Jump to content

Caroline Haythornthwaite: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Marc1070 (talk | contribs)
Marc1070 (talk | contribs)
Line 154: Line 154:
Haythornthwaite’s popular book ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’ has received some criticism from both peers and literary critics. Mary Chayko of the College of Saint Elizabeth stated that the arguments in the book relied too heavily on quantitative research data, the nature of which would result in the contributors findings soon becoming obsolete.<ref>Mary Chakyo, Review of The Internet in Everyday Life, http://groups.chass.utoronto.ca/netlab/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/The-Internet-in-Everyday-Life-Review.pdf</ref> Robert E. Wood supported this in his review of the book as well as seeing a need for more contextual research, stating that “The studies make important statements at this level — based mainly on large-scale surveys and quantitative analyses — but collectively also point toward the need for more fine-grained and context-specific studies”. Wood also describes the “vast generalisations” the contributors make during a number of the books chapters. <ref>Robert E. Wood, "The Internet in Everyday Life (review)", http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/social_forces/v082/82.3wood.pdf</ref>
Haythornthwaite’s popular book ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’ has received some criticism from both peers and literary critics. Mary Chayko of the College of Saint Elizabeth stated that the arguments in the book relied too heavily on quantitative research data, the nature of which would result in the contributors findings soon becoming obsolete.<ref>Mary Chakyo, Review of The Internet in Everyday Life, http://groups.chass.utoronto.ca/netlab/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/The-Internet-in-Everyday-Life-Review.pdf</ref> Robert E. Wood supported this in his review of the book as well as seeing a need for more contextual research, stating that “The studies make important statements at this level — based mainly on large-scale surveys and quantitative analyses — but collectively also point toward the need for more fine-grained and context-specific studies”. Wood also describes the “vast generalisations” the contributors make during a number of the books chapters. <ref>Robert E. Wood, "The Internet in Everyday Life (review)", http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/social_forces/v082/82.3wood.pdf</ref>


Kris Cohen of the [[University of Surrey]] and [[Chicago|University of Chicago]] took this notion a step further during his review of the book, telling of a narrative that has appeared in similar literature and is present in ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’. <ref name="cohen">Kris Cohen, Review of Internet in Everyday Life, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/reviews/cohen.html</ref> This narrative describes how ‘qualitative and quantitative researchers, social scientists and Humanities researchers, continue to work, each in our own worlds, heedless’. <ref name="cohen"></ref>
Kris Cohen of the [[University of Surrey]] and [[University of Chicago|Chicago]] took this notion a step further during his review of the book, telling of a narrative that has appeared in similar literature and is present in ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’. <ref name="cohen">Kris Cohen, Review of Internet in Everyday Life, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/reviews/cohen.html</ref> This narrative describes how ‘qualitative and quantitative researchers, social scientists and Humanities researchers, continue to work, each in our own worlds, heedless’. <ref name="cohen"></ref>


Cohen raises another issue with ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’, criticising the book as being too ‘polemic’.<ref name="cohen"></ref> Cohen states that a ‘study of [Internet] users in Pittsburgh, which suggested that heavy internet use might lead to depression and isolation, received national attention from the media’ by Kraut et al (1998) is a reference to thirteen out of twenty (65%) of essays referenced in the book, and eighteen out of twenty essays (90%) respond explicitly to the moralistic question set forth by Kraut et al, “thereby accepting its terms and conditions”. <ref name="cohen"></ref> Cohen also sees a contradiction in this bias, with Haythornthwaite setting out to address Kraut et al’s moralistic question by 'rejecting the question' itself, whilst the other contributors get trapped in that paper’s moralistic framework .<ref name="cohen"></ref>
Cohen raises another issue with ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’, criticising the book as being too ‘polemic’.<ref name="cohen"></ref> Cohen states that a ‘study of [Internet] users in Pittsburgh, which suggested that heavy internet use might lead to depression and isolation, received national attention from the media’ by Kraut et al (1998) is a reference to thirteen out of twenty (65%) of essays referenced in the book, and eighteen out of twenty essays (90%) respond explicitly to the moralistic question set forth by Kraut et al, “thereby accepting its terms and conditions”. <ref name="cohen"></ref> Cohen also sees a contradiction in this bias, with Haythornthwaite setting out to address Kraut et al’s moralistic question by 'rejecting the question' itself, whilst the other contributors get trapped in that paper’s moralistic framework .<ref name="cohen"></ref>

Revision as of 06:44, 6 March 2013


Caroline Haythornthwaite
Caroline Haythornthwaite receiving an Information Systems/Technologies Award, May 13th 2007.
Caroline Haythornthwaite receiving an Information Systems/Technologies Award, May 13th 2007.
BornDOB unknown
unknown
OccupationDirector, Professor, Researcher
LanguageEnglish
CitizenshipCanadian
Notable workstbc
Spouseunknown

