User talk:Cambalachero: Difference between revisions
Cambalachero (talk | contribs) |
MarshalN20 (talk | contribs) →Pisco Sour & Arbcomm comments: new section |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
For the Arbitration Committee, — [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''ΛΧΣ'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''<sup>21</sup>'''</font>]] 03:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
For the Arbitration Committee, — [[User:Hahc21|<font color="#333333">'''ΛΧΣ'''</font>]][[User_talk:Hahc21|<font color="#336699">'''<sup>21</sup>'''</font>]] 03:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Pisco Sour & Arbcomm comments == |
|||
Dear Cambalachero, |
|||
<br> |
|||
The uncomfortable situation with ArbComm aside, I was wondering if you could please vote either "oppose" or "support" at the Pisco Sour FAC. I know this sounds a tad blunt, but [[User:Ian Rose]] asked me to send you a comment about it. |
|||
<br> |
|||
Regarding the ArbComm case, we have done so much to contribute to a variety of topics in Wikipedia that some of the ArbComm votes are quite surprising to me (particularly Tim's and Roger's). The other party has only focused on over-glorifying the Brazilian monarchy, and yet that somehow makes him an expert on Latin American history (despite that is the characteristic of a [[WP:SPA]]). |
|||
<br> |
|||
Alas, all humans make mistakes. I hope that those who in this time prefer to vindicate [[Hispanophobia|the windmill opposite to Don Quixote]] will eventually see their error and correct it for the benefit of the encyclopedia. |
|||
<br> |
|||
Best wishes.--[[User:MarshalN20|<span style="color:maroon">'''MarshalN20'''</span>]] | [[User_talk:MarshalN20|<sup><font color="Olive">'''T'''</font><font color="Silver">'''al'''</font><font color="Olive">'''k'''</font></sup>]] 17:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:16, 14 June 2013
FYI, if you have the time. NW (Talk) 03:24, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Done, I had confused the terms "libel" and "libelle" (a pamphlet written against a public figure). By the way, if someone tries to tell you that such a text was a reliable, impartial and trustworthy report, read the subtitle again: "It is a holy action to kill Rosas". Do reliable sources get names like that? I don't think so. Cambalachero (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Argentine History: Proposed decision posted
Hello Cambalachero. I am sending you this message to let you know that the proposed decision of the Argentine History arbitration case in which you are a party, has been posted and is now being discussed by the Arbitration Committee.
For the Arbitration Committee, — ΛΧΣ21 03:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Pisco Sour & Arbcomm comments
Dear Cambalachero,
The uncomfortable situation with ArbComm aside, I was wondering if you could please vote either "oppose" or "support" at the Pisco Sour FAC. I know this sounds a tad blunt, but User:Ian Rose asked me to send you a comment about it.
Regarding the ArbComm case, we have done so much to contribute to a variety of topics in Wikipedia that some of the ArbComm votes are quite surprising to me (particularly Tim's and Roger's). The other party has only focused on over-glorifying the Brazilian monarchy, and yet that somehow makes him an expert on Latin American history (despite that is the characteristic of a WP:SPA).
Alas, all humans make mistakes. I hope that those who in this time prefer to vindicate the windmill opposite to Don Quixote will eventually see their error and correct it for the benefit of the encyclopedia.
Best wishes.--MarshalN20 | Talk 17:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)