Talk:Charis Alliance: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:32, 24 March 2013

Christianity: Anabaptist Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Anabaptist work group (assessed as High-importance).

I'm wondering if there is any evidence for the stuff about the FGBC "muting" its motto and taking a new motto, as well as taking Bono as a "valuable source of instruction." I kind of doubt that this is an official stance, due to the autonomous nature of the churches in the Fellowship and the specificity of the analysis. Cnodell123 08:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I'm not sure that I inserted the link correctly when I inserted the request for verification on the actual article. If anyone wants to fix that/correct me, please do. Cnodell123 09:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To explain why I removed references to Calvinism in this article, I sent an email to Eric Bradley as follows:

Hi Mr. Bradley,

I minored in religion/theology at Grove City College and therefore have some theological training in my background. I was reviewing this article, and the references to Calvinism struck me as odd. None of these movements were at all "Calvinistic" if we use that term properly to describe movements that spring from Calvinism. Rather, all of the Brethren sects originate from Arminianism in the anabaptist/pietist tradition.

If I had to guess, the editor who added these references was trying to convey a minor distinction between sub-sects relative to the manner in which they seek to proselytize, i.e., the more "Calvinistic" a sect is, the less it seeks to actively proselytize.

Regardless of the editor's intent, I think it is an inappropriate use of the term. Do you agree? I don't want to jump in and do an edit unless I know I have some sort of consensus from one or two of the page's primary contributors.