Comment: Virtually all the references, apart from the reviews of her book are by the subject herself. To establish notability, this needs many more references from completely independent sources which are writing specifically about her and her work. Other problems: 1) The article reads like a CV rather than encyclopedia article. 2) Refer to the subject by her surname, not "Caroline". The use of first names is unencyclopedic and contrary to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biographies. 3) Do not use meaningless time contructs like "Currently". Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. 4) The whole section "In the news" is simply a laundry list of external links and is inappropriate in the body of the article, as is its unencyclopedic heading. This is especially true, since the "news" consists of internal university announcements, not articles in the mainstream press or academic journals. Incorporate anything there which is non-trivial into the discussion of her work or career in other sections using discursive prose with the links given in footnotes, i.e. inline citations. Or, move the links en masse to the "External links" section. Voceditenore (talk) 14:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for this feedback! I have promptly made changes to point 2) in your feedback and we will certainly review the remaining points and make any required changes to the article. Cmhardi1 (talk) 21:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Caroline Haythornthwaite is the Director & Professor at the Library, Archival and Information Studies, School of (SLAIS), University of British Columbia. Her research areas explore the way interaction via computer media supports and affects work, learning, and social interaction, primarily from a social network analysis perspective.[1]

Education

In 1975 Haythornthwaite graduated from Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario where she completed a B.Sc degree in Psychology. After completing her B.S.c degree, Haythornthwaite completed a Masters degree in Psychology, graduating a year later in 1976 from the University of Toronto. After a number of years in employment, Haythornthwaite completed an M.I.S. in Information Science at the University of Toronto in 1992, before going on to complete her Ph.D. in Information Science in 1996.[2]

University Associations

Haythornthwaite has been professionally associated with two Universities. After spending 14 years as a faculty member at the UIUC Graduate School of Library and Information Science[3], Haythornthwaite is now listed as a Director and Professor at University of British Columbia School of Library, Archival and Information Studies[4] a position she has held since 2010. Haythornthwaite's term as director is due to expire after 5 years, in August 2015.

Awards & Recognition

During her education and subsequent time in employment, Haythornthwaite has received numerous awards and recognitions. She has also received several scholarships during her University education, including:

  • 1974-5 Trent University Scholarship
  • 1974  J.P. Scott Memorial Scholarship, (Psychology), Trent University
  • 1975-6 National Research Council Scholarship
  • 1992-3, 1993-4, 1995-6 Ontario Graduate Scholarship

She also received fellowships during 1992-3, and 1994-5 whilst at the University of Toronto; and also during 2007-8 from the National Center for Supercomputing Applications Awards which Haythornthwaite has received have included: 1975  Department of Psychology Prize, Trent University

  • 1999 Winner, ALISE Research Paper Competition ($500 cash prize)
  • 1999-2000 Centennial Scholar Award, GSLIS, UIUC ($4500 in research funds)

In 2005 Haythornthwaite received a lifetime membership from the Association of Internet Researchers for contribution to the Association.

Haythornthwaite has also received numerous forms of recognition, including:
PAPERS SELECTED AS BEST IN SESSION OR TRACK

  • 1994 Haythornthwaite, Wellman & Mantei, 1994: 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 1999  Haythornthwaite, 1999: 32nd Hawaii International Conf. on System Sciences
  • 2000  Kanfer, Haythornthwaite, Bowker, Bruce, Burbules, Porac & Wade
  • 2000: Academic- Industry Working Conference on Research Challenges

Authored work

Haythornthwaite has authored and co-authored a variety of publications ranging from books to academic lectures. Despite the majority of her published material deriving from academic collaborations - hence co-authored - Haythornthwaite has authored and published her own work. She is credited with authoring and publishing the following material:[5]

Learning Networks (Leverhulme Trust Public Lectures)

Between December 2009 and May 2010 Haythornthwaite gave a series of public lectures for the Leverhulme Trust at the London Knowledge Lab. These lectures were focused around her primary research areas at the time which was social networks, computer networks, and e-learning.[6] During her stay in the United Kingdom Haythornthwaite gave a total of six lectures listed in further detail below:[7]

  • Learning in the age of web 2.0 (1 December 2009)
  • Learning and scholarly communication in the age of the Internet (4 February 2010)
  • New theories and perspectives on learning in the digital age (23 February 2010)
  • Social networks and learning (11 March 2010)
  • Social informatics (30 March 2010)
  • Ubiquitous learning (10 May 2010)

Academic research areas

Haythornthwaite's research focuses on how the Internet and information and communication technologies (ICTs) support work, learning and social interaction, and is approached primarily from a social network analysis perspective. Her academic areas of research and research interests include the following:[8]

