Jump to content

Talk:Hybrid warfare: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 5: Line 5:
:: I will try and find a ref that notes the difference. [[User:Hcobb|Hcobb]] ([[User talk:Hcobb|talk]]) 19:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
:: I will try and find a ref that notes the difference. [[User:Hcobb|Hcobb]] ([[User talk:Hcobb|talk]]) 19:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
::HW is not a USAF owned idiom. Many militaries and people use it. [[User:Zabanio|Zabanio]] ([[User talk:Zabanio|talk]]) 21:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
::HW is not a USAF owned idiom. Many militaries and people use it. [[User:Zabanio|Zabanio]] ([[User talk:Zabanio|talk]]) 21:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

== Hybrid Warfare ==
HW may not appear in any Joint Publications, but it IS in Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-0, Unified Land Operations, 10 October 2011. Page 4, "The most likely security threats that Army forces will encounter are best described as hybrid threats. A hybrid threat is the diverse and dynamic combination of regular forces, irregular forces, terrorist forces, criminal elements, or a combination of these forces and elements all unified to achieve mutually benefitting effects. Hybrid threats may involve nation-state adversaries that employ protracted forms of warfare, possibly using proxy forces to coerce and intimidate, or nonstate actors using operational concepts and high-end capabilities traditionally associated with nation-states."

Also, for the Army, the term "battlespace" has been rescinded, but is still in use by the USMC. The correct Army term now is "operational environment." The reference for this is the Army Terminologist, Carlos L. Soto, and the site is https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/armymarine-corps-terminology?view=overview

Revision as of 17:10, 25 March 2013

Three Block War

The Three Block War is the reverse of this concept. Both terms handle complex mixed situations, but TBW is a USMC focus on bottom up while HW is USAF style top down warfare. Hcobb (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to remove it go ahead -:) Zabanio (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I will try and find a ref that notes the difference. Hcobb (talk) 19:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
HW is not a USAF owned idiom. Many militaries and people use it. Zabanio (talk) 21:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid Warfare

HW may not appear in any Joint Publications, but it IS in Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-0, Unified Land Operations, 10 October 2011. Page 4, "The most likely security threats that Army forces will encounter are best described as hybrid threats. A hybrid threat is the diverse and dynamic combination of regular forces, irregular forces, terrorist forces, criminal elements, or a combination of these forces and elements all unified to achieve mutually benefitting effects. Hybrid threats may involve nation-state adversaries that employ protracted forms of warfare, possibly using proxy forces to coerce and intimidate, or nonstate actors using operational concepts and high-end capabilities traditionally associated with nation-states."

Also, for the Army, the term "battlespace" has been rescinded, but is still in use by the USMC. The correct Army term now is "operational environment." The reference for this is the Army Terminologist, Carlos L. Soto, and the site is https://www.milsuite.mil/book/groups/armymarine-corps-terminology?view=overview