User talk:Hcobb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, Hcobb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Bzuk (talk) 15:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

On Feb 13, 2011 you added this to Canard (aeronautics): "A canard design is inherently less controllable than a tailplane design because the ailerons can not be located on the canards (the lever arm is too short and the twisting motion is too far forwards of the center of mass) and ailerons located on the main wing are subject to turbulence from the canards that varies widely at different Angle of attack". Anderson, Seth B. "the twisting motion is too far forwards of the center of mass", doesn't sound right, sourced or not. I haven't found the phrase in the reference doc yet. Could we trim that statement out? --Stodieck (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Made an exact quote with page number. Hcobb (talk) 22:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Ah. I have been looking at the wrong doc. A result of the lines recent relocation on this page. I don't have access to the Clancy book. Still sounds fishy. Will keep looking. --Stodieck (talk) 00:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Fixed link to NASA tech doc with exact quote. Hcobb (talk) 01:06, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Bingo! Thanks. --Stodieck (talk) 03:14, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Hcobb. You have new messages at Talk:Duncan D. Hunter.
Message added 17:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your interest in F-35 article

Would you please leave a remark at the Wikipedia Talk page for the F-35 article indicating your concurrence with my attempts to leave sourced, factual information under the Training section (about 3/4 into the article)? I want to document the latest grounding but my remarks keep getting vandalized.BLZebubba (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:19, 2 July 2014 (UTC)