  • E-learning
  • Computer-Mediated Communication
  • Organizational Theory
  • Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL)
  • Educational Informatics
  • Sociology Of Scientific Knowledge
  • Sociology Of Technology (Science And Technology Studies)
  • Group Behavior
  • Peer Production

Current Professional Position

Haythornthwaite is currently working for the University of British Columbia. She began working in the School of Library, Archival and Information Sciences at the Universities iSchool in 2010. Haythornthwaite is a Director and Professor at the University. She also has further roles at the University as she is a member of a number of committees including the UBC Scholarly Communications Steering Committee and the UBC advisory committee for policy review on information systems and assets use and security. Haythornthwaite is interested in how the Internet and Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) can support learning, work and the social interaction between people. This interest can be seen throughout her research which focuses on this area. Her research is conducted through the analysis of Social Networks.[9]


Past Professional Positions

Institute Of Education, University of London Commencing 2009 and finishing in 2010 Haythornthwaite was a Leverhulme Trust visiting professor at the Institute of Education, University of London. The year at the Institute of Education entailed research, writing and public presentations on the topic of Learning Networks. This research encompassed overlapping themes of social networks, computer networks and learning. A result of Haythornthwaite’s time at the Institute of Education was the book E-learning Theory and Practice, co-authored with Institute of Education Professor Richard Andrews.

Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Commencing 1996 and finishing in 2010 Haythornthwaite was employed at the UIUC Graduate School of Library and Information Science (GSLIS), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). In Haythornthwaite’s time at GSLIS UIUC she held a number of academic positions, from 1996 to 2002 Haythornthwaite was Assistant Professor GSLIS, UIUC. 2002 – 2008 Haythornthwaite was Associate Professor GSLIS, UIUC. In 2008 Haythornthwaite was made Professor GSLIS, UIUC and remained in this post until 2010.

Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, and the Ontario Telepresence Project Commencing 1993 and finishing in 1996 Haythornthwaite was a research assistant at the University of Toronto. Haythornthwaite’s work consisted of research and data analysis as well as the righting of research papers. The work resulted in publications and conference presentations.

Freelance Technical Writer Commencing 1991 and finishing in 1992 Haythornthwaite was a freelance technical writer for a development company in Mississauga, Ont.

Real-Time Applications Group Reuters P.L.C., Information Products Technology Group, Toronto, Ont. Commencing 1990 and finishing in 1991 Haythornthwaite was a development manager at Real-Time Applications Group Reuters P.L.C. In this role Haythornthwaite was responsible for the management of a team developing software for delivery of real-time financial data.

Application Development Group, I.P. Sharp Associates (A Reuter Company), Toronto, Ontario Commencing 1981 and finishing in 1989 Haythornthwaite was employed at I.P. Sharp Associates. In her time at I.P.Sharp Haythornthwaite had a number of roles including Programmer Analyst, Senior Systems Analyst and Application Development Manager. In these roles Haythornthwaite worked on a number of different projects for the company.

Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, and Hearing Research Laboratory, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (1977-78; 1979-81); Department of Experimental Psychology, Cambridge University, U.K. (1979); Faculty of Nursing and Faculty of Engineering, University of Toronto (1980, 1981) Commencing 1977 and finishing in 1981 Haythornthwaite designed experimental procedures, collected and analyzed data, supervised assistants, assisted in design of computer systems, and wrote programs to manage data and analysis.

Co-Authored Work

Haythornthwaite has written many journals, articles and has co-authored five books to date. These books again focus on the Internet, E-learning and the culture and communities in online education.

E-learning Theory and Practice

Written by both Haythornthwaite and Richard Andrew E-learning Theory and Practice came out in 2011. This book discusses different perspectives on E-learning. This book aims to help those involved in E-learning to gain an understanding of new learning practices and for the learners themselves to gain an understanding of their role as active participants in both the classroom and lifelong learning. [10]

Handbook of E-Learning Research

Haythornthwaite worked alongside Richard Andrews previously to produce Handbook of E-learning Research in 2006. This book provides the reader with reviews of E-learning research. This book contains the basics of E-learning as well as new perspectives in the area.[11]

AoIR Internet Annual, Volume 4

In 2006 Haythornthwaite worked alongside Mia Consalvo to produce AoIR Internet Annual, Volume 4. This book is a collection of highlights from a number of scholars who made contributions at the 2005 Association of Internet Researchers conference or AoIR conference.[12]

Learning, Culture and Community in Online Education: Research and Practice

In 1996 the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign began the LEEP program. This allowed learners from across the US and the world, to take part in an internet based learning program which enabled them to earn a Master's degree. The aim of this book was to bring together new research concerning online education and used the LEEP program as a model to show the benefits of online education, and was written by Haythornthwaite and Michelle. M. Kazmer[13]

