User talk:Cambalachero/Archive 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Cambalachero. You have new messages at Talk:Dnestr radar.
Message added 16:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Secretlondon (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Cambalachero. You have new messages at Sainsf's talk page.
Message added Sainsf <^>Talk all words 12:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

May Revolution FAC

I apologize for the late reply. I'm currently putting all of my focus on college, so I may not reply as readily as I would like. In any event, I would be glad to take a glimpse at the article. Since it is so long, the review may take a little while to complete. I'll set the review up in stages. I will start the review no later than Saturday. Cheers! :) —DAP388 (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for 2012 cacerolazo in Argentina

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Graduados, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Blood tables

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Andrea Pietra

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Andrea Pietra. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrea Pietra

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Andrea Pietra has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2012 cacerolazo in Argentina

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.

A tag has been placed on 2012 cacerolazo in Argentina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, Speedy delete contest button.svg. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mapep (talk) 00:25, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Paola Barrientos

Please see my comments at Template:Did you know nominations/Paola Barrientos and explain why my concerns aren't justified. Nyttend (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your formatting help at WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech, much appreciated! — Cirt (talk) 16:39, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps you would like to join, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speech/Participants ? :) — Cirt (talk) 17:08, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Medios en Argentina

Conozco bien la política de neutralidad de Wikipedia: no es mantenerse en el centro sino explicitar todos los puntos de vista posibles. Esta política es violada por ese artículo al solo presentar los puntos de vistas de la Nación (diario de derecha) y Clarín, que hace años mantiene una relación más que conflictiva con el gobierno. No hay citas a Página/12 o Tiempo Argentino, por ejemplo. Además, como Wikipedia no es una fuente primaria: sus artículos son tan válidos como lo son sus citas. Las referencias a Clarín y la Nación no dicen nada de ninguna investigación científica acerca de los medios en Argentina, así que no pueden ser tomados como una verdad, sino como una opinión. En una enciclopedia, las opiniones no deberían camuflarse como verdades universales o científicas. Dicho esto, procedo a revertirte. --190.18.31.143 (talk) 03:27, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Página 12 y Tiempo Argentino no pueden ser usados en temas políticos porque son financiados por el gobierno, y por lo tanto sus opiniones políticas tienen un conflicto de interés. Clarín y La Nación se financian a sí mismos y no están afiliados a ningún partido, por lo que no tienen conflictos de interés. Lo de que el gobierno maneja el 80% de los medios tiene hasta referencias internacionales: ¿hay alguna que lo niegue, y que no esté financiada por el gobierno argentino? Y respecto a la derecha... el muro de Berlín ya se cayó, hace más de 20 años. Cambalachero (talk) 03:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Computing#Portions_of_videos

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Cambalachero. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Computing#Portions_of_videos.
You can remove this notice at any time.

A barnstar for you!

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
Great work on history articles! Neo139 (talk) 01:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, if you need help with some related article, ask me. Cambalachero (talk) 13:30, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

8N (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Sidney
Domingo Matheu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Juan Larrea

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Paola Barrientos

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Cisplatine War

The Peruvian poster is trying to give a unilateral and biased view of the conflict : throughout the conflict Montevideo and Colonia remained under Brazilian control; Brazil wiped out the United Provinces Navy. And the blockade was quite effective, in front of Buenos Aires. If the Brazilian performance had been so bad, Uruguay would have become part of the United Provinces, which it did not.

Given that the outcome was a draw, the portrayal of the conflict you wanted to give is biased, unless you post other opinions (and there are many) contrary to that of Stowell. It is he who should justify that comment he wants so much to post.

Here is what Sir Richard Gordon said to Lord Ponsonby at that time: "Los recursos de este Imperio parecen inmnensos y creyendo como yo que Brown -grande como es- no puede con sus goletas aniquilar a la armada brasileña, simplemente tendrá Ud. al bloqueo restablecido con mayor vigor".187.36.81.70 (talk) 02:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

  • I can post other opinions, the thing is he chose a biased opinion and he is giving a biased view of the conflict. If it were entirely true, Uruguay would have become part of Argentina, which it did not.187.36.81.70 (talk) 02:30, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
  • I can post other opinions as I said. The facts of the conflict speak for themselves anyway. Had it been a military victory, Argentina would have annexed Uruguay, which it did not. And it did not because it was suffering the economic consequences of the naval blockade Brazil imposed on Buenos Aires, its main place of interaction with the outside world, and Argentina at that time was heavily dependent on both exporting and importing goods. Brazil did manage to destroy the functionality of the United Provinces Navy, a fact which that opinion he posted is clearly omitting.187.36.81.70 (talk) 02:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
  • I did not claim Brazil won. The aspects I highlighted were countering the claim that it was a United Provinces military victory, trying to show how unilateral and incomplete is the quote the Peruvian likes so much, even though it does not come from a military historian nor from an expert on the subject.

