Jump to content

Talk:Parallelogram law: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 13: Line 13:


Certainly the omission that the the converse statement that a norm coming from an inner product satisfies the parallelogram law hold needs to be addressed, in my opinion.
Certainly the omission that the the converse statement that a norm coming from an inner product satisfies the parallelogram law hold needs to be addressed, in my opinion.
[[Special:Contributions/143.210.42.231|143.210.42.231]] ([[User talk:143.210.42.231|talk]]) 09:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


== equivalence of p.-law and general quadrilateral being a parallologram ==
== equivalence of p.-law and general quadrilateral being a parallologram ==

Revision as of 09:51, 15 May 2013

WikiProject iconMathematics B‑class Mid‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Normed vector spaces

For normed vector spaces whose norm obeys the parallelogram law, the operation

is an inner product only for a real vector space, i.e. a vector space over some scalar field that is contained within the reals. For the general case of complex vector spaces we need to define

where is some nonzero pure imaginary element of the scalar field, but not necessarily (in order to take into account fields such as that do not contain )

This isn't a problem when talking about complete spaces, and by the way something about the relationship between Hilbert spaces and Banach spaces could at least be mentioned in passing here as well.

130.94.162.64 23:02, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly the omission that the the converse statement that a norm coming from an inner product satisfies the parallelogram law hold needs to be addressed, in my opinion. 143.210.42.231 (talk) 09:51, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

equivalence of p.-law and general quadrilateral being a parallologram

From the formula for the general quadrilateral it follows easily that a general quadrilateral is a parallelogramm if x=0. This and the formula itself are easy enough to proof, but I cannot find a quotable source for either statement. Anybody else got one?--CWitte (talk) 15:56, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]