Talk:UFC 161: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:35, 26 June 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the UFC 161 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mixed martial arts Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mixed martial arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mixed martial arts concepts, events, and biographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mixed martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Mixed martial artsmixed martial arts articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Format for this page

When this event is done lets focus on shaping it up like UFC 140 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul "The Wall" (talk • contribs) 19:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Without something extraordinary happening I doubt this event will be all that notable. There is no championship match at this event. No one particular match at this event seems to be particularly notable. Coverage of this event is likely to be WP:ROUTINE coverage of fight announcements and results. Striving to improve the article to be like UFC 94 or UFC 140 is great. We'll have to wait to the end of the night to see if the event itself will provide material to actually have a notable article about it. --TreyGeek (talk) 02:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If a title fight is note worthy then this event is also because any of the main/ co-main event fighters would automatically get a title fight in any other promotion if they left the UFC today. The UFC is not a routine organization and it is still growing. Two years ago you could say that the Heavyweight division had competition from other organizations, but now is this the case? Anyways, your right that within UFC this event is routine, but in MMA as a whole it is not. I'll remove the noteworthy tag. Peace 70.127.227.92 (talk) 06:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So why exactly is this particular event notable (as per Wikipedia's policies and guidelines)? I don't see a specific reason cited by you. Whether or not the UFC is a routine organization is not at issue here. It is whether the news coverage of this particular event is routine. Routine coverage would be the usual fight announcements, play-by-plays and results without much in the way in in-depth coverage of the event and its significance to the (MMA) world. Coverage that I have seen falls in this category. I haven't seen why this particular event is special above other events and no one has bothered to explain why it is. --TreyGeek (talk) 12:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :Without something extraordinary happening I doubt this event will be all that notable.  There is no championship match at this event.  No one particular match at this event seems to be particularly notable.  Coverage of this event is likely to be [[WP:ROUTINE]] coverage of fight announcements and results.  Striving to improve the article to be like [[UFC 94]] or [[UFC 140]] is great.  We'll have to wait to the end of the night to see if the event itself will provide material to actually have a notable article about it.  --[[User:TreyGeek|TreyGeek]] ([[User talk:TreyGeek|talk]]) 02:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 ::If a title fight is note worthy then this event is also because any of the main/ co-main event fighters would automatically get a title fight in any other promotion if they left the UFC today. The UFC is not a routine organization and it is still growing. Two years ago you could say that the Heavyweight division had competition from other organizations, but now is this the case? Anyways, your right that within UFC this event is routine, but in MMA as a whole it is not. I'll remove the noteworthy tag. Peace [[Special:Contributions/70.127.227.92|70.127.227.92]] ([[User talk:70.127.227.92|talk]]) 06:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
+:::So why exactly is this particular event notable (as per Wikipedia's policies and guidelines)?  I don't see a specific reason cited by you.  Whether or not the UFC is a routine organization is not at issue here.  It is whether the news coverage of this particular event is routine.  Routine coverage would be the usual fight announcements, play-by-plays and results without much in the way in in-depth coverage of the event and its significance to the (MMA) world.  Coverage that I have seen falls in this category.  I haven't seen why this particular event is special above other events and no one has bothered to explain why it is.  --[[User:TreyGeek|TreyGeek]] ([[User talk:TreyGeek|talk]]) 12:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)