Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Distributor108: Difference between revisions
Eng.Bandara (talk | contribs) |
Eng.Bandara (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
First off, that IP does appear to be mine, however I categorically reject this malicious allegation that that user is me. It is regrettable that this user chose to present evidence from a number of highly spurious and uncorroborated allegation and seek entirely to falsely to implicate members of socket puppetry, the user has chosen to ignore the many positive contribution that I have made, this users behavior would harm the ongoing and comprehensive contributions to develop the sri lanka pages on Wikipedia. It appears the accusing party is very enthusiastic to open a ridiculous amounts of socket puppetry cases [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cossde/Archive]] which Wikipedia alarmingly seems to openly endorse. As the conduct of Wikipedia has fallen well short of the 'standards and fairness' expected of a reputed and responsible organization, I do not wish to be associated with the organization at anytime unless and until a suitable retraction is made to my satisfaction. [[User:Eng.Bandara|Eng.Bandara]] ([[User talk:Eng.Bandara|talk]]) 19:36, 20 February 2013 (UTC) |
First off, that IP does appear to be mine, however I categorically reject this malicious allegation that that user is me. It is regrettable that this user chose to present evidence from a number of highly spurious and uncorroborated allegation and seek entirely to falsely to implicate members of socket puppetry, the user has chosen to ignore the many positive contribution that I have made, this users behavior would harm the ongoing and comprehensive contributions to develop the sri lanka pages on Wikipedia. It appears the accusing party is very enthusiastic to open a ridiculous amounts of socket puppetry cases [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cossde/Archive]] which Wikipedia alarmingly seems to openly endorse. As the conduct of Wikipedia has fallen well short of the 'standards and fairness' expected of a reputed and responsible organization, I do not wish to be associated with the organization at anytime unless and until a suitable retraction is made to my satisfaction. [[User:Eng.Bandara|Eng.Bandara]] ([[User talk:Eng.Bandara|talk]]) 19:36, 20 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
Further it also appears the accusing party is involved in a broad ranging war with Distributor108 [[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/editorinteract.cgi?user1=Distributor108&user2=obi2canibe&user3=&user4=&user5=&user6=&user7=&user8=&user9=&user10=&ns=none&startdate=&enddate=]] across a number of different articles regarding various topics. As the accusing party stated ' '''My suspicions were raised that they were the same person when User:Eng.Bandara started a RfC on Talk:Sri Lanka about amending the Sri Lanka article so that the country's only official language is shown as Sinhala (as opposed to Sinhala and Tamil)'''. ' I started this RfC to gain comments as I found a source to contend what appears to be UN-cited material on the said article. Which I presented with valid concerns and fact. As you can see from obi2canibe own [[Talk:Sri_Lanka/Archive_7#Official_language|link]] the user acting based on the Constitution, I have repeatedly said in my RfC the Constitution is a primary source, and we should focus on the secondary source keeping inline with the OR policy. His claim that the other user cites the factbook as source is ridiculous and its evident from the diff he provided. Regarding the de facto language, it appears the other user and raised the same valid points that I have. It is a very valid logical point, linking 2 and 2 together by two different people is not in anyway an indication that they are same person. [[User:Eng.Bandara|Eng.Bandara]] ([[User talk:Eng.Bandara|talk]]) 19:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
||
Revision as of 19:55, 20 February 2013
Distributor108
- Distributor108 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
20 February 2013
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Eng.Bandara (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
User:Distributor108 was indefinitely blocked on 1 May 2012. User:Eng.Bandara is an account that was created on 18 February 2013. My suspicions were raised that they were the same person when User:Eng.Bandara started a RfC on Talk:Sri Lanka about amending the Sri Lanka article so that the country's only official language is shown as Sinhala (as opposed to Sinhala and Tamil). This was something that User:Distributor108 had tried to do before in September 2011 and April 2012. Both User:Distributor108 and User:Eng.Bandara have tried to use the CIA fact-book to make their point: Distributor108 in April 2012 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013. Both also want Sinhala to be shown as the de-facto language: Distributor108 in September 2011 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
Both users has also edited the same articles:
- Southern Expressway (Sri Lanka) - Distributor108 in August 2011 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
- Ministry of Defence (Sri Lanka) - Distributor108 in August 2011 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
- Alleged war crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War - Distributor108 in September 2011 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
- Sri Lanka Armed Forces - Distributor108 in September 2011 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
Both editors seem to be "keen" on promoting articles to FA: Distributor108 in April 2012 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
And both editors also use the same IP address - 114.76.220.19 (talk · contribs). A previous SPI established relationship between User:Distributor108 and User:114.76.220.19. And now User:Eng.Bandara is editing on the same articles as User:114.76.220.19:
- Newly industrialized country - 114.76.220.19 in February 2013 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
- Talk:Indian Armed Forces - in February 2013 v Eng.Bandara in February 2013.
I have no doubt that User:Distributor108 and User:Eng.Bandara are the same person. And I have no doubt that this individual intends use the User:Eng.Bandara account for purely disruptive purposes as they did with the User:Distributor108 account. obi2canibetalk contr 13:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. First off, that IP does appear to be mine, however I categorically reject this malicious allegation that that user is me. It is regrettable that this user chose to present evidence from a number of highly spurious and uncorroborated allegation and seek entirely to falsely to implicate members of socket puppetry, the user has chosen to ignore the many positive contribution that I have made, this users behavior would harm the ongoing and comprehensive contributions to develop the sri lanka pages on Wikipedia. It appears the accusing party is very enthusiastic to open a ridiculous amounts of socket puppetry cases [[1]] which Wikipedia alarmingly seems to openly endorse. As the conduct of Wikipedia has fallen well short of the 'standards and fairness' expected of a reputed and responsible organization, I do not wish to be associated with the organization at anytime unless and until a suitable retraction is made to my satisfaction. Eng.Bandara (talk) 19:36, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Further it also appears the accusing party is involved in a broad ranging war with Distributor108 [[2]] across a number of different articles regarding various topics. As the accusing party stated ' My suspicions were raised that they were the same person when User:Eng.Bandara started a RfC on Talk:Sri Lanka about amending the Sri Lanka article so that the country's only official language is shown as Sinhala (as opposed to Sinhala and Tamil). ' I started this RfC to gain comments as I found a source to contend what appears to be UN-cited material on the said article. Which I presented with valid concerns and fact. As you can see from obi2canibe own link the user acting based on the Constitution, I have repeatedly said in my RfC the Constitution is a primary source, and we should focus on the secondary source keeping inline with the OR policy. His claim that the other user cites the factbook as source is ridiculous and its evident from the diff he provided. Regarding the de facto language, it appears the other user and raised the same valid points that I have. It is a very valid logical point, linking 2 and 2 together by two different people is not in anyway an indication that they are same person. Eng.Bandara (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)