The Internet in Everyday Life

Written by Haythornthwaite and Barry Wellman, the Internet in Everyday Life concentrated on 19 studies. These studies were used to discuss the domestication of the Internet in day-to-day life and also brought about the idea of new questions and methodologies that may need to be asked in the future of Internet Studies.[14]

Criticisms of Haythornthwaite's Work

The Internet in Everyday Life

Haythornthwaite’s popular book ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’ has received some criticism from both peers and literary critics. Mary Chayko of the College of Saint Elizabeth stated that the arguments in the book relied too heavily on quantitative research data, the nature of which would result in the contributors findings soon becoming obsolete.[15] Robert E. Wood supported this in his review of the book as well as seeing a need for more contextual research, stating that “The studies make important statements at this level — based mainly on large-scale surveys and quantitative analyses — but collectively also point toward the need for more fine-grained and context-specific studies”. Wood also describes the “vast generalisations” the contributors make during a number of the books chapters. [16]

Kris Cohen of the University of Surrey and Chicago took this notion a step further during his review of the book, telling of a narrative that has appeared in similar literature and is present in ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’. [17] This narrative describes how ‘qualitative and quantitative researchers, social scientists and Humanities researchers, continue to work, each in our own worlds, heedless’. [17]

Cohen raises another issue with ‘The Internet in Everyday Life’, criticising the book as being too ‘polemic’.[17] Cohen states that a ‘study of [Internet] users in Pittsburgh, which suggested that heavy internet use might lead to depression and isolation, received national attention from the media’ by Kraut et al (1998) is a reference to thirteen out of twenty (65%) of essays referenced in the book, and eighteen out of twenty essays (90%) respond explicitly to the moralistic question set forth by Kraut et al, “thereby accepting its terms and conditions”. [17] Cohen also sees a contradiction in this bias, with Haythornthwaite setting out to address Kraut et al’s moralistic question by 'rejecting the question' itself, whilst the other contributors get trapped in that paper’s moralistic framework .[17]

Learning Culture and Community in Online Education: Research and Practice

In her mainly positive review of Haythornthwaites paper ‘Learning, Culture and Community in Online Education: Research and Practice’, Nora Wright of the University of California found one problem with the paper, in that it appears less approachable to students and researchers than the content would suggest. Wright states that ‘Learning, Culture and Community in Online Education’ is not for “library information science people only, although it may seem to be at first glance”.[18]

Public Appearances

References

  1. ^ Haythornthwaite, Caroline. "Work, Learning, and Social Interaction". Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  2. ^ Haythornthwaite, Caroline. "Educational Background" (PDF). Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  3. ^ Haythornthwaite, Caroline. "Faculty Member - Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois". Retrieved 28 February 2013.
  4. ^ Haythornthwaite, Caroline. "Director & Professor - iSchool at the University of British Columbia". Retrieved 28 February 2013.
  5. ^ "IDEALS (Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship)". Retrieved 6 March 2013.
  6. ^ "Learning Networks (Leverhulme Trust Public Lectures)". Retrieved 28 February 2013.
  7. ^ "Institute of Education (University of London)". Retrieved 28 February 2013.
  8. ^ "Academia (University of Illinois)". Retrieved 27 February 2013.
  9. ^ Haythornthwaite, Caroline. "Current Professional Position" (PDF). Retrieved 26 February 2013.
  10. ^ Haythornthwaite, Caroline. "E-learning Theory and Practice". Retrieved 26 February 2013.
  11. ^ "Handbook of E-Learning Research". Retrieved 28 February 2013.
  12. ^ "AoIR Internet Annual, Volume 4". Retrieved 26 February 2013.
  13. ^ "Learning, Culture and Community in Online Education: Research and Practice". Retrieved 26 February 2013.
  14. ^ Wood, Robert E. "The Internet in Everyday Life". Retrieved 26 February 2013.
  15. ^ Mary Chakyo, Review of The Internet in Everyday Life, http://groups.chass.utoronto.ca/netlab/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/The-Internet-in-Everyday-Life-Review.pdf
  16. ^ Robert E. Wood, "The Internet in Everyday Life (review)", http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&type=summary&url=/journals/social_forces/v082/82.3wood.pdf
  17. ^ a b c d e Kris Cohen, Review of Internet in Everyday Life, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/1/reviews/cohen.html
  18. ^ Nora Wright, "A Review of Learning, Culture and Community in Online Education: Research and Practice", http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/10.1/binder.html?reviews/wright/index.html
  • I think we need to add some links here. Maybe move the 'in the news' section here?

Request review at WP:AFC