Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slidehard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Daniel Case (talk | contribs) →Slidehard: delete |
→Slidehard: '''Comment''' … The author of this article has been indef blocked from editing because of their username. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom … the single "reference" is a [[WP:SPAMLINK]] to a book for sale at the author's website. Happy Editing! — '''{{User|108.48.215.54}}''' <sub>16:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</sub> |
*'''Delete''' per nom … the single "reference" is a [[WP:SPAMLINK]] to a book for sale at the author's website. Happy Editing! — '''{{User|108.48.215.54}}''' <sub>16:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</sub> |
||
*'''Delete''', didn't know that a show canceled years ago had enough fans still around for them to have an actual name. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', didn't know that a show canceled years ago had enough fans still around for them to have an actual name. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 19:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
**'''Comment''' … FYI, the author of this article has been indef [[WP:BLOCK|blocked]] from editing because of their username. — [[Special:Contributions/108.48.215.54|108.48.215.54]] ([[User talk:108.48.215.54|talk]]) 00:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Language|list of Language-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Language|list of Language-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</small> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction|list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 17:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)</small> |
||
Revision as of 00:21, 4 April 2013
- Slidehard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of widespread use or notability of this term. The one reference does not seem to be a significant source, and is probably not reliable. (A PROD was removed by the creator of the article, with no explanation.) JamesBWatson (talk) 11:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom statement. This content would be more appropriate for the Urban Dictionary. - MrX 12:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Alexf(talk) 13:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:02, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom … the single "reference" is a WP:SPAMLINK to a book for sale at the author's website. Happy Editing! — 108.48.215.54 (talk · contribs) 16:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, didn't know that a show canceled years ago had enough fans still around for them to have an actual name. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment … FYI, the author of this article has been indef blocked from editing because of their username. — 108.48.215.54 (talk) 00:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)