Talk:The Bomb: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
etc. |
→Should the term "the bomb" have it's own article?: new section |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
can I get "the bomb" to become a separate page (not redirecting)? I have the book and am interested in adding what I feel is the summary. (Will tell an admin.) |
can I get "the bomb" to become a separate page (not redirecting)? I have the book and am interested in adding what I feel is the summary. (Will tell an admin.) |
||
== Should the term "the bomb" have it's own article? == |
|||
I just read a very interesting book about the term "the bomb", referring to a nuclear weapon. I think the term itself warrants an article, considering how often it has been used and for so long now. I'll be looking for some more citable information, but I don't have much experience with the actual creation of articles. [[Special:Contributions/125.253.96.174|125.253.96.174]] ([[User talk:125.253.96.174|talk]]) 13:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:45, 1 March 2013
etc.
can I get "the bomb" to become a separate page (not redirecting)? I have the book and am interested in adding what I feel is the summary. (Will tell an admin.)
Should the term "the bomb" have it's own article?
I just read a very interesting book about the term "the bomb", referring to a nuclear weapon. I think the term itself warrants an article, considering how often it has been used and for so long now. I'll be looking for some more citable information, but I don't have much experience with the actual creation of articles. 125.253.96.174 (talk) 13:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)