Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Index of physics articles (!$@): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:53, 8 March 2013

Index of physics articles (!$@)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This an all other similar articles provide nothing that Category:Physics does not while introducing another place to maintain what is essentially categorical information. WIki categories are a better solution here as they are hierarchal instead of flat like these articles. RadioFan (talk) 18:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because reasons listed above:[reply]

Category:Index of physics articles

Delete this, and all indexes in Category:Index of physics articles. Ridiculous and un-maintainable lists which were super-ceded by categories long long ago. —gorgan_almighty (talk) 18:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can see the merit of keeping these. Which is, it's good and useful to have a flat index as well as a nested-Lord-knows-how-many-deep hierarchy. Let's not declare it un-maintainable unless we've shown that nobody is maintaining them. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 18:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 18:46, 8 March 2013 edit MadeYourReadThis (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 97,132 edits adding category ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:53, 8 March 2013 edit undo Collard (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 3,142 edits →‎Index of physics articles (!$@): keepish Next edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:

	* '''Delete this, and all indexes in [[:Category:Index of physics articles]]'''. Ridiculous and un-maintainable lists which were super-ceded by categories long long ago. —[[User:Gorgan almighty\|gorgan_almighty]] ([[User talk:Gorgan almighty\|talk]]) 18:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)		* '''Delete this, and all indexes in [[:Category:Index of physics articles]]'''. Ridiculous and un-maintainable lists which were super-ceded by categories long long ago. —[[User:Gorgan almighty\|gorgan_almighty]] ([[User talk:Gorgan almighty\|talk]]) 18:37, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
			* I can see the merit of '''keep'''ing these. Which is, it's good and useful to have a flat index ''as well'' as a nested-Lord-knows-how-many-deep hierarchy. Let's not declare it un-maintainable unless we've shown that nobody is maintaining them. [[User:Collard\|Lewis Collard!]] <small>([[User talk:Collard\|lol]], [[commons:User:Collard\|internet]]) </small> 18:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)