Jump to content

Talk:Cinema of Kosovo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Evlekis (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
*''Đakovica in Kosovo''. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22%C4%90akovica+in+Kosovo%22&oq=%22%C4%90akovica+in+Kosovo%22&gs_l=serp.3...152635.156251.0.156768.10.8.0.0.0.2.589.1476.0j1j3j5-1.5.0...0.0...1c.1.9.serp._L_aC5g5mlo 37,000+ results]<br>
*''Đakovica in Kosovo''. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22%C4%90akovica+in+Kosovo%22&oq=%22%C4%90akovica+in+Kosovo%22&gs_l=serp.3...152635.156251.0.156768.10.8.0.0.0.2.589.1476.0j1j3j5-1.5.0...0.0...1c.1.9.serp._L_aC5g5mlo 37,000+ results]<br>
[[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] ('''Евлекис''') ([[User talk:Evlekis|argue]]) 19:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
[[User:Evlekis|Evlekis]] ('''Евлекис''') ([[User talk:Evlekis|argue]]) 19:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

It’s not how many results does each name has but its about which is official. I have not seen Uroševac, Đakovica, and Peć being used in English. Since this article is in English and Kosovo is a multiethnic country where 93% of the population is Albanian there is no reason names to be written in serbian.
AS [[Special:Contributions/82.114.77.19|82.114.77.19]] ([[User talk:82.114.77.19|talk]]) 19:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:58, 19 April 2013

WikiProject iconKosovo Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconCinema of Kosovo is part of WikiProject Kosovo, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Kosovo on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFilm Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

There is a lot of external links throughout the article and in the extenal links section towards the end. That needs to be cleaned up. KTC (public) (talk) 16:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus

The original author of the article has requested that consensus be reached on certain aspects of the article regarding my edits. This space can be to resolve any issues. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 17:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Names of the cities

I think the names of the cities should be like : Pristina, Mitrovicë, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Prizren, Gjakovë, and Pejë because this is how they are called in English too. Here are the links of some foreign websites that mentioned these cities : http://www.europan-europe.eu/en/session/europan-12/site/gjilan ,http://www.collinsmaps.com/maps/Kosovo/Mitrovice/P410633.00.aspx (Kosovska Mitrovica as an alternative name), http://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/Tourism-g3581761-Gjakove-Vacations.html, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/448273/Peje . Using Pristina, Kosovska Mitrovica, Gnjilane, Uroševac, Prizren, Đakovica, and Peć is confusing and unilateral. Venus fzy (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


That's a good point. I think that using Pristina, Mitrovicë, Gjilan, Ferizaj, Prizren, Gjakovë, and Pejë it's more appropriate. Bliss 1.618 (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Two things. First, historical accuracy is the policy. If we are writing about a town that was known as Ferizovik (Turkish) for a time pertaining to the Ottoman Empire, then that is what we use. This is because secondly, English follows local usage - and English remains consistent with most of the Serbian names because they came to light during the 1998-99 Kosovo war when the region was within FRY.

Regardless, if it is modern usage that concerns editors, then the practice is to follow WP:AT. So, in Serbian we have Priština, and in Albanian, Pristhina. The article title is neither, it is Pristina. So you need to follow the article title, if it is Ferizaj, then fine. If it is Gnjilane, again fine. It's that simple. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 18:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If I can make the other two users aware of one thing. You will not achieve "consensus" here for this particular venture. We are governed by existing policy. If you believe Gjilan trumps Gnjilane on modern usage then you need to propose a page move and await replies. Otherwise we are inserting information not known to the English speaker. This is not the article to launch such a radical amendment. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 18:28, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A note on names

Why I am doing this I don't know considering this has been discussed many times. Here is a Google update ensuring we get English results.

Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not how many results does each name has but its about which is official. I have not seen Uroševac, Đakovica, and Peć being used in English. Since this article is in English and Kosovo is a multiethnic country where 93% of the population is Albanian there is no reason names to be written in serbian.

                                                   AS    82.114.77.19 (talk) 19:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]