Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 10:04, 6 April 2013

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Fishes and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Shortcut

WT:FISH

Archives

Archive 1 – until July 2007
Archive 2 – until July 2009
/Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Is seafood a subset of cuisine?

Should articles on seafood be given titles that restrict them to cuisines, as a user maintains in this thread? There is a referral for comment on this issue where members of this project are invited to give their views. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorn shark

Can someone verify this species, I saw it when looking through recent changes and it smells a bit... fishy. Rgrds. --64.85.221.220 (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a hoax. I've marked it for deletion. -- Yzx (talk) 18:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help Identifying catfish

I think this is a basa catfish but I'm not sure. Fish was found in India. Can some one good at this stuff ID i so that I can put it up on the article?

Thanks.Staticd (talk) 06:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category: articles needing expert attention...fish or fishes?

There's a link at Category:Fishes articles needing attention that goes to Category:Fish articles needing expert attention which is empty. There is, however, a non-empty Category:Fishes articles needing expert attention. Seems wrong, Richigi (talk) 21:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Devil's Image

There is an image of Sea devil (according to its official description, Ceratiidae) which seems so strange to me. On its official description page it says, 'A mummified specimen of this exotic fish was presented by Dr. Muhammad Farhad Rahimi to the museum of Astane Qudse Razavi in 1999.' and in the museum the description card says Dr. Muhammad Farhad Rahimi bought the taxidermied animal from France in 1970. I put the image on the article. Are there any comments from experts?--Taranet (talk) 05:06, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to do with Ceratiidae, and I've removed your addition of the image to that article. Looks like someone has been having some creative time with a skate skeleton. I have also added an explanatory note to the description of the image on Commons, and categorised it under "Humour in art". --Epipelagic (talk) 06:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I changed the category to 'fake objects'--Taranet (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Jenny Haniver --Dbr de (talk) 10:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Poeciliopsis occidentalis sonorensis

According to Fishbase valid as Poeciliopsis sonoriensis. The article has been updated, but it needs to be moved to the appropriate lemma. Regards, --Dbr de (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 * Nothing to do with ''[[Ceratiidae]]'', and I've removed your addition of the image to that article. Looks like someone has been having some creative time with a [[skate]] skeleton. I have also added an explanatory note to the description of the image on Commons, and categorised it under "Humour in art". --[[User:Epipelagic|Epipelagic]] ([[User talk:Epipelagic|talk]]) 06:12, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
 ::Thanks. I changed the category to 'fake objects'--[[User:Taranet|Taranet]] ([[User talk:Taranet|talk]]) 18:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
+::: See also: [[Jenny Haniver]] --[[User:Dbr de|Dbr de]] ([[User talk:Dbr de|talk]]) 10:04, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 == ''[[Poeciliopsis occidentalis sonorensis]]'' ==