Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal Community Against Violence: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Comment |
Dinkleberger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* '''Delete''' Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:ORG]] [[User:J1nx1337|J1nx1337]] ([[User talk:J1nx1337|talk]]) 23:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' Fails [[WP:GNG]] and [[WP:ORG]] [[User:J1nx1337|J1nx1337]] ([[User talk:J1nx1337|talk]]) 23:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep and clean up''' Meets GNG but needs work as do most articles. [[User:Insomesia|Insomesia]] ([[User talk:Insomesia|talk]]) 21:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Keep and clean up''' Meets GNG but needs work as do most articles. [[User:Insomesia|Insomesia]] ([[User talk:Insomesia|talk]]) 21:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
* '''Delete''' Doesn't pass [[WP:ORG]] [[User:Dinkleberger|Dinkleberger]] ([[User talk:Dinkleberger|talk]]) 02:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:19, 17 February 2013
- Legal Community Against Violence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organization doesn't seem close to being at all notable and all sources are primary sources. GladiusHellfire (talk) 00:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Strong Delete The organization is not notable enough for wikipedia and doesn't receive significant coverage. All sources are primary and article doesn't pass WP:GNG or WP:ORG. IronKnuckle (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per above and per nom JayJayWhat did I do? 02:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Did anyone perform a basic WP:BEFORE search here? Note the copious references at GNews [1] and this recent article [2] that discusses this organization's battle with the National Rifle Association and that that points out that the organization is now called the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence which in turn takes us to hundreds more GNews references[3]? --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:11, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Yep, I found it to be not notable. And the article is using all primary sources. GladiusHellfire (talk) 23:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and speedy close. Another bad faith AFD nomination from a recently arrived SPA with a political agenda. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Hey Wolfowitz, please assume good faith! WP:AOBF How about you give a policy based reason to Keep(if you can find one, I cant.) and less of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. IronKnuckle (talk) 04:49, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:56, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG J1nx1337 (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep and clean up Meets GNG but needs work as do most articles. Insomesia (talk) 21:35, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't pass WP:ORG Dinkleberger (talk) 02:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)