Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GarbleCard: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Stalwart111 (talk | contribs) yes |
Eragon.raju (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*I have removed some content and references which are not meet Wikipedia rules. Is this page still considerd for delation? [[User:Yanis ahmed|Yanis ahmed]] ([[User talk:Yanis ahmed|talk]]) 05:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC) |
*I have removed some content and references which are not meet Wikipedia rules. Is this page still considerd for delation? [[User:Yanis ahmed|Yanis ahmed]] ([[User talk:Yanis ahmed|talk]]) 05:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
::Yes, because you removed content but didn't add any sources that might allow this subject to meet our inclusion guidelines. [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''<font color="green">111</font>''']] 05:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC) |
::Yes, because you removed content but didn't add any sources that might allow this subject to meet our inclusion guidelines. [[User: Stalwart111|'''Stalwart''']][[User talk:Stalwart111|'''<font color="green">111</font>''']] 05:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC) |
||
* '''Comment'''- In this article, every related facts are described and added references to the facts. This is a new security equipment and concerned with the facts discussed in the article. Please consider the facts and '''KEEP''' the article. |
|||
Revision as of 06:37, 15 July 2013
- GarbleCard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There just doesn't seem to be enough coverage out there for this to pass WP:GNG. The coverage of the product is from the product's own website. Everything else relates to other associated issues and none of them mention the product. Stalwart111 01:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- I also strongly suspect there is some paid editing involved here given the obvious (to me anyway) links between the creator and company. Stalwart111 01:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Endorse nominee, article fails GNG, and it lacks media coverage, the article also seems to be related with paid editing which is strictly against WP:Policies and WP:Guidelines. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 01:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- I have removed some content and references which are not meet Wikipedia rules. Is this page still considerd for delation? Yanis ahmed (talk) 05:27, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, because you removed content but didn't add any sources that might allow this subject to meet our inclusion guidelines. Stalwart111 05:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
- Comment- In this article, every related facts are described and added references to the facts. This is a new security equipment and concerned with the facts discussed in the article. Please consider the facts and KEEP the article.