The United Provinces fought well along with those of the Banda Oriental, and they won many battles, no doubt with valour. Brazil did not manage to win over them. However, in spite of the many military successes of the United Provinces, they still lacked the means to expel the Brazilian troops still stationed in Uruguay and to end the blockade. As for Britain, their interest was in preventing either the United Provinces or Brazil coming clearly victorious since it could pave the way to a major big state in South America, which is all the major powers have tried to avoid, be it Argentina or Brazil. Cheers.187.36.81.70 (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

  • As for Brazil not winning, Brazil was and still is a fragile country. Relocating troops at that time was quite burdensome, our troops were poorly trained, etc. You only need to look at the difficulty we had in coping with the various internal revolutions inside the country at that time, from north to south (the Farroupilha revolution you mentioned being a clear example of it). Besides Uruguay was home to a significant Spanish speaking population, most of the population if I am not wrong, and they were in a strong mood against the Portuguese speaking population, after all Uruguay had been a battleground between Spain and Portugal during colonial times (just look at how many times Colonia changed from Portuguese to Spanish and vice versa), animosities were particulary strong. Just before our independence, Portugal had annexed the Banda Oriental.

The United Provinces, as I said, fought well, invading the Brazilian territory and repelling our troops (battle of Ituzaingó, f.e, and the incursions of Rivera in the territory of Missões). They had already fought well against the British, when the British tried to take over Buenos Aires and were defeated. Brazil did not manage to expel them from the Banda Oriental. There came in the independence of Uruguay.187.36.81.70 (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Chang Kim Sung

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro Conde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cancha Rayada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Luis D'Elía

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Luis D'Elía at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:23, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Bump. It's been a week, and no edits have been made to the article, and no response made on the nomination page. The issues with the article need to be addressed. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
I realize you've just put your "busy" banner at the top of this page, but as there has not been any response from you to these requests, I wanted to let you know the nomination will not be held until your return, but will be closing shortly. I'm sorry you didn't make time to pursue this. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:16, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Book citation

Hello--You have added the following citation to several articles (Manuel Belgrano, for example): {{Cite book |title= Mariano Moreno |last= Scenna |first= Miguel Ángel |authorlink= Miguel Ángel Scenna |year= 2009 |publisher=H. Garetto Editor |location= Buenos Aires |language= Spanish |isbn= 978-987-1494-05-4}}

Because the ISBN you supplied is mathematically incorrect, I have been trying to find a correct ISBN. Unfortunately I have been unable to confirm that this book even exists. Do you own or have access to this book? Can you confirm that the ISBN 978-987-1494-05-4 Parameter error in {{isbn}}: Invalid ISBN. appears on the book? Is the ISBN on the cover of the book the same as the ISBN on the copyright page? Any help you can provide in clearing this up would be appreciated. I will be watching here, so please reply here.--ShelfSkewed Talk 17:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

See a scan of the first page at http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/17/sinttulo1cxf.jpg/ Cambalachero (talk) 18:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. That's exactly what I needed to know. Cheers!--ShelfSkewed Talk 20:23, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I just wanted to add that I have enclosed all the instances of this ISBN in the template {{Listed Invalid ISBN}}. This preserves the search link and allows the number to remain unmarked by bots looking for incorrect ISBNs.--ShelfSkewed Talk 05:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Peacedove.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Juan Manuel de Rosas".

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:
  • It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
  • It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
  • It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
  • It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
  • It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
  • Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
  • Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
  • Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
  • If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.

Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 12:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution noticeboard

Keep an eye on this. --Lecen (talk) 12:43, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Rename discussion

You might want to jump in here after your wikibreak.--Neo139 (talk) 04:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Your help is needed

Hi. I'm a volunteer at WP:Third opinion. Could you please see Talk:Juan_Manuel_de_Rosas#Third_opinion. I'd like to offer some input, but first, could you post some sources there that would help me out? Thanks. --Noleander (talk) 17:20, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your input at that Talk page. I've replied there, with another request. Thanks. --Noleander (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2012 (UTC)