Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John B. Kimble (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* '''Delete''' - fails [[WP:POLITICIAN]] [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 18:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' - fails [[WP:POLITICIAN]] [[User:Ukexpat|ukexpat]] ([[User talk:Ukexpat|talk]]) 18:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
This article has been on Wikipedia for many times and the individual is a notable individual who has been in newspapers worldwide and has been stated as a "notable person" many times previously. There is no reason to remove an article that gains at least 400 views per thirty day time period. There is no reason to remove the article and because of his "Playgirl" and "New York Times" coverage as well as "The Daily Show" coverage the individual has clearly met notability standards under the Wikipedia guidelines. |
This article has been on Wikipedia for many times and the individual is a notable individual who has been in newspapers worldwide and has been stated as a "notable person" many times previously. There is no reason to remove an article that gains at least 400 views per thirty day time period. There is no reason to remove the article and because of his "Playgirl" and "New York Times" coverage as well as "The Daily Show" coverage the individual has clearly met notability standards under the Wikipedia guidelines. The article is also noteworthy as a"person" and not only as a politician who is a "perpetual candidate". The man is notable and the article has been on Wikipedia since 2007 and not just 2011 as stated above. The article should be kept as informational and notable. |
||
* '''KEEP''' -Meets notability standards |
* '''KEEP''' -Meets notability standards |
||
[[Special:Contributions/68.50.111.217|68.50.111.217]] ([[User talk:68.50.111.217|talk]]) 19:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
[[Special:Contributions/68.50.111.217|68.50.111.217]] ([[User talk:68.50.111.217|talk]]) 19:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
[[Special:Contributions/68.50.111.217|68.50.111.217]] ([[User talk:68.50.111.217|talk]]) |
Revision as of 19:25, 24 January 2013
- John B. Kimble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
With respect, being a candidate for office and holding no other offices makes me think this gentleman doesn't meet the notability guidelines. I see that he has had 2 prior afds (1 delete in 2007, 1 no consensus after a new article was created in 2011), but I don't even think that the 'perpetual also-ran' angle is sufficient in this case (would need to be many more attempts, IMO). Syrthiss (talk) 17:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - fails WP:POLITICIAN ukexpat (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
This article has been on Wikipedia for many times and the individual is a notable individual who has been in newspapers worldwide and has been stated as a "notable person" many times previously. There is no reason to remove an article that gains at least 400 views per thirty day time period. There is no reason to remove the article and because of his "Playgirl" and "New York Times" coverage as well as "The Daily Show" coverage the individual has clearly met notability standards under the Wikipedia guidelines. The article is also noteworthy as a"person" and not only as a politician who is a "perpetual candidate". The man is notable and the article has been on Wikipedia since 2007 and not just 2011 as stated above. The article should be kept as informational and notable.
- KEEP -Meets notability standards
68.50.111.217 (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 68.50.111.217 (talk)