on editing the Estate Wiki page. I am the web editor of the Estate web page and I was correcting the the errors in our wiki page that a person known to be involved in a legal case with us is making incorrect statements on our wiki page. I am deleting his posts. I suggest you legally allow me to edit out his insertions. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.139.51 (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- If you have an issue with the accuracy of cited sources, please go to dispute resolution to resolve the problem instead of blanking entire sections of cited material. -- Veggies (talk) 05:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
So if a hacker of the Estate decides to post inaccuracies on a case that he is not to comment on about from a case pending in Court in MD on him, you will block the Estate from correcting his errors. Really!!! I think you may want to re-think you actions of blocking us from deleting his posts. I will take this further if you persist. It is up to you. Next time I delete the in-correct mis-information. I cannot comment on an on-going legal case in the courts. Thank you for respecting the legal owners rights and not the perpetrators. Thank you.