Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Makecat: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:17, 16 June 2013

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Makecat/Archive.

– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Makecat has been blocked for sockpuppetry at zh.wikipedia: zh:WP:VPM#Makecat, zh:维基百科:用戶查核請求/2013/5#WP:LHLS (4) or Makecat, zh:User_talk:Bencmq#已确认, zh:Wikipedia:持续出没的破坏者/Makecat, m:Special:Log/Bencmq, zh:WP:互助客栈/其他/存档/2013年5月#Makecat. I've taken a look at all the centauth pages of all the socks I saw, and there were some enwiki VOA blocks (though I have no way of knowing whether those VOAs were Confirmed or not as I do not understand zhwiki's CU/SPI system or Chinese), so this may require investigating to protect the interests of the project. Several accounts were blocked on Meta (and a few other random Wikipedias) and/or globally locked. This will obviously require coordination with the zhwiki CUs. Rs chen 7754 12:24, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk endorsed - in the strictest sense of the word, as I do not know if there will be enough evidence to run a check, yet CU attention is required as zhwiki CU info is obviously necessary. Rs chen 7754 12:25, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Declined While the zhwiki CU activity warranted a cursory check, I see nothing untoward in Makecat's user contributions on enwiki that justifies looking in any deeper. — Coren ^(talk) 13:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- From what I could tell it was mostly goodhand/badhand socking, but I've asked Bencmq to comment. --Rs chen 7754 22:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - "Mostly goodhand/badhand socking" that is right, but not so much 'goodhand' part for the last few months. I am not sure if Makecat is still making more socks, but unlikely you can find anything since most of the socks come from proxies while the main account usually don't. --Ben.MQ (talk) 04:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 *{{declined}}  While the zhwiki CU activity warranted a cursory check, I see nothing untoward in Makecat's user contributions on enwiki that justifies looking in any deeper.  &mdash;&nbsp;[[User:Coren|Coren]]&nbsp;<sup>[[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]]</sup> 13:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 **From what I could tell it was mostly goodhand/badhand socking, but I've asked Bencmq to comment. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 22:11, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
+*** "Mostly goodhand/badhand socking" that is right, but not so much 'goodhand' part for the last few months. I am not sure if Makecat is still making more socks, but unlikely you can find anything since most of the socks come from proxies while the main account usually don't. --[[User:Bencmq|Ben.MQ]] ([[User talk:Bencmq|talk]]) 